Palestina: Amid Indifference and Inefectiveness
posted by F Espinoza | 08.01.2009 14:20 | Palestine | Terror War | World
Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told the Israeli parliament on April 22, 2004, "The support of President George W. Bush for Israel’s plan for the Palestinian territories is an unprecedented success." Those words summarize why there has been no solution to a conflict that worsens by the day.
Palestina: Amid Indifference and Inefectiveness
ELSON CONCEPCION PEREZ
Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told the Israeli parliament on April 22, 2004, "The support of President George W. Bush for Israel’s plan for the Palestinian territories is an unprecedented success." Those words summarize why there has been no solution to a conflict that worsens by the day.
Since May 11, 1949, when the United Nations admitted Israel as a member state, 60 years have passed characterized by three aspects: the constant Israeli violation and occupation of territories belonging to Palestine, Syria and Lebanon; total military support and incentive from the United States; and international indifference led by the ineffective institutions of the UN itself, whose resolutions are boycotted by the United States or have not helped to lessen the conflict.
International indifference, the unworkability of the UN Security Council, and the internal division within the Palestinian movement have all taken their toll.
The Arab States, the Non-Aligned Movement and other European, Asian and Latin American nations have proposed obligatory actions to require Israel to cease the occupation and the attacks. But time and time again, that hand is raised by Washington with its veto to take away any possible validity of those initiatives.
RESOLUTIONS AND NO SOLUTIONS
In 1947, Resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly established the existence of a Palestinian State and a Jewish State, as well as a zone under international control in sacred places such as Jerusalem and Belen. The resolution was never applied and six months later, on May 15, 1948, Israel began its aggression in what was called the first Arab-Israeli war.
After the forced expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their lands, the UN adopted Resolution 194 of December 11, 1948, demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But that was just another of the international demands that was never obeyed by the Israeli government.
If there is any UN Security Council agreement that shows how fragile the UN is and how little respect it receives from Israel and the United States, it is Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967, which demands a just and lasting peace in the Middle East that includes the withdrawal of the Israeli Army from the occupied territories.
Subsequently, in 1979 the Security Council approved resolution 446 that declared illegal the Jewish settlements that Israel began to build and has continued to erect in the occupied territories.
The adoption of Resolution 478, which sharply rejects the approval by the Israeli parliament declaring Jerusalem as its capital; Resolution 497 that invalidates the Israeli annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights; Resolution 3236 that establishes the right of the displaced or expelled Palestinians to return to their homes, and many more, have become documents shelved as part of the international indifference to the conflict. This, thanks to the Israeli non-compliance and the backing of the United States in its double standard policy.
THE RIGHT TO RESIST
It is the Palestinian population that has withstood the worst of the situation. Thousands have been killed, wounded or mutilated, massacred by the Israeli bombs, missiles and tanks. Tens of thousands have lived during decades in refugee camps within their country and in neighboring lands.
Meanwhile, the Israeli settlements grow, as is the wall being raised along kilometers of Palestinian land.
Another measure is the closing of the borders with Egypt and Israel, as part of the genocidal policy that deprives the Arab population of medicines, food, electricity, water and other basic resources.
Under these circumstances, Palestinian resistance is the only possible weapon to defend the existence of the nation itself, its independence and the right to exist as a state of its own.
However, an internal element, the division among Palestinians, makes their cause more vulnerable.
External pressures and concessions in search of a final solution appear to feed a path of clear desperation in the application of unfavorable methods of waging war.
Today, Palestine is divided. Gaza, with 1.5 million inhabitants, is a besieged, attacked, massacred city, with 80 percent of the population facing hunger. It is governed by the Hamas group, which won in elections, and which the US brands as terrorist.
Since the death of historic Palestinian leader of President Yasser Arafat, Israel and the United States have put all their efforts towards fomenting division.
On the one hand are the political and diplomatic policies of Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who still trusts in The Road Map plan, and others equally unrealistic and unviable plans as long as the US is both judge and jury. On the other is the Islamic resistance led by the Hamas movement, in Gaza.
Bush and the aggressive US governments; Israel with its thirst for territories and blood; the UN with resolutions that don’t resolve; and the divided Palestinian movement, make peace in the Middle East increasingly less viable and especially for the suffering Arab population that Israel wants to fence into true ghettos.
http://www.granma.cubaweb.cu/english/news/art0046.html
ELSON CONCEPCION PEREZ
Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told the Israeli parliament on April 22, 2004, "The support of President George W. Bush for Israel’s plan for the Palestinian territories is an unprecedented success." Those words summarize why there has been no solution to a conflict that worsens by the day.
Since May 11, 1949, when the United Nations admitted Israel as a member state, 60 years have passed characterized by three aspects: the constant Israeli violation and occupation of territories belonging to Palestine, Syria and Lebanon; total military support and incentive from the United States; and international indifference led by the ineffective institutions of the UN itself, whose resolutions are boycotted by the United States or have not helped to lessen the conflict.
International indifference, the unworkability of the UN Security Council, and the internal division within the Palestinian movement have all taken their toll.
The Arab States, the Non-Aligned Movement and other European, Asian and Latin American nations have proposed obligatory actions to require Israel to cease the occupation and the attacks. But time and time again, that hand is raised by Washington with its veto to take away any possible validity of those initiatives.
RESOLUTIONS AND NO SOLUTIONS
In 1947, Resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly established the existence of a Palestinian State and a Jewish State, as well as a zone under international control in sacred places such as Jerusalem and Belen. The resolution was never applied and six months later, on May 15, 1948, Israel began its aggression in what was called the first Arab-Israeli war.
After the forced expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their lands, the UN adopted Resolution 194 of December 11, 1948, demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But that was just another of the international demands that was never obeyed by the Israeli government.
If there is any UN Security Council agreement that shows how fragile the UN is and how little respect it receives from Israel and the United States, it is Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967, which demands a just and lasting peace in the Middle East that includes the withdrawal of the Israeli Army from the occupied territories.
Subsequently, in 1979 the Security Council approved resolution 446 that declared illegal the Jewish settlements that Israel began to build and has continued to erect in the occupied territories.
The adoption of Resolution 478, which sharply rejects the approval by the Israeli parliament declaring Jerusalem as its capital; Resolution 497 that invalidates the Israeli annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights; Resolution 3236 that establishes the right of the displaced or expelled Palestinians to return to their homes, and many more, have become documents shelved as part of the international indifference to the conflict. This, thanks to the Israeli non-compliance and the backing of the United States in its double standard policy.
THE RIGHT TO RESIST
It is the Palestinian population that has withstood the worst of the situation. Thousands have been killed, wounded or mutilated, massacred by the Israeli bombs, missiles and tanks. Tens of thousands have lived during decades in refugee camps within their country and in neighboring lands.
Meanwhile, the Israeli settlements grow, as is the wall being raised along kilometers of Palestinian land.
Another measure is the closing of the borders with Egypt and Israel, as part of the genocidal policy that deprives the Arab population of medicines, food, electricity, water and other basic resources.
Under these circumstances, Palestinian resistance is the only possible weapon to defend the existence of the nation itself, its independence and the right to exist as a state of its own.
However, an internal element, the division among Palestinians, makes their cause more vulnerable.
External pressures and concessions in search of a final solution appear to feed a path of clear desperation in the application of unfavorable methods of waging war.
Today, Palestine is divided. Gaza, with 1.5 million inhabitants, is a besieged, attacked, massacred city, with 80 percent of the population facing hunger. It is governed by the Hamas group, which won in elections, and which the US brands as terrorist.
Since the death of historic Palestinian leader of President Yasser Arafat, Israel and the United States have put all their efforts towards fomenting division.
On the one hand are the political and diplomatic policies of Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who still trusts in The Road Map plan, and others equally unrealistic and unviable plans as long as the US is both judge and jury. On the other is the Islamic resistance led by the Hamas movement, in Gaza.
Bush and the aggressive US governments; Israel with its thirst for territories and blood; the UN with resolutions that don’t resolve; and the divided Palestinian movement, make peace in the Middle East increasingly less viable and especially for the suffering Arab population that Israel wants to fence into true ghettos.
http://www.granma.cubaweb.cu/english/news/art0046.html
posted by F Espinoza
Comments
Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments
Why no solution?
08.01.2009 17:27
At any time they wanted to, the Israelis could "force" statehood on the Palestinians. All they need do is entirely pull out of the West Bank (temporarily giving up Jerusalem) and allow the Palestinains to control THEIR SIDE of the their borders with the outside world. Then note the following"
1) The Israelis can then LEGITIMATELY have their side of those borders shut tight. You have no way to demand they let you supply the Palestinians or supplies in or out THROUGH ISRAEL (if you don't believe that, look at a map -- Israel would NOT be surrounding either part).
2) Reality is that to be economicly viable the Palestinians need to be supplied via Israel and need a transit corridor between (it's really a long way around via Egypt and Jordan). But they have no "coin" to pay for that except Jerusalem. You are going to want to say "but they can offer peace" but you forget that the strong don't NEED peace from the weak.
3) Since the reality is that some Palestinians will continue to attack across the border and a "state" is considered responsible (if the attacked neighbor insists) the Israelis can more or less force a civil war upon the Palestinians or be crushed in war -- with the Israelis being careful not to "reoccupy" and so assume no responsibility for the population.
Might I humbly suggest that the reasons we aren't seeing much progress might be things like ......
a) Perhaps lots of the Israelis don't want to be killing huge numbers of Palestinians.
b) Perhaps the Palestinians consider that a civil war would be worse than oppression by the Israelis -- at least they aren't killing each other.
c) Some of you possibly want to suggest that the "solution" would be for the Israelis to cease to exist. I might agree that is the only way I can see to "peace" for the Palestinians but it shouldn't surprise you if the Israelis don't see it that way.
Look at your own history with regard to Ireland in the 20's. However the Irish look at this (how some of them betrayed the cause by signing acceptance of the 26 and how that led to their civil war) the reality is that you Brits could have forced this on them any time you chose by simply withdrawing from the 26. You didn't NEED a "signed agreement" to do that (but lacking one, would have ended up killing a lot of Irish).
Mike Novack
Why no solution?
08.01.2009 17:27
At any time they wanted to, the Israelis could "force" statehood on the Palestinians. All they need do is entirely pull out of the West Bank (temporarily giving up Jerusalem) and allow the Palestinains to control THEIR SIDE of the their borders with the outside world. Then note the following"
1) The Israelis can then LEGITIMATELY have their side of those borders shut tight. You have no way to demand they let you supply the Palestinians or supplies in or out THROUGH ISRAEL (if you don't believe that, look at a map -- Israel would NOT be surrounding either part).
2) Reality is that to be economicly viable the Palestinians need to be supplied via Israel and need a transit corridor between (it's really a long way around via Egypt and Jordan). But they have no "coin" to pay for that except Jerusalem. You are going to want to say "but they can offer peace" but you forget that the strong don't NEED peace from the weak.
3) Since the reality is that some Palestinians will continue to attack across the border and a "state" is considered responsible (if the attacked neighbor insists) the Israelis can more or less force a civil war upon the Palestinians or be crushed in war -- with the Israelis being careful not to "reoccupy" and so assume no responsibility for the population.
Might I humbly suggest that the reasons we aren't seeing much progress might be things like ......
a) Perhaps lots of the Israelis don't want to be killing huge numbers of Palestinians.
b) Perhaps the Palestinians consider that a civil war would be worse than oppression by the Israelis -- at least they aren't killing each other.
c) Some of you possibly want to suggest that the "solution" would be for the Israelis to cease to exist. I might agree that is the only way I can see to "peace" for the Palestinians but it shouldn't surprise you if the Israelis don't see it that way.
Look at your own history with regard to Ireland in the 20's. However the Irish look at this (how some of them betrayed the cause by signing acceptance of the 26 and how that led to their civil war) the reality is that you Brits could have forced this on them any time you chose by simply withdrawing from the 26. You didn't NEED a "signed agreement" to do that (but lacking one, would have ended up killing a lot of Irish).
Mike Novack
I wonder
08.01.2009 18:41
Pete
Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments