Skip to content or view screen version

EDO try to deal with anti-EDO graffiti

Benny Hill | 07.01.2009 23:54 | Smash EDO | South Coast

This week EDO have put their top brains to work in the war of words against their factory.

After a deluge of anti-EDO graffiti concerning Gaza appeared in Home Farm Road over the New Year EDO have started their own graffiti campaign around the factory.

Several anti-Hamas slogans have appeared with many pro-Israel comments around the path up to the factory. The problem is that at least five of the dumb scribblings have 'Israel' spelt 'Israil'. Maybe this is yet another new railway company or maybe EDO employees are just thick as shit and don't really know what they're talking about.

Or maybe they're Zoinists ;O)

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

Benny Hill

Comments

Hide 5 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

graffiti

08.01.2009 12:34

I hate graffiti regardless of whether it contains spelling mistakes or what its message is about.

I remember years ago in a park, a guy jumped off his bike and started spray painting a message on the path. It ended up with it him on the ground, whilst i stood on his neck and explained the idea of council tax to him. Then i sprayed his bike which he was quite upset about probably because it was money out of his pocket. HA HA

tom


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

idiot

08.01.2009 13:20

tom your a wanker if i saw you do that i would kick the shit out of you
you think using violence ageinst a boy to stop him spraying on a path way is acceptable
you need to think about what you have done, your 'council tax' is never gonna be worth 'stamping on someones neck' what the fucks wrong with you

A


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

reply

08.01.2009 15:21

Sorry you'll making a few incorrect assumptions there.
Its wasn't a boy, it was a fully grown adult about 25 years old. And i didn't stamp on him. I tried to verbally stop him doing the damage, but he gave me serious abuse and told me to f-off.
I could of done two things. Walking away would be irresponsible on my part, because he would believe he has won and is allowed to act like this. This would make it a lot harder for the next person to try and stop him. So i decided to put him on the floor and held him on the ground with my foot so i could talk to him. I'm a judo instructor so I could do so knowing safely.

He knew he was doing wrong because when i started spray his bike, he admitted it was damaging the surrounding area for everyone else (it was a nice recreational park) and said he wouldn't do it again. He was actual ok about it once he realised i was in charge of the situation andrealised what he was doing was actually wrong.

The biggest mistake he made was assuming he could trash the local area and people would walk past and be too scared to hold him to account. Once he realised that was a false assumption, everything else fitted into place for him.

tom


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Hate yourself do we Tom? It shows!

08.01.2009 18:51

Quote
"I hate graffiti regardless of whether it contains spelling mistakes or what its message is about"

So you hated yourself for what you did to that persons bike? As you said, doesn't matter if it contains spelling mistakes or the purpose / message.

Your act of graffiti was a deterrent to this person, in an attempt to gain a "confession" from him, which you hate regardless right??

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrite

PS: gaining "confessions" using of force is not only stupid and injustified but is entirely unreliable.

toms soul


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

reply

08.01.2009 20:47


>> So you hated yourself for what you did to that persons bike? As you said, doesn't matter if it contains spelling mistakes or the purpose / message. Your act of graffiti was a deterrent to this person, in an attempt to gain a "confession" from him, which you hate regardless right??
Mine wasn't graffiti. I was helpfully re-spraying his bike in a fashionable colour but I think he was annoyed and felt it was more like needless damage to something he cared about. Oh well.

>> hypocrite...
Lol. Boo-hoo - tough. Let people will walk all over you then if you want. I had different reasons for painting than he had. And it worked, whereas your latte-slurping, debating would do f-all. You can bleat all you want. I can only pity people who helplessly watch someone destroy something they care about and are too cowardly to do something about it.

>> pS: gaining "confessions" using of force is not only stupid and injustified but is entirely unreliable.
I didn't need a confession as I saw it with my own eyes. He worked out he couldn't use physical force to get his way and he couldn't run away, so the only option left was reasoned discussion. He wasn't able to convince me or, more importantly, himself that he had good reason for doing what he was, so he decided to stop.

tom


Hide 5 hidden comments or hide all comments