Skip to content or view screen version

brian haw narrowly escaped parliament square ban in court today

rikki | 24.12.2008 01:18 | SOCPA | Anti-militarism | Repression

at westminster court, judge caroline tubbs banned brian haw (the parliament square peace protestor who has been there for more than seven years) with an exclusion order covering the westminster area. barristers eventually managed to have the ruling suspended pending an appeal, but the threat is still very much there.

the GLA couldn't get rid of him. the government couldn't get rid of him. even the flawed SOCPA legislation failed in it's main aim to get rid of him, but today, a magistrate at horseferry road very nearly succeeded!

the case arises from an alleged assault by brian on a man named nigel cutteridge back in september 2007. although police didn't even approach brian about the incident until two months later.

nigel cutteridge has previous convictions and is certainly a maverick (he also ran a strange website www.angelnigel.com although this is currently down).

during the sentencing today, mr cutteridge (who is a self-confessed alcoholic) was expelled from the court by the judge. he was then expelled from the courthouse building because of threatening behaviour towards one of brian's supporters, barbara tucker.

at the time of the alleged assault, cutteridge had been drinking cider early in the morning, and had continually interrupted a conversation between brian haw and activist/comedian mark thomas (who was one of the defence witnesses in the case). at the time of the incident, cutteridge was apparently dressed in a pirate hat, wore lipstick, had his pants outside his trousers, and was wielding a cricket bat!

some time after the alleged assault, he boasted to an independent journalist (quite by chance in the street) about how he had been egged on by parliamentary police to goad brian and hassle him - he told her the police were very happy with him and would arrange publicity for him when they arrested brian. the journalist took notes of the strange unsolicited conversation, but the court didn't get to hear this evidence and the judge also refused to allow other dvd evidence of police collusion, including a long conversation between cutteridge and parliamentary police.

judge tubbs accepted the word of mr cutteridge (whose police record shows an astounding 213 stop-and-searches, as well as other convictions or cautions including 'drunk and disorderly' and 'behaviour liable to cause alarm or distress'), and she found brian guilty last week of common assault.

at the sentencing today at horseferry road, she imposed a 56-day 'exclusion order', banning brian from parliament square, whitehall and the area around parliament.

this would have given police the opportunity to remove his last few placards, the tent he sleeps in, and the voice of conscience he represents to the MPs that voted for the wars in iraq and afghanistan. in a flurry of legal activity, barristers argued that the ban could not be imposed as it would effectively make him homeless, but judge tubbs was adamant the decision would stand.

however, brian's barrister succeeded in lodging an immediate appeal, and in the face of that, judge tubbs had to finally back down, suspending the sentence until the outcome of such appeal.

in the meantime, brian and a few loyal supporters will continue their vigil in parliament square throughout christmas and into the new year - please offer them some support if you can.

rikki
- e-mail: rikkiindymedia[@t]gmail(d0t)com
- Homepage: http://www.socpa-movie.blogspot.com

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

when

24.12.2008 09:30

is barbara in court? your previous articles dont say

nigel


refrain from demonising

24.12.2008 14:03

i dont think Brian should be banner from the square in the slightest, in fact i commend him for his effort and met with him and the other campers many times. But please refrain from attempting to demonise this nigel person. Obviously you don't agree with what he is doing but it serves no purpose to try and paint him as a madman who is obviously talking bollox. Its a very negative way to write an article and i think an apology is in order.

captain pugwash


a picture of mr cutteridge

24.12.2008 16:19

mr cutteridge
mr cutteridge

if you were approached by this drunk wielding a cricket bat at 8am one morning, would you consider trying to defend yourself?

rikki


angelnigel.com at the internet archive

24.12.2008 17:27

angelnigel.com appears to have been very short-lived. Check out  http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.angelnigel.com for very little and 2 more images on Nigel.

jim


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Shhhhhh

24.12.2008 21:06

Pugwash, never question our venerated Saint Brian. You must always remember that he is infallible, he could never have been in the wrong for anything he's ever done at any point in his saintly life.

Humpty Dumpty


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments