USA Election PARTIALLY stolen ! . . . .10% shave, to keep senate delay-tactic ?
xamount of memory | 03.12.2008 15:23 | Climate Chaos | Globalisation | History | World
Premature celebrations amongst a worthy campaign to hinder the theft of the 2008 USA elections (e.g - see "freepress.org" s Columbus Free Press) might quite possibly have missed the fact that exit polls were also got at, the more "subtle" vote skims were turned up to their highest, where possible - but miscalculation, with ther limits to skullduggery caused as the last elections frauds unravelled, meant that aims wqere pushed back to trying to slow possible legislation.
Hence yesterdays announcement of the alleged "result" of the last senate seat to get a re-vote is seriously suspect - but also QUITE crucial.
Hence yesterdays announcement of the alleged "result" of the last senate seat to get a re-vote is seriously suspect - but also QUITE crucial.
Yesterday one of the last disputed senate revotes was called - oddly against the publics Obama swing - much understated - to stymie the 60 votes needed in the senate to get legislation through at a speed that is necessary.
This is a call for "election protection" types to put their thinking caps on again to GET PROOF of all this - like the last time, despite initial denials, or the claim that computer vote trails, phonecalls, bluetooth-type alterations from nearby etc are "totally opaque", computer forensics, statistics, the collation of lots of peoples little observations - it all adds up!
Remember Ohios local newspaper report about the old Board of Elections volunteer talking about the computer repair guy putting a little "patch" onto the machine the night prior to the investigation . . . . ETC.
PS Keep up the pressure on the Democrats - its all too possible they might settle for the idea of a few "topline" marginal, cosmetic adjustments, but get used to do things the G.O.P couldnt have gotten away with - but at the same time, dont shut the door to the possible seriously sensible steps/leaps they could take with the most useful sorts of engagement/pressure/support etc.
the whole worlds happier - a bit - but the whole worlds worrying, too !
keep it up -
the doors unlocked, perhaps, but it might need a bit of pushing . . . .
This is a call for "election protection" types to put their thinking caps on again to GET PROOF of all this - like the last time, despite initial denials, or the claim that computer vote trails, phonecalls, bluetooth-type alterations from nearby etc are "totally opaque", computer forensics, statistics, the collation of lots of peoples little observations - it all adds up!
Remember Ohios local newspaper report about the old Board of Elections volunteer talking about the computer repair guy putting a little "patch" onto the machine the night prior to the investigation . . . . ETC.
PS Keep up the pressure on the Democrats - its all too possible they might settle for the idea of a few "topline" marginal, cosmetic adjustments, but get used to do things the G.O.P couldnt have gotten away with - but at the same time, dont shut the door to the possible seriously sensible steps/leaps they could take with the most useful sorts of engagement/pressure/support etc.
the whole worlds happier - a bit - but the whole worlds worrying, too !
keep it up -
the doors unlocked, perhaps, but it might need a bit of pushing . . . .
xamount of memory
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Silly interpretation
03.12.2008 17:08
b) The revote was not a surprise result but an expected result. For two reasons. First, this was a moderate Republican candidate who failed on election day to get the necessary clear majority because many Republicans were voting for a more conservative altenrative in protest. Second, on national election day every Black voter who posisbly could got to the polls even if they had to be carried in on a stretcher. These were overwhelmingly Democratic votes and they had no such incentive to get to the polls the second time around.
The revote wasn't even close. All those conservatives decided that even a moderate Republican was better than risking the Democrats getting to 60 seats. Hey, even they have to make "lesser of evils" decisions sometimes just like we do. Like I said, no surprise at all that they would do so.
MDN
. . . . I remember "surprise", but that comment wasnt . . . .
05.12.2008 10:47
. . . .
Internal monologues ftw
06.12.2008 00:19
kirfjajf