Skip to content or view screen version

No Borders clarification

phatts | 31.10.2008 18:41 | Anti-racism | Globalisation | Migration

Wondering about the basic principles behind the No Borders and similar movements.

Reading about the No Borders camp this summer and events held for related campaigns, there is one aspect that bothers me.
I ask this question not as an attack, nor as a trolling exercise, but to reflect the view I always hear expressed by people outside 'the movement', who dont't necessarily hold racist views.
Namely : if we did open the borders to the UK or to Europe, wouldn't there be a massive influx of people hoping for a better life? If so, how would this be managed to prevent starvation or the emergence of a fascist dictatorship in reaction?
Put simply, as things stand if someone wants to come and make a better life in the rich areas of the world, they have to sneak in and then live a shadowy existence fearing a knock on the door at any moment...
If one rich country or region announced an end to the restrictions making life so difficult, I suspect there would be literally millions of migrants in a mass movement of hope and adventure. And when they got here? Assuming there weren't millions of job vacancies and empty homes, how would that work out?
Am I missing something? Does this make me a nazi? I hope not, and would appreciate an account of how it would happen.
Thanks

phatts

Comments

Display the following 11 comments

  1. no borders - anywhere — noborderer
  2. Quick reply — Chiara from No Borders
  3. More — Chiara again
  4. what would you do — another from No Borders
  5. Starvation — One of no borders
  6. 1884–85 ? Bridges not Walls & “the land of upright people,” — mass-imo-n
  7. quote for comment above — same as above
  8. good question - we need to speak to the average person, not politicos — ann archy
  9. don't feed the racist! — anonymous
  10. response to anonymous "don't feed the racist!" — ann archy
  11. thanks .. — phatts