Skip to content or view screen version

HLS & NYSE Shareholders Protests, London

SHAC London | 17.10.2008 15:35 | SHAC | Animal Liberation | Health

Wednesday 15th October, 07:30hrs.






Activists arrive at the New York Stock Exchange on Cousin Lane, London. It's been nearly 2 years since an early morning demonstration took place there. A few minutes after their arrival, staff realised they were there and rushed to close the shutters. The activists were only just handing out leaflets and holding placards. There wasn't even a megaphone in sight. Remaining at the site for an hour and a half they received a fantastic response from the public and workers of NYSE with many asking what they could do about the situation and a nice variation on the usual, boring "get a job!" - "go back to bed".

Just before midday activists met with others and headed for HLS and NYSE top shareholder, Barclays Bank, on King Street. A pretty good location, they again got a good response from the public while they handed out leaflets, chanted and informed the public and Barclay's customers about who the bank supports. As the largest shareholder in both companies, Barclays can have a massive amount of influence over the stock exchange and can put pressure on them to de-list HLS. It is the financial support that their shareholders are providing that is keeping them open. Barclays prove to us that they support animal torture in HLS by owning a large number of HLS shares themselves.

On to target number 3: AXA at 7 Newgate Street. Activists stayed there for around an hour. It appears they have sold their handful of HLS shares (about 7,000) like we were informed last week, wanting to appear a "responsible company" but they still own their shares in the NYSE. They were reminded that the responsible thing to do would be to put pressure on NYSE Euronext.

Fleet Street and Goldman Sachs were up next, owning over 10,000 shares in HLS and over 3 million in the NYSE. While the majority of the activists stayed outside the main entrance of the building, chanting and informing passers-by of what the demo was about, 2 others decided to do a spontaneous moving demonstration around the building. There were quite a few curious on-lookers who were informed of why the protesters were there and seemed very supportive. Goldman Sachs must be so ashamed of the business that it seems to be company policy not to put their company name on their buildings! Maybe the CEO could buy one out of his obscene £30+ million bonus!?

Last to come was Barclays, just across the road from Goldman Sachs. This was a shorter demo, just to remind the bank that wherever they are, they can expect demonstrations until they make the ethical decision and help us to close down HLS for good.

All in all, a great day of demos. Remember, the SHAC campaign will not cease until the doors of HLS close permanently. Until that day, whatever the weather (today: occasional light showers) you can expect to find us out on the streets.

Get yourself psyched up (and your masks out) for Scary Science Week - coming soon!

SHAC London
- e-mail: info@shac.net
- Homepage: http://www.shac.net

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

SHAC people

17.10.2008 15:59

Something very fishy is going on right now at Indymedia. A number of individuals have repeatedly tried to inform people about the level of infiltration within the animal rights movement at the moment and to warn about probable upcoming arrests but have been prevented doing so by somebody within the UK Indymedia kollective.

Here for example somebody called “Pat from Veggies” who is not a known Indy moderator has decided to remove all references to warnings and infiltration information
 http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-moderation/2008-October/1006-ia.html

About this post which contained important warnings and facts

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/09/408433.html?c=all

Secondly a post detailing facts of what had happened.
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/410928.html?c=all

As predicted by a poster quickly hidden by somebody in the UK Kollective but not posted to the Moderation lists as required by the rules – see here
 http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-uk-moderation/2008-October/date.html


Third Instance……
Some people claimed that nobody had been arrested in Hampshire then we get this

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/411091.html

Confirmation !

It seems that some people today are now under arrest when they could have avoided it because unnamed individuals within or associated with Indymedia decided to hide the information.

We need to know who did this and why.

Concerned


"Concerned" is a pro animal abuse troll - please ignore

17.10.2008 17:38

The previous poster "Concerned" is a pro animal abuse troll - please ignore.

troll buster


Disinformation galore!!

17.10.2008 17:52

1. Not one person has given ANY constructive information about anyone thought to be a grass/infiltrator or informer. All we have heard so far is vague crap about informers being in various groups with absolutely nothing to back up these allegations.
2. We have seen lots of outright lies from these accusers for example Sean never went to London!
3. Promises have been made about informers/infiltrators being exposed but first of all no-one genuine would have actually put ANYTHING so damaging up unless they had the full facts, secondly weeks later we are all still waiting.
4. There is no evidence whatsoever to link the recent arrests with informers/infiltrators this is pure speculation. It may well be that people have been grassed up and we have all got to be really careful (I think that more raids may follow with a media fest surrounding Mel's trial and the Shac trial) but as yet no-one has any evidence of this. Until someone does have
information that can be released they should shut the fuck up!
5. Someone released info about Hampshire raids at the beginning of the week. Well they happened today, interestingly prophetic! (unless there were other arrests of people as yet unknown)

lynn sawyer


Who did this and why

19.10.2008 18:35

As a known Indymedia moderator, I handled the difficult task of troll-busting on the original incident referred to above, following direct consultation with others in indymedia and the respective AR campaign groups.

The subsequent articles were dealt with by other indymedia volunteers to save us all from the serial mis-information campaign of the so-called 'concerned', known to be using various identities, including falsely using the names of others.

Indymedia is an open publishing resource built on trust between participants, but is sadly open to abuse to those who, for whatever reason, are intent on disruption.

However 'concerned' kindly includes the link to my more detailed explanation of the situation, including my 'clarification regarding hidden comments' at  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/09/408433.html

Indymedia Pat