Drax coal protestors face persoanl liability claims
Orinoco | 08.09.2008 08:16 | Climate Camp 2008 | Climate Chaos
Orinoco
Orinoco | 08.09.2008 08:16 | Climate Camp 2008 | Climate Chaos
Orinoco
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
The exact opposite
08.09.2008 11:48
The reality is that our rights to protest/do civil disobedience does not mean that such actions are protected against civil actions for damages that result. Block a business for a day, and they can sue you for that loss. And win. Even a "necessity defense" that might protect you against criminal charges doesn't mean that anybody you damaged by the necessary action has to pick up the bill.
Of course whether that makes sense for them to do that depends upon whether you are "actionable". The old saying applies, "can't get blood out of a turnip". So if you are a penniless protestor, the threat of a 100,000 judgement against you means little; the days of debtors prison are long past. On the other hand, it's a serious threat to keep away protestors who might own their own homes, cars, etc.
Mike Novack
e-mail:
stepbyspefarm mtdata.com
Nearly £200,000
08.09.2008 21:57
Meanwhile, at Maidstone crown court, Greenpeace is defending an action against Kingsnorth coal-fired power station and is putting figures on how much CO2 emissions cost in terms of damages to property and livelihood. Which shows 2 things, first, that the charges and claims of companies can be defended and second, although we all know that climate change kills, a life has no (monetary) value in multinational land.
Malcolm
malcolm carroll
e-mail:
malcolm.carroll@btinternet.com
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments