Climate camp activists target environmentally ‘irresponsible’ meat industry
Climate Camp Vegan Action Group | 11.08.2008 14:18 | Climate Camp 2008 | Animal Liberation | Climate Chaos | Ecology | London
This morning, six Climate Camp activists climbed the roof of Smithfield meat market to highlight the links between climate change and meat consumption. The activists dropped a banner bearing the message “Fight climate change - Go Vegan”.
The activists also quoted the 2007 UN Food and Agriculture report that found that 18% of global greenhouse emissions are caused by animal farming – more than the entire transport sector worldwide. The protestors argue that all major political parties have failed to address this serious problem and as a consequence the public have not been encouraged to adopt an environmentally responsible diet.
The group is calling for more people to choose a vegan diet, which excludes all animal products including meat, eggs and dairy, in order to massively reduce climate altering emissions. “An animal-based diet is no longer sustainable with climate change threatening the planet, its ecosystems, and the people who depend on them,” said Clare Whitney, one of the activists.
The fossil fuel input to produce a day’s food for a vegan is just under 10,000 calories, compared to 34,000 calories for a meat eater – the equivalent of nearly 1.5 tonnes more carbon dioxide per person per year. As such, the climate camp protestors maintain, changing the way we eat is one of the most powerful ways for individuals to reduce their carbon footprint.
Smithfield market is one of the largest wholesale trading places for meat products in the UK. Eighty-five thousand tonnes of produce pass through it each year including meat, poultry and cheese.
Phil Murray, 22, noted: “the meat industry is up there with short-haul flights as one of the most environmentally irresponsible sectors.”
The action took place as part of the Camp for Climate Action, a week-long protest against the building of a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth in Kent, which, if built, will emit between 6 and 8 million tons of CO2 every year.
(This is actually just our press release but since the back light on our laptop just vanished we're going to have to leave it as that...)
The group is calling for more people to choose a vegan diet, which excludes all animal products including meat, eggs and dairy, in order to massively reduce climate altering emissions. “An animal-based diet is no longer sustainable with climate change threatening the planet, its ecosystems, and the people who depend on them,” said Clare Whitney, one of the activists.
The fossil fuel input to produce a day’s food for a vegan is just under 10,000 calories, compared to 34,000 calories for a meat eater – the equivalent of nearly 1.5 tonnes more carbon dioxide per person per year. As such, the climate camp protestors maintain, changing the way we eat is one of the most powerful ways for individuals to reduce their carbon footprint.
Smithfield market is one of the largest wholesale trading places for meat products in the UK. Eighty-five thousand tonnes of produce pass through it each year including meat, poultry and cheese.
Phil Murray, 22, noted: “the meat industry is up there with short-haul flights as one of the most environmentally irresponsible sectors.”
The action took place as part of the Camp for Climate Action, a week-long protest against the building of a new coal-fired power station at Kingsnorth in Kent, which, if built, will emit between 6 and 8 million tons of CO2 every year.
(This is actually just our press release but since the back light on our laptop just vanished we're going to have to leave it as that...)
Climate Camp Vegan Action Group
e-mail:
angelo.b@talk21.com
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
Smash the meat industry
11.08.2008 14:34
With every window broken, glued lock and slashed tyre, the meat industry suffers.
With every liberation, we further debate our speciesist relationship with animals.
Direct action works
Homepage: http://directaction.info
animal genocide?
12.08.2008 14:58
not john jordan
In response...
12.08.2008 16:59
If people stopped eating meat, farmers wouldn't keep breeding the animals in the first place, as there would be no point. Therefore the remaining animals could live out their natural lives and the intensive farming cycle would be stopped, plus the mass environmental destruction that goes with it...
common sense
Please think clearly
12.08.2008 19:56
There are excellent ethical and environmental reasons to oppose the way our society produces meat.
There is NO good environmental argument against eating meat "in theory. Arguments that the animals raised for meat would NECESSARILY be consuming food that could be utilized by humans is plain and simply untrue. This is rather easy to demonstrate without needing to go inot facts and figures.
Assume that the available land is being used to produce the maximum amount of vegetable food for humans that it possibly can. For the momment we don't have to know what that amount is, just that it is the max. Now those plants that produce the vegeatable food, there are parts of those plants that humans can't utilize as food. But in almost all cases SOME animal or other would be able to eat that stuff and some of those animals could be eaten.
PLEASE -- that's NOT an argument against veganism, just a plea that you .........
1) Stick to the ethical arguments that ARE valid instead of uttering untruths.
2) Evaluate the overall activist situation. Lot's of the "environmentals" for good or ill do not share the same system of ethical/religious beliefs. All too often I hear it said "no problem" as the vegans can "convert" the onmivores to the one true faith. But there really is danger here of dividing the movement by insisting that we can do EVERYTHING together instead of recognizing that we really are different and can work together on particualr campaigns.
Do you understand? There are "environmentals' who do not aspire to become "better" than (other) animals, who actually think the attitude "we can rise above our animal natures" is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Mike Novack
e-mail: stepbyst[efarm mtdata.com
Genuinely Curious?
13.08.2008 21:46
N
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments