However worthy you deem your cause (and I'm not interested in arguing that) you seem to be putting the cart before the horse. The problem here is NOT "the clowns in the Labour Party". The problem is the will or 99?% (certainly in tyhe high 90's) of the British people. That's the part about democracy that really sucks, doesn't it? That the decisions, when democracy is working properly, aren't necessarily the good, wise, just decisions that in your greater wisdom you know to be the right things to do. Instead the decisions made, for good OR ill, are the ones that "the people" want.

(as one of your greatest leaders put it, the virtue of democracy is that the alternatives end up being even worse)

Understand what I am saying here? You need to first convince the majority of your fellow Britains to desire "no borders". There's nothing wrong with "taking it to the streets" even before you have the support of the majority. But you need to have SOME numbers.

Please -- I am NOT saying that "civil disobedience" is wrong even when just a "majority of one". But in such cases your action SHOULD be a simple "act of conscience", a symbolic act indicating your dissent. At the present you lack enough support to justify a "pressure" campaign -- engaging in one changes the issue away from the cause itself to the more general one about what sorts of actions are appropriate in a democracy.

Don't bother saying "but we're anarchists". I am too. I'm not meaning that you need formal votes. But you do need some social consensus. If you think you do have some consensus for your position on "borders" you are suffering from self delusion.

So the SWP having screwed up the anti-war movement have now moved onto the asylum protest movement in their latest attempt to sell more papers.

With SWP help I'm sure those sans papiers feel a whole lot safer !