'The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites' -- by Kevin Ryan
Repost | 05.07.2008 04:52 | Analysis | Technology | Terror War | World
Regardless of how thermite materials were installed in the WTC, it is strange that NIST has been so blind to any such possibility. In fact, when reading NIST’s reports on the WTC, and its periodic responses to FAQs from the public, one might get the idea that no one in the NIST organization had never heard of nano-thermites before. But the truth is, many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST WTC investigation were not only well aware of nano-thermites, they actually had considerable connection to, and in some cases expertise in, this exact technology.
July 4, 2008
Below is a message from Journal of 9/11 Studies editor and physicist, Dr. Steven Jones, regarding the newest paper just published in the journal --
Kevin Ryan shows his skills as both a chemist and a “private investigator” in his paper, “The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites” – Published July 4, 2008, in the Journal of 9/11 Studies --
http://journalof911studies.com/
Kevin Ryan discusses nano-thermite (“super-thermite”) and provides very important results of his own investigation of connections between NIST and researchers studying/developing nano-thermite.
Several of us have been discussing nano-thermite for quite a while now. For instance, I announced in Boston last year the observation of red-gray chips which I found in WTC dust samples. (If you need to catch up, pls see this short video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4186920967571123147 ) Research papers on this material are now being written/reviewed for publication.
Thermite is comprised of aluminum powder and iron oxide powder (or another metal oxide). When the powders are “ultra-fine grain”, less than about 100 nano-meters, then nano-thermite is formed. This form of thermite, also known as “super-thermite,” is not just an incendiary – it is EXPLOSIVE!
I explained this distinction and even gave references to the explosive nature of super-thermite/nano-thermite in my first-published paper on 9/11, available here: http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
Here’s a quote from that paper, pp. 16-17 (hope you all have read it, or will do so!):
"Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos. "The advantage (of using nanometals) is in how fast you can get their energy out," Son says. Son says that the chemical reactions of superthermites are faster and therefore release greater amounts of energy more rapidly... Son, who has been working on nanoenergetics for more than three years, says that scientists can engineer nanoaluminum powders with different particle sizes to vary the energy release rates. This enables the material to be used in many applications, including underwater explosive devices… However, researchers aren't permitted to discuss what practical military applications may come from this research." (Gartner, January 2005)
Yet we still find debunkers stating loudly and incorrectly that “thermite is an incendiary” only (very hot, but slow-reacting), completely ignoring the facts about nano-thermite. A NIST FAQ says something like this – perhaps someone can dig up the reference. Time to set the record straight, in a big way.
And Kevin Ryan’s paper goes a LONG way to set the record straight about nano-thermite along with a solid framework for further investigation. ANY serious investigation must now include these data he provides on explosive nano-thermites and those who have researched these materials--having connections with the “official story” of 9/11.
There is much information also in his extensive footnotes, which I invite you to follow… I’m working on reading many of these myself!
I’m particularly pleased that Kevin’s paper is available before the BBC presentation (on July 6th) regarding WTC 7 and recent research.
When I was interviewed by BBC in March 2008 for this documentary, I spent hours with, and showed, the BBC crew red-gray chips in the laboratory. Will they even mention these compelling evidences for un-reacted nano-thermites found in the WTC dust? We’ll see…
I have one request of the 9/11 truth-leads-to-peace community as you read this: I’m trying to get a sample of nano-thermite/super-thermite for tests and comparisons. A LLNL (Los Alamos) report noted that “super-thermite electric matches” are used to ignite some fireworks, via an electric current through the super-thermite. Such super-thermite matches may be the easiest –to-get source for super-thermite…
*Quoting from the Los Alamos report (from a 2006 talk I gave):
“The Super-Thermite electric matches… are safer to use because they resist friction, impact, heat… thereby minimizing accidental ignition.
“Applications include triggering explosives for demolition”
http://awards.lanl.gov/PDFfiles/Super-Thermite_Electric_Matches_2003.pdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
by Kevin R. Ryan, 7-02-08
The Journal of 9/11 Studies
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
“Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.”
-- NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan 2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with explosive and thermite materials.
One of the most intriguing aspects of NIST’s diversionary posture has been their total lack of interest in explosive or pyrotechnic features in their explanations. Despite the substantial evidence for the use of explosives at the WTC (Jones 2006, Legge and Szamboti 2007), and the extensive expertise in explosives among NIST investigators (Ryan 2007), explosives were never considered in the NIST WTC investigation. Only after considerable criticism of this fact did NIST deign to add one small disclaimer to their final report on the towers, suggesting they found no evidence for explosives.
The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony (MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005, Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007). There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed.
Additionally, despite agreement from all parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008).
These inexplicable fires are a reminder that the WTC buildings were not simply demolished, but were demolished in a deceptive way. That is, the buildings were brought down so as to make it look like the impact of the planes and the resulting fires might have caused their unprecedented, symmetrical destruction. Therefore, shaped charges and other typical explosive configurations were likely used, but there was more to it than that. Those committing the crimes needed to create fire where it would not have existed otherwise, and draw attention toward the part of the buildings where the planes impacted (or in the case of WTC 7, away from the building altogether).
This was most probably accomplished through the use of nano-thermites, which are high-tech energetic materials made by mixing ultra fine grain (UFG) aluminum and UFG metal oxides; usually iron oxide, molybdenum oxide or copper oxide, although other compounds can be used (Prakash 2005, Rai 2005). The mixing is accomplished by adding these reactants to a liquid solution where they form what are called “sols”, and then adding a gelling agent that captures these tiny reactive combinations in their intimately mixed state (LLNL 2000). The resulting “sol-gel” is then dried to form a porous reactive material that can be ignited in a number of ways. The high surface area of the reactants within energetic sol-gels allows for the far higher rate of energy release than is seen in “macro” thermite mixtures, making nano-thermites “high explosives” as well as pyrotechnic materials (Tillitson et al 1999). Sol-gel nanothermites, are often called energetic nanocomposites, metastable intermolecular composites (MICs) or superthermite (COEM 2004, Son et al 2007), and silica is often used to create the porous, structural framework (Clapsaddle et al 2004, Zhao et al 2004). Nano-thermites have also been made with RDX (Pivkina et al 2004), and with thermoplastic elastomers (Diaz et al 2003). But it is important to remember that, despite the name, nano-thermites pack a much bigger punch than typical thermite materials. It turns out that explosive, sol-gel nano-thermites were developed by US government scientists, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL) (Tillitson et al 1998, Gash et al 2000, Gash et al 2002). These LLNL scientists reported that— “The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces. We have utilized this property to dip-coat various substrates to make sol-gel Fe,O,/ Al / Viton coatings. The energetic coating dries to give a nice adherent film. Preliminary experiments indicate that films of the hybrid material are self-propagating when ignited by thermal stimulus” (Gash et al 2002).
The amazing correlation between floors of impact and floors of apparent failure suggests that spray-on nano-thermite materials may have been applied to the steel components of the WTC buildings, underneath the upgraded fireproofing (Ryan 2008). This could have been done in such a way that very few people knew what was happening. The Port Authority’s engineering consultant Buro Happold, helping with evaluation of the fireproofing upgrades, suggested the use of “alternative materials” (NIST 2005). Such alternative materials could have been spray-on nano-thermites substituted for intumescent paint or Interchar-like fireproofing primers (NASA 2006). It seems quite possible that this kind of substitution could have been made with few people noticing. Regardless of how thermite materials were installed in the WTC, it is strange that NIST has been so blind to any such possibility. In fact, when reading NIST’s reports on the WTC, and its periodic responses to FAQs from the public, one might get the idea that no one in the NIST organization had never heard of nano-thermites before. But the truth is, many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST WTC investigation were not only well aware of nano-thermites, they actually had considerable connection to, and in some cases expertise in, this exact technology.
Here are the top ten reasons why nano-thermites, and nano-thermite coatings, should have come to mind quickly for the NIST WTC investigators.
1. NIST was working with LLNL to test and characterize these sol-gel nanothermites, at least as early as 1999 (Tillitson et al 1999).
2. Forman Williams, the lead engineer on NIST’s advisory committee, and the most prominent engineering expert for Popular Mechanics, is an expert on the deflagration of energetic materials and the “ignition of porous energetic materials”(Margolis and Williams 1996, Telengator et al 1998, Margolis and Williams 1999). Nano-thermites are porous energetic materials. Additionally, Williams’ research partner, Stephen Margolis, has presented at conferences where nano-energetics are the focus (Gordon 1999). Some of Williams’ other colleagues at the University of California San Diego, like David J. Benson, are also experts on nano-thermite materials (Choi et al 2005, Jordan et al 2007).
3. Science Applications International (SAIC) is the DOD and Homeland Security contractor that supplied the largest contingent of non-governmental investigators to the NIST WTC investigation. SAIC has extensive links to nano-thermites, developing and judging nano-thermite research proposals for the military and other military contractors, and developing and formulating nano-thermites directly (Army 2008, DOD 2007). SAIC’s subsidiary Applied Ordnance Technology has done research on the ignition of nanothermites with lasers (Howard et al 2005).
In an interesting coincidence, SAIC was the firm that investigated the 1993 WTC bombing, boasting that—“After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, our blast analyses produced tangible results that helped identify those responsible (SAIC 2004).” And the coincidences with this company don’t stop there, as SAIC was responsible for evaluating the WTC for terrorism risks in 1986 as well (CRHC 2008). SAIC is also linked to the late 1990s security upgrades at the WTC, the Rudy Giuliani administration, and the anthrax incidents after 9/11, through former employees Jerome Hauer and Steven Hatfill.
4. Arden Bement, the metallurgist and expert on fuels and materials who was nominated as director of NIST by President George W. Bush in October 2001, was former deputy secretary of defense, former director of DARPA’s office of materials science, and former executive at TRW.
Of course, DOD and DARPA are both leaders in the production and use of nanothermites (Amptiac 2002, DOD 2005). And military and aerospace contractor TRW has had a long collaboration with NASA laboratories in the development of energetic materials that are components of advanced propellants, like nano-gelled explosive materials (NASA 2001). TRW Aeronautics also made fireproof composites and high performance elastomer formulations, and worked with NASA to make energetic aerogels.
Additionally, Bement was a professor at Purdue and MIT. Purdue has a thriving program for nano-thermites (Son 2008). And interestingly, at MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology, we find Martin Z. Bazant, son of notable “conspiracy debunker” Zdenek P. Bazant (MIT 2008), who does research on granular flows, and the electrochemical interactions of silicon. Zdenek P. Bazant is interested in nanocomposites as well (Northwestern 2008), and how they relate to naval warfare (ONR 2008). MIT was represented at nano-energetics conferences as early as 1998 (Gordon 1998).
Bement was also a director at both Battelle and the Lord Corporation. Battelle (where the anthrax was made) is an organization of “experts in fundamental technologies from the five National Laboratories we manage or co-manage for the US DOE.” Battelle advertises their specialization in nanocomposite coatings (Battelle 2008). The Lord Corporation also makes high-tech coatings for military applications (Lord 2008). In 1999, Lord Corp was working with the Army and NASA on “advanced polymer composites, advanced metals, and multifunctional materials” (Army 1999).
5. Hratch Semerjian, long-time director of NIST’s chemical division, was promoted to acting director of NIST in November 2004, and took over the WTC investigation until the completion of the report on the towers. Semerjian is closely linked to former NIST employee Michael Zachariah, perhaps the world’s most prominent expert on nano-thermites (Zachariah 2008). In fact, Semerjian and Zachariah co-authored ten papers that focus on nano-particles made of silica, ceramics and refractory particles. Zachariah was a major player in the Defense University Research Initiative on Nanotechnology (DURINT), a groundbreaking research effort for nano-thermites.
6. NIST has a long-standing partnership with NASA for the development of new nano-thermites and other nano-technological materials. In fact, Michael Zachariah coordinates this partnership (CNMM 2008).
7. In 2003, two years before the NIST WTC report was issued, the University of Maryland College Park (UMCP) and NIST signed a memorandum of understanding to develop nano-technologies like nano-thermites (NIST 2003). Together, NIST and UMCP have done much work on nano-thermites (NM2 2008).
8. NIST has their own Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology (CNST 2008). Additionally, NIST’s Reactive Flows Group did research on nanostructured materials and high temperature reactions in the mid-nineties (NRFG 1996).
9. Richard Gann, who did the final editing of the NIST WTC report, managed a project called “Next-Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program”, both before and after 9/11. Andrzej Miziolek, another of the world’s leading experts on nano-thermites (Amptiac 2002), is the author of “Defense Applications of Nanomaterials”, and also worked on Richard Gann’s fire suppression project (Gann 2002). Gann’s project was sponsored by DOD’s Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), an organization that sponsored a number of LLNL’s nano-thermite projects (Simpson 2002, Gash et al 2003).
10. As part of the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer, NIST partners with the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Indian Head (NSWC-IH) on Chemical Science and Technology (FLCTT 2008). NSWC-IH is probably the most prominent US center for nano-thermite technology (NSWC 2008). In 1999, Jan Puszynski, a scientist working for the DURINT program, helped NSWC-IH design a pilot plant to produce nano-size aluminum powder. It was reported that “At that time, this was [the] only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States” (SDSMT 2001), however, private companies like Argonide and Technanogy were also known to have such capabilities. Among an interesting group of contractors that NSWC-IH hired in 1999 were SAIC, Applied Ordnance, Battelle, Booz Allen Hamilton, Mantech, Titan, Pacific Scientific Energetic (see below), and R Stresau Laboratories for “demolition materials” (NSWC 2000).
A tragic coincidence left William Caswell, an employee of NSWC-IH, dead on Flight 77 when it hit the Pentagon. He had for many years worked on “deepblack” projects at NSWC-IH (Leaf 2007).
The presence of Pacific Scientific Energetics (PSE) in this list of 1999 NSWC-IH contractors is interesting because PSE was the parent company of Special Devices, Inc (SDI). SDI specializes in explosives for defense, aerospace and mining applications, and was acquired in 1998 by John Lehman, 9/11 Commissioner, member of the Project for a New American Century, and former Secretary of the Navy (SDI 2008). Lehman divested in 2001.
With this in mind, it is worthwhile to reiterate that nano-thermite materials were very likely used in the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings, but most certainly played only a part in the plan. However, other high-tech explosives were available to those who had access to nano-thermite materials at the time. Like SDI, several other organizations with links to military, space and intelligence programs (e.g. In-Q-Tel, Orbital Science) have access to many types of high-tech explosives to cut high-strength bolts and produce pyrotechnic events. These organizations also have connections to those who could have accessed the buildings, like WTC tenant Marsh & McLennan and former NASA administrator and Securacom director, James Abrahamson. In any case, it is important for those seeking the truth about 9/11 to consider what organizations and people had access to the technologies that were used to accomplish the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings. It is also important to recognize the links between those who had access to the technologies, those who had access to the buildings, and those who produced the clearly false official reports. To that end we should note that NIST had considerable connections to nano-thermites, both before and during the WTC investigation. It is therefore inexplicable why NIST did not consider such materials as an explanation for the fires that burned on 9/11, and long afterward at Ground Zero. This fact would not be inexplicable, of course, if those managing the NIST investigation knew to not look, or test, for such materials.
References
Amptiac (2002), Amptiac Quarterly Volume 6, No 1, Special Issue: A Look Inside Nanotechnology, http://www.p2pays.org/ref/15/14610.pdf
Army (1999), Summaries of US Army budget activities, FY 1999 http://www.asafm.army.mil/budget/fybm/fy01/rforms/vol1/vol1.pdf
Army (2008), US Army SBIR 08.2 Proposal Submision Instructions http://www.dodsbir.net/solicitation/sbir082/army082.htm
Battelle (2008), Corporate website for Nanomaterials / Nanotechnology, http://www.battelle.org/solutions/&Nav_SectionID=1&Nav_CatID=1_NanomaterialsNanotechnology
Jordan, JL, Foley JR, Dick, RD, Ferranti L, Thadhani NN, McDowell DL, Austin RA, Benson DJ (2007), Equation of State of Aluminum-Iron Oxide-Epoxy Composite, Air Force Research Lab Eglin AFB FL Munitions Directorate
Chartek (now International Paint) is the maker of Interchar, and they work with NASA http://www.international-pc.com/pc/pds/963to_uk.pdf http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2006/ps_3.html
Choi HJ, Austin R, Allen JK, McDowell DL, Mistree F, Benson DJ (2005), An Approach for Robust Design of Reactive Power Metal Mixtures Based on Non-deterministic Microscale Shock Simulation, Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design, Volume 12, Number 1 / January, 2005
Clapsaddle BJ, Gash AE, Plantier KB, Pantoya ML, Satcher Jr. JH, Simpson RL (2004), Synthesis and Characterization of Mixed Metal Oxide Nanocomposite Energetic Materials, LLNL Report UCRL-PROC-204118
CNMM (2008), NIST/NASA Center for Nano Manufacturing and Metrology http://www.enme.umd.edu/cnmm/
CNST (2008), NIST Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology website http://cnst.nist.gov/
COEM (2004), Advanced Energetic Materials, Committee on Advanced Energetic Materials and Manufacturing Technologies, National Research Council, The National
Academies Press, online book available at— http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php
CRHC (1986), Cooperative Research History Commons, Context of ‘(Mid-1986): Report Rates Vulnerability of Public Areas of WTC to Terrorist Attack as ‘Very High’’ http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp=a86saicreport#a86saicreport
Diaz E, Brousseau P, Ampleman G, Prudhomme RE (2003), Polymer Nanocomposites from Energetic Thermoplastic Elastomers and Alex, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 28, No.4
DOD (2005), US Defense Nanotechnology Research and Development Programs, Department of Defense Director, Defense Research and Engineering, Executive Summary, May 2005, http://www.nano.gov/html/res/DefenseNano2005.pdf
DOD (2007), US Department of Defense, Annual Report on Cooperative Agreements and Other Transactions Entered into during Fiscal Year 2006 Under 10 USC 2371
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/attachments/fy2006caotreporttocongress-signed-20070129.pdf
Douglas, Eric (2006), The NIST WTC Investigation—How Real Was The Simulation?: A review of NIST NCSTAR 1, J 9/11 Studies, December 2006 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf
FLCTT (2008), Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer website http://www.flcmidatlantic.org/interagency_clusters.html
Gann RG (1997), Next-Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program (NGP): A Status Report, Halon Options Technical Working Conference, 6-8 May 1997 http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/866/HOTWC/HOTWC2006/pubs/R0301116.pdf
Gann RG (2002), FY2001 Annual Report Next Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program (NGP), NIST Technical Note 1445, Building and Fire Research Laboratory http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire02/PDF/f02006.pdf
Gash AE, Simpson RL,Tillitson TM, et al (2000), Making Nanostructured Pyrotechnics in a Beaker, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) UCRL-JC-137593, accessed online 16 February 2008, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/247064.pdf
Gash AE, Simpson RL, Satcher JH (2002), Energetic Nanocomposites with Sol-gel Chemistry: Synthesis, Safety, and Characterization, LLNL UCRL-JC-146739, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/244137.pdf
Gash A, Barbee T, Simpson R, Satcher J,.Walton C (2003), Environmentally Benign Stab Detonators, LLNL Report UCRL-TR-201628 http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/303520.pdf
Gordon (1998), Gordon Research Conference on Energetic Materials, June 1998 http://www.grc.org/programs.aspx
Gordon (1999), Gordon Research Conference on Energetic Materials, July 1999 http://www.grc.org/programs.aspx
Gourley J (2007), Appeal Filed with NIST, Pursuant to Earlier Request for Correction, J 9/11 Studies, December 2007 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl.pdf
Griffin, DR (2005), The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True, http://911Review.com/ http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
Howard SL; Morris JB; Beyer RA; Hamlin SJ; Martin J; Burke GC; Doris T; Laser initiation thresholds of a green aluminum/molybdenum- trioxide metastable intermolecular composite and other pyrotechnics, Proceedings of SPIE, http://cat.inist.fr/
Jones SE, Farrer J, Jenkins GS, Legge F, et al (2008) Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, J 9/11 Studies, http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
Jones SE, Legge FM, Ryan KR, (2008) Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Volume 2 Issue 1 http://www.benthamopen.org/pages/content.php/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM
Jones SE (2006), Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?, J 9/11 Studies, September 2006, http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
Jones S E, (2007), Revisiting 9/11/2001--Applying the Scientific Method, J 9/11 Studies, http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
Leaf (2007), The Leaf, White Oak Laboratory Alumni Assoc, Inc, Summer 2007, p 5 http://www.wolaa.org/files/Summer_2007_LEAF.pdf
Legge F (2007), The Twin Towers and Common Sense, J 9/11 Studies, February 2007, http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/g/CraneAndCommonSenseByFrankLegge.pdf
Legge F, and Szamboti, T (2007), 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible, J 9/11 Studies, December 2007 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Sudden_collapse_initiation_impossible.pdf
LLNL (2000), Science and Technology Review, October 2000, Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives, http://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html
Lord (2008), Lord Corporation website, Coatings http://www.lord.com/Home/ProductsServices/Coatings/AeroglazeAircraftAerospaceCoatings/tabid/3283/Default.aspx
MacQueen G (2006), 118 Witnesses: The Firefighter’s Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers, J 9/11 Studies, August 2006, http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf
Margolis SB, Williams FA (1996), Effect of gas-phase thermal expansion on stability of deflagrations in porous energetic materials. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 22, 69-91
Margolis SB, Williams FA (1999), Structure and Stability of Deflagrations in Porous Energetic Materials, Sandia Report SAND99-8458, Sandia National Laboratories MIT (2008), Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies website, http://web.mit.edu/isn/people/faculty/bazant.html .
Dr. Bazant has also been mentioned with regard to the development of “particles comprising a ‘smart gel’ that responds to a change in its environment”. http://www.azom.com/news.asp
NASA (2001), Glenn Research Center website page on gelled nano-energetics http://sbir.grc.nasa.gov/launch/RACNanotechnologyGelledFuelsDastoorHQ05-2001_brief.pdf .
See also brief description at the following link. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/RT2002/5000/5830palaszewski1.html
NASA (2006), Fire-Resistant Reinforcement Makes Steel Structures Sturdier, NASA website Scientific and Technical Information, Spinoffs 2006 http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2006/ps_3.html
NIST (2003), Announcement of NIST Memorandum of Understanding with the Univerisyt of Maryland, NIST website http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/univmdnanomou.htm
NIST (2005), WTC Report, NCSTAR 1-6A, Passive Fire Protection, p 25 http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6A.pdf
NIST (2007), NCST Advisory Committee Meeting, December 18, 2007, Final Meeting Minutes, http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACMeetingMinutes121807.pdf
NM2 (2008), NIST and UMCP, Co-Laboratory for Nanoparticle Based Manufacturing & Metrology http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/ Northwestern (2008), Civil Engineering Department website resume for Zdenek P. Bazant, “During the last few years, Bazant focused attention on the scaling of thin metallic films and nanocomposites on approach to nanoscale.” http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/resume.pdf
NRFG (1996), NIST’s Reactive Flows Group website, Selected Technical Reports http://www.cstl.nist.gov/div836/836.03/technical.html
NSWC (2000), GovernmentContractsWon.com, Year 2000 Government Contracts - Defense Department http://www.governmentcontractswon.com/department/defense/naval-surface-warfarecenter-in.asp?spg=73&yr=00
NSWC (2008), Webpage for Naval Surface Warfare Center – Indian Head http://www.ih.navy.mil/
ONR (2008), Scaling of Energy Absorption in Composites to Enhance Survivability, Office of Naval Research, ONR grant N00014-02-1-0622, Bazant Z, Northwestern University, http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
Hoffman J, Paul D, Star C (2005), 9/11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands, documentary film available at http://www.wtc7.net/ , http://www.wtc7.net/store/videos/proof/index.html
Pivkina A, Ulyanova P, Frolov Y (2004), Nanomaterials for Heterogeneous Combustion, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 29, No. 1
Prakash A, McCromick A., Zachariah MR (2004), Aero-Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanoporous Iron-Oxide Particles: A Potential Oxidizer for Nanoenergetic Materials, Chem. Mater., 16(8):1466-1471 http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2004_CM_FeO.pdf
Prakash, A, McCormick AV, Zachariah MR (2005), Synthesis and Reactivity of a Super- Reactive Metastable Intermolecular Composite Formulation of Al/KMnO4, Adv Mater 2005, 17, No. 7 April 4 http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2005_Adv_Mat_KMnO4.pdf
Rai A, Zhou L, Prakash A, McCormick A, Zachariah MR (2005), Understanding and Tuning the Reactivity of Nano-Energetic Materials, Mat Res Soc Sym Proc, 2006, Vol 896, pages 99-110
Ryan K (2006), What is 9/11 Truth? - The First Steps, J 9/11 Studies, August 2006 http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_1_Ryan5.pdf
Ryan K (2007), Looking for Truth in Credentials: The Peculiar WTC “Experts”, Global Research, March 13, 2007, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php=RYA20070313&articleId=5071
Ryan K (2008), Another Amazing Coincidence Related to the WTC, http://911blogger.com/ , http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
SAIC (2004), Science Applications International Corporation, Annual Report 2004 http://www.saic.com/news/pdf/Annual-Report2004.pdf
SDMST (2001), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology website, Research Experience for Teachers, Current Projects 2001 http://ret.sdsmt.edu/projectdescr.htm
SDI (2008), Special Devices Incorporated website, History http://www.specialdevices.com/company/history.htm
Simpson RL (2002), Safe and Environmentally Acceptable Sol-Gel-Derived Pyrophoric Pyrotechnics, SERDP Pollution Prevention PP-1276 http://www.serdp.org/Research/upload/PP-1276.pdf
Son SF, Yetter R, Yang V (2007), Introduction: Nanoscale Composite Energetic Materials, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 23, No. 4, July–August 2007
Son (2008), Steven Son energetic materials webpage at Purdue University http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~sson/composites_files/slide0001.htm
Tillotson TM, Simpson RL, Hrubesh LW (1999), Nanostructure High Explosives Using Sol-gel Chemistry, 98-ERD-048, LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Annual Report FY1999, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/238334.pdf (p 8-11 or 181 of 255)
Tillotson, TM, Hrubesh, Simpson RL Lee RS, Swansiger RW, Simpson LR (1998), Sol-Gel Processing of Energetic Materials, J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 225, 358
Telengator AM, Margolis SB, Williams FA (1998), Ignition Analysis of a Porous Energetic Material—II. Ignition at a Closed Heated End, Sandia National Laboratory, Sandia Report SAND98-8655, November 1998
University of Idaho Magazine, Fall 2002, p 15 http://www.uidaho.edu/herewehaveidaho/PDF/Fall2002.pdf
Zahcariah (2008), Faculty webpage for Michael Zachariah http://www.enme.umd.edu/facstaff/fac-profiles/zachariah.html
Zhao L, Clapsaddle BJ, Satcher Jr. JH, Schaefer DW, Shea KJ, (2004), Integrated Chemical Systems: the Simultaneous Formation of Hybrid Nanocomposites of Iron Oxide and Organo Silsesquioxanes, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRLJRNL-207355 http://e-reportsext.llnl.gov/pdf/312801.pdf
Below is a message from Journal of 9/11 Studies editor and physicist, Dr. Steven Jones, regarding the newest paper just published in the journal --
Kevin Ryan shows his skills as both a chemist and a “private investigator” in his paper, “The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites” – Published July 4, 2008, in the Journal of 9/11 Studies --
http://journalof911studies.com/
Kevin Ryan discusses nano-thermite (“super-thermite”) and provides very important results of his own investigation of connections between NIST and researchers studying/developing nano-thermite.
Several of us have been discussing nano-thermite for quite a while now. For instance, I announced in Boston last year the observation of red-gray chips which I found in WTC dust samples. (If you need to catch up, pls see this short video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4186920967571123147 ) Research papers on this material are now being written/reviewed for publication.
Thermite is comprised of aluminum powder and iron oxide powder (or another metal oxide). When the powders are “ultra-fine grain”, less than about 100 nano-meters, then nano-thermite is formed. This form of thermite, also known as “super-thermite,” is not just an incendiary – it is EXPLOSIVE!
I explained this distinction and even gave references to the explosive nature of super-thermite/nano-thermite in my first-published paper on 9/11, available here: http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
Here’s a quote from that paper, pp. 16-17 (hope you all have read it, or will do so!):
"Researchers can greatly increase the power of weapons by adding materials known as superthermites that combine nanometals such as nanoaluminum with metal oxides such as iron oxide, according to Steven Son, a project leader in the Explosives Science and Technology group at Los Alamos. "The advantage (of using nanometals) is in how fast you can get their energy out," Son says. Son says that the chemical reactions of superthermites are faster and therefore release greater amounts of energy more rapidly... Son, who has been working on nanoenergetics for more than three years, says that scientists can engineer nanoaluminum powders with different particle sizes to vary the energy release rates. This enables the material to be used in many applications, including underwater explosive devices… However, researchers aren't permitted to discuss what practical military applications may come from this research." (Gartner, January 2005)
Yet we still find debunkers stating loudly and incorrectly that “thermite is an incendiary” only (very hot, but slow-reacting), completely ignoring the facts about nano-thermite. A NIST FAQ says something like this – perhaps someone can dig up the reference. Time to set the record straight, in a big way.
And Kevin Ryan’s paper goes a LONG way to set the record straight about nano-thermite along with a solid framework for further investigation. ANY serious investigation must now include these data he provides on explosive nano-thermites and those who have researched these materials--having connections with the “official story” of 9/11.
There is much information also in his extensive footnotes, which I invite you to follow… I’m working on reading many of these myself!
I’m particularly pleased that Kevin’s paper is available before the BBC presentation (on July 6th) regarding WTC 7 and recent research.
When I was interviewed by BBC in March 2008 for this documentary, I spent hours with, and showed, the BBC crew red-gray chips in the laboratory. Will they even mention these compelling evidences for un-reacted nano-thermites found in the WTC dust? We’ll see…
I have one request of the 9/11 truth-leads-to-peace community as you read this: I’m trying to get a sample of nano-thermite/super-thermite for tests and comparisons. A LLNL (Los Alamos) report noted that “super-thermite electric matches” are used to ignite some fireworks, via an electric current through the super-thermite. Such super-thermite matches may be the easiest –to-get source for super-thermite…
*Quoting from the Los Alamos report (from a 2006 talk I gave):
“The Super-Thermite electric matches… are safer to use because they resist friction, impact, heat… thereby minimizing accidental ignition.
“Applications include triggering explosives for demolition”
http://awards.lanl.gov/PDFfiles/Super-Thermite_Electric_Matches_2003.pdf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
by Kevin R. Ryan, 7-02-08
The Journal of 9/11 Studies
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
“Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.”
-- NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11 (Douglas 2006, Ryan 2006, Gourley 2007). But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. This omission is at odds with several other striking facts; first, the requirement of the national standard for fire investigation (NFPA 921), which calls for testing related to thermite and other pyrotechnics, and second, the extensive experience NIST investigators have with explosive and thermite materials.
One of the most intriguing aspects of NIST’s diversionary posture has been their total lack of interest in explosive or pyrotechnic features in their explanations. Despite the substantial evidence for the use of explosives at the WTC (Jones 2006, Legge and Szamboti 2007), and the extensive expertise in explosives among NIST investigators (Ryan 2007), explosives were never considered in the NIST WTC investigation. Only after considerable criticism of this fact did NIST deign to add one small disclaimer to their final report on the towers, suggesting they found no evidence for explosives.
The extensive evidence that explosives were used at the WTC includes witness testimony (MacQueen 2006), overwhelming physical evidence (Griffin 2005, Hoffman et al 2005, Jones and Legge et al 2008) and simple common sense (Legge 2007). There is also substantial evidence that aluminothermic (thermite) materials were present at the WTC (Jones 2007), and the presence of such materials can explain the existence of intense fire where it would not otherwise have existed.
Additionally, despite agreement from all parties that the assumed availability of fuel allowed for the fires in any given location of each of the WTC buildings to last only twenty minutes (NIST 2007), the fires lasted much longer and produced extreme temperatures (Jones and Farrer et al 2008).
These inexplicable fires are a reminder that the WTC buildings were not simply demolished, but were demolished in a deceptive way. That is, the buildings were brought down so as to make it look like the impact of the planes and the resulting fires might have caused their unprecedented, symmetrical destruction. Therefore, shaped charges and other typical explosive configurations were likely used, but there was more to it than that. Those committing the crimes needed to create fire where it would not have existed otherwise, and draw attention toward the part of the buildings where the planes impacted (or in the case of WTC 7, away from the building altogether).
This was most probably accomplished through the use of nano-thermites, which are high-tech energetic materials made by mixing ultra fine grain (UFG) aluminum and UFG metal oxides; usually iron oxide, molybdenum oxide or copper oxide, although other compounds can be used (Prakash 2005, Rai 2005). The mixing is accomplished by adding these reactants to a liquid solution where they form what are called “sols”, and then adding a gelling agent that captures these tiny reactive combinations in their intimately mixed state (LLNL 2000). The resulting “sol-gel” is then dried to form a porous reactive material that can be ignited in a number of ways. The high surface area of the reactants within energetic sol-gels allows for the far higher rate of energy release than is seen in “macro” thermite mixtures, making nano-thermites “high explosives” as well as pyrotechnic materials (Tillitson et al 1999). Sol-gel nanothermites, are often called energetic nanocomposites, metastable intermolecular composites (MICs) or superthermite (COEM 2004, Son et al 2007), and silica is often used to create the porous, structural framework (Clapsaddle et al 2004, Zhao et al 2004). Nano-thermites have also been made with RDX (Pivkina et al 2004), and with thermoplastic elastomers (Diaz et al 2003). But it is important to remember that, despite the name, nano-thermites pack a much bigger punch than typical thermite materials. It turns out that explosive, sol-gel nano-thermites were developed by US government scientists, at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL) (Tillitson et al 1998, Gash et al 2000, Gash et al 2002). These LLNL scientists reported that— “The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces. We have utilized this property to dip-coat various substrates to make sol-gel Fe,O,/ Al / Viton coatings. The energetic coating dries to give a nice adherent film. Preliminary experiments indicate that films of the hybrid material are self-propagating when ignited by thermal stimulus” (Gash et al 2002).
The amazing correlation between floors of impact and floors of apparent failure suggests that spray-on nano-thermite materials may have been applied to the steel components of the WTC buildings, underneath the upgraded fireproofing (Ryan 2008). This could have been done in such a way that very few people knew what was happening. The Port Authority’s engineering consultant Buro Happold, helping with evaluation of the fireproofing upgrades, suggested the use of “alternative materials” (NIST 2005). Such alternative materials could have been spray-on nano-thermites substituted for intumescent paint or Interchar-like fireproofing primers (NASA 2006). It seems quite possible that this kind of substitution could have been made with few people noticing. Regardless of how thermite materials were installed in the WTC, it is strange that NIST has been so blind to any such possibility. In fact, when reading NIST’s reports on the WTC, and its periodic responses to FAQs from the public, one might get the idea that no one in the NIST organization had never heard of nano-thermites before. But the truth is, many of the scientists and organizations involved in the NIST WTC investigation were not only well aware of nano-thermites, they actually had considerable connection to, and in some cases expertise in, this exact technology.
Here are the top ten reasons why nano-thermites, and nano-thermite coatings, should have come to mind quickly for the NIST WTC investigators.
1. NIST was working with LLNL to test and characterize these sol-gel nanothermites, at least as early as 1999 (Tillitson et al 1999).
2. Forman Williams, the lead engineer on NIST’s advisory committee, and the most prominent engineering expert for Popular Mechanics, is an expert on the deflagration of energetic materials and the “ignition of porous energetic materials”(Margolis and Williams 1996, Telengator et al 1998, Margolis and Williams 1999). Nano-thermites are porous energetic materials. Additionally, Williams’ research partner, Stephen Margolis, has presented at conferences where nano-energetics are the focus (Gordon 1999). Some of Williams’ other colleagues at the University of California San Diego, like David J. Benson, are also experts on nano-thermite materials (Choi et al 2005, Jordan et al 2007).
3. Science Applications International (SAIC) is the DOD and Homeland Security contractor that supplied the largest contingent of non-governmental investigators to the NIST WTC investigation. SAIC has extensive links to nano-thermites, developing and judging nano-thermite research proposals for the military and other military contractors, and developing and formulating nano-thermites directly (Army 2008, DOD 2007). SAIC’s subsidiary Applied Ordnance Technology has done research on the ignition of nanothermites with lasers (Howard et al 2005).
In an interesting coincidence, SAIC was the firm that investigated the 1993 WTC bombing, boasting that—“After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, our blast analyses produced tangible results that helped identify those responsible (SAIC 2004).” And the coincidences with this company don’t stop there, as SAIC was responsible for evaluating the WTC for terrorism risks in 1986 as well (CRHC 2008). SAIC is also linked to the late 1990s security upgrades at the WTC, the Rudy Giuliani administration, and the anthrax incidents after 9/11, through former employees Jerome Hauer and Steven Hatfill.
4. Arden Bement, the metallurgist and expert on fuels and materials who was nominated as director of NIST by President George W. Bush in October 2001, was former deputy secretary of defense, former director of DARPA’s office of materials science, and former executive at TRW.
Of course, DOD and DARPA are both leaders in the production and use of nanothermites (Amptiac 2002, DOD 2005). And military and aerospace contractor TRW has had a long collaboration with NASA laboratories in the development of energetic materials that are components of advanced propellants, like nano-gelled explosive materials (NASA 2001). TRW Aeronautics also made fireproof composites and high performance elastomer formulations, and worked with NASA to make energetic aerogels.
Additionally, Bement was a professor at Purdue and MIT. Purdue has a thriving program for nano-thermites (Son 2008). And interestingly, at MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnology, we find Martin Z. Bazant, son of notable “conspiracy debunker” Zdenek P. Bazant (MIT 2008), who does research on granular flows, and the electrochemical interactions of silicon. Zdenek P. Bazant is interested in nanocomposites as well (Northwestern 2008), and how they relate to naval warfare (ONR 2008). MIT was represented at nano-energetics conferences as early as 1998 (Gordon 1998).
Bement was also a director at both Battelle and the Lord Corporation. Battelle (where the anthrax was made) is an organization of “experts in fundamental technologies from the five National Laboratories we manage or co-manage for the US DOE.” Battelle advertises their specialization in nanocomposite coatings (Battelle 2008). The Lord Corporation also makes high-tech coatings for military applications (Lord 2008). In 1999, Lord Corp was working with the Army and NASA on “advanced polymer composites, advanced metals, and multifunctional materials” (Army 1999).
5. Hratch Semerjian, long-time director of NIST’s chemical division, was promoted to acting director of NIST in November 2004, and took over the WTC investigation until the completion of the report on the towers. Semerjian is closely linked to former NIST employee Michael Zachariah, perhaps the world’s most prominent expert on nano-thermites (Zachariah 2008). In fact, Semerjian and Zachariah co-authored ten papers that focus on nano-particles made of silica, ceramics and refractory particles. Zachariah was a major player in the Defense University Research Initiative on Nanotechnology (DURINT), a groundbreaking research effort for nano-thermites.
6. NIST has a long-standing partnership with NASA for the development of new nano-thermites and other nano-technological materials. In fact, Michael Zachariah coordinates this partnership (CNMM 2008).
7. In 2003, two years before the NIST WTC report was issued, the University of Maryland College Park (UMCP) and NIST signed a memorandum of understanding to develop nano-technologies like nano-thermites (NIST 2003). Together, NIST and UMCP have done much work on nano-thermites (NM2 2008).
8. NIST has their own Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology (CNST 2008). Additionally, NIST’s Reactive Flows Group did research on nanostructured materials and high temperature reactions in the mid-nineties (NRFG 1996).
9. Richard Gann, who did the final editing of the NIST WTC report, managed a project called “Next-Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program”, both before and after 9/11. Andrzej Miziolek, another of the world’s leading experts on nano-thermites (Amptiac 2002), is the author of “Defense Applications of Nanomaterials”, and also worked on Richard Gann’s fire suppression project (Gann 2002). Gann’s project was sponsored by DOD’s Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP), an organization that sponsored a number of LLNL’s nano-thermite projects (Simpson 2002, Gash et al 2003).
10. As part of the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer, NIST partners with the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Indian Head (NSWC-IH) on Chemical Science and Technology (FLCTT 2008). NSWC-IH is probably the most prominent US center for nano-thermite technology (NSWC 2008). In 1999, Jan Puszynski, a scientist working for the DURINT program, helped NSWC-IH design a pilot plant to produce nano-size aluminum powder. It was reported that “At that time, this was [the] only reliable source of aluminum nanopowders in the United States” (SDSMT 2001), however, private companies like Argonide and Technanogy were also known to have such capabilities. Among an interesting group of contractors that NSWC-IH hired in 1999 were SAIC, Applied Ordnance, Battelle, Booz Allen Hamilton, Mantech, Titan, Pacific Scientific Energetic (see below), and R Stresau Laboratories for “demolition materials” (NSWC 2000).
A tragic coincidence left William Caswell, an employee of NSWC-IH, dead on Flight 77 when it hit the Pentagon. He had for many years worked on “deepblack” projects at NSWC-IH (Leaf 2007).
The presence of Pacific Scientific Energetics (PSE) in this list of 1999 NSWC-IH contractors is interesting because PSE was the parent company of Special Devices, Inc (SDI). SDI specializes in explosives for defense, aerospace and mining applications, and was acquired in 1998 by John Lehman, 9/11 Commissioner, member of the Project for a New American Century, and former Secretary of the Navy (SDI 2008). Lehman divested in 2001.
With this in mind, it is worthwhile to reiterate that nano-thermite materials were very likely used in the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings, but most certainly played only a part in the plan. However, other high-tech explosives were available to those who had access to nano-thermite materials at the time. Like SDI, several other organizations with links to military, space and intelligence programs (e.g. In-Q-Tel, Orbital Science) have access to many types of high-tech explosives to cut high-strength bolts and produce pyrotechnic events. These organizations also have connections to those who could have accessed the buildings, like WTC tenant Marsh & McLennan and former NASA administrator and Securacom director, James Abrahamson. In any case, it is important for those seeking the truth about 9/11 to consider what organizations and people had access to the technologies that were used to accomplish the deceptive demolition of the WTC buildings. It is also important to recognize the links between those who had access to the technologies, those who had access to the buildings, and those who produced the clearly false official reports. To that end we should note that NIST had considerable connections to nano-thermites, both before and during the WTC investigation. It is therefore inexplicable why NIST did not consider such materials as an explanation for the fires that burned on 9/11, and long afterward at Ground Zero. This fact would not be inexplicable, of course, if those managing the NIST investigation knew to not look, or test, for such materials.
References
Amptiac (2002), Amptiac Quarterly Volume 6, No 1, Special Issue: A Look Inside Nanotechnology, http://www.p2pays.org/ref/15/14610.pdf
Army (1999), Summaries of US Army budget activities, FY 1999 http://www.asafm.army.mil/budget/fybm/fy01/rforms/vol1/vol1.pdf
Army (2008), US Army SBIR 08.2 Proposal Submision Instructions http://www.dodsbir.net/solicitation/sbir082/army082.htm
Battelle (2008), Corporate website for Nanomaterials / Nanotechnology, http://www.battelle.org/solutions/&Nav_SectionID=1&Nav_CatID=1_NanomaterialsNanotechnology
Jordan, JL, Foley JR, Dick, RD, Ferranti L, Thadhani NN, McDowell DL, Austin RA, Benson DJ (2007), Equation of State of Aluminum-Iron Oxide-Epoxy Composite, Air Force Research Lab Eglin AFB FL Munitions Directorate
Chartek (now International Paint) is the maker of Interchar, and they work with NASA http://www.international-pc.com/pc/pds/963to_uk.pdf http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2006/ps_3.html
Choi HJ, Austin R, Allen JK, McDowell DL, Mistree F, Benson DJ (2005), An Approach for Robust Design of Reactive Power Metal Mixtures Based on Non-deterministic Microscale Shock Simulation, Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design, Volume 12, Number 1 / January, 2005
Clapsaddle BJ, Gash AE, Plantier KB, Pantoya ML, Satcher Jr. JH, Simpson RL (2004), Synthesis and Characterization of Mixed Metal Oxide Nanocomposite Energetic Materials, LLNL Report UCRL-PROC-204118
CNMM (2008), NIST/NASA Center for Nano Manufacturing and Metrology http://www.enme.umd.edu/cnmm/
CNST (2008), NIST Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology website http://cnst.nist.gov/
COEM (2004), Advanced Energetic Materials, Committee on Advanced Energetic Materials and Manufacturing Technologies, National Research Council, The National
Academies Press, online book available at— http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php
CRHC (1986), Cooperative Research History Commons, Context of ‘(Mid-1986): Report Rates Vulnerability of Public Areas of WTC to Terrorist Attack as ‘Very High’’ http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp=a86saicreport#a86saicreport
Diaz E, Brousseau P, Ampleman G, Prudhomme RE (2003), Polymer Nanocomposites from Energetic Thermoplastic Elastomers and Alex, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 28, No.4
DOD (2005), US Defense Nanotechnology Research and Development Programs, Department of Defense Director, Defense Research and Engineering, Executive Summary, May 2005, http://www.nano.gov/html/res/DefenseNano2005.pdf
DOD (2007), US Department of Defense, Annual Report on Cooperative Agreements and Other Transactions Entered into during Fiscal Year 2006 Under 10 USC 2371
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/attachments/fy2006caotreporttocongress-signed-20070129.pdf
Douglas, Eric (2006), The NIST WTC Investigation—How Real Was The Simulation?: A review of NIST NCSTAR 1, J 9/11 Studies, December 2006 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf
FLCTT (2008), Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer website http://www.flcmidatlantic.org/interagency_clusters.html
Gann RG (1997), Next-Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program (NGP): A Status Report, Halon Options Technical Working Conference, 6-8 May 1997 http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/866/HOTWC/HOTWC2006/pubs/R0301116.pdf
Gann RG (2002), FY2001 Annual Report Next Generation Fire Suppression Technology Program (NGP), NIST Technical Note 1445, Building and Fire Research Laboratory http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire02/PDF/f02006.pdf
Gash AE, Simpson RL,Tillitson TM, et al (2000), Making Nanostructured Pyrotechnics in a Beaker, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) UCRL-JC-137593, accessed online 16 February 2008, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/247064.pdf
Gash AE, Simpson RL, Satcher JH (2002), Energetic Nanocomposites with Sol-gel Chemistry: Synthesis, Safety, and Characterization, LLNL UCRL-JC-146739, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/244137.pdf
Gash A, Barbee T, Simpson R, Satcher J,.Walton C (2003), Environmentally Benign Stab Detonators, LLNL Report UCRL-TR-201628 http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/303520.pdf
Gordon (1998), Gordon Research Conference on Energetic Materials, June 1998 http://www.grc.org/programs.aspx
Gordon (1999), Gordon Research Conference on Energetic Materials, July 1999 http://www.grc.org/programs.aspx
Gourley J (2007), Appeal Filed with NIST, Pursuant to Earlier Request for Correction, J 9/11 Studies, December 2007 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl.pdf
Griffin, DR (2005), The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True, http://911Review.com/ http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html
Howard SL; Morris JB; Beyer RA; Hamlin SJ; Martin J; Burke GC; Doris T; Laser initiation thresholds of a green aluminum/molybdenum- trioxide metastable intermolecular composite and other pyrotechnics, Proceedings of SPIE, http://cat.inist.fr/
Jones SE, Farrer J, Jenkins GS, Legge F, et al (2008) Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, J 9/11 Studies, http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
Jones SE, Legge FM, Ryan KR, (2008) Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction, The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Volume 2 Issue 1 http://www.benthamopen.org/pages/content.php/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM
Jones SE (2006), Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?, J 9/11 Studies, September 2006, http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/Why_Indeed_Did_the_WTC_Buildings_Completely_Collapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
Jones S E, (2007), Revisiting 9/11/2001--Applying the Scientific Method, J 9/11 Studies, http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
Leaf (2007), The Leaf, White Oak Laboratory Alumni Assoc, Inc, Summer 2007, p 5 http://www.wolaa.org/files/Summer_2007_LEAF.pdf
Legge F (2007), The Twin Towers and Common Sense, J 9/11 Studies, February 2007, http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/g/CraneAndCommonSenseByFrankLegge.pdf
Legge F, and Szamboti, T (2007), 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible, J 9/11 Studies, December 2007 http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Sudden_collapse_initiation_impossible.pdf
LLNL (2000), Science and Technology Review, October 2000, Nanoscale Chemistry Yields Better Explosives, http://www.llnl.gov/str/RSimpson.html
Lord (2008), Lord Corporation website, Coatings http://www.lord.com/Home/ProductsServices/Coatings/AeroglazeAircraftAerospaceCoatings/tabid/3283/Default.aspx
MacQueen G (2006), 118 Witnesses: The Firefighter’s Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers, J 9/11 Studies, August 2006, http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf
Margolis SB, Williams FA (1996), Effect of gas-phase thermal expansion on stability of deflagrations in porous energetic materials. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 22, 69-91
Margolis SB, Williams FA (1999), Structure and Stability of Deflagrations in Porous Energetic Materials, Sandia Report SAND99-8458, Sandia National Laboratories MIT (2008), Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies website, http://web.mit.edu/isn/people/faculty/bazant.html .
Dr. Bazant has also been mentioned with regard to the development of “particles comprising a ‘smart gel’ that responds to a change in its environment”. http://www.azom.com/news.asp
NASA (2001), Glenn Research Center website page on gelled nano-energetics http://sbir.grc.nasa.gov/launch/RACNanotechnologyGelledFuelsDastoorHQ05-2001_brief.pdf .
See also brief description at the following link. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/RT2002/5000/5830palaszewski1.html
NASA (2006), Fire-Resistant Reinforcement Makes Steel Structures Sturdier, NASA website Scientific and Technical Information, Spinoffs 2006 http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2006/ps_3.html
NIST (2003), Announcement of NIST Memorandum of Understanding with the Univerisyt of Maryland, NIST website http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/univmdnanomou.htm
NIST (2005), WTC Report, NCSTAR 1-6A, Passive Fire Protection, p 25 http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6A.pdf
NIST (2007), NCST Advisory Committee Meeting, December 18, 2007, Final Meeting Minutes, http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACMeetingMinutes121807.pdf
NM2 (2008), NIST and UMCP, Co-Laboratory for Nanoparticle Based Manufacturing & Metrology http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/ Northwestern (2008), Civil Engineering Department website resume for Zdenek P. Bazant, “During the last few years, Bazant focused attention on the scaling of thin metallic films and nanocomposites on approach to nanoscale.” http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/resume.pdf
NRFG (1996), NIST’s Reactive Flows Group website, Selected Technical Reports http://www.cstl.nist.gov/div836/836.03/technical.html
NSWC (2000), GovernmentContractsWon.com, Year 2000 Government Contracts - Defense Department http://www.governmentcontractswon.com/department/defense/naval-surface-warfarecenter-in.asp?spg=73&yr=00
NSWC (2008), Webpage for Naval Surface Warfare Center – Indian Head http://www.ih.navy.mil/
ONR (2008), Scaling of Energy Absorption in Composites to Enhance Survivability, Office of Naval Research, ONR grant N00014-02-1-0622, Bazant Z, Northwestern University, http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
Hoffman J, Paul D, Star C (2005), 9/11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands, documentary film available at http://www.wtc7.net/ , http://www.wtc7.net/store/videos/proof/index.html
Pivkina A, Ulyanova P, Frolov Y (2004), Nanomaterials for Heterogeneous Combustion, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 29, No. 1
Prakash A, McCromick A., Zachariah MR (2004), Aero-Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanoporous Iron-Oxide Particles: A Potential Oxidizer for Nanoenergetic Materials, Chem. Mater., 16(8):1466-1471 http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2004_CM_FeO.pdf
Prakash, A, McCormick AV, Zachariah MR (2005), Synthesis and Reactivity of a Super- Reactive Metastable Intermolecular Composite Formulation of Al/KMnO4, Adv Mater 2005, 17, No. 7 April 4 http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2005_Adv_Mat_KMnO4.pdf
Rai A, Zhou L, Prakash A, McCormick A, Zachariah MR (2005), Understanding and Tuning the Reactivity of Nano-Energetic Materials, Mat Res Soc Sym Proc, 2006, Vol 896, pages 99-110
Ryan K (2006), What is 9/11 Truth? - The First Steps, J 9/11 Studies, August 2006 http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_1_Ryan5.pdf
Ryan K (2007), Looking for Truth in Credentials: The Peculiar WTC “Experts”, Global Research, March 13, 2007, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php=RYA20070313&articleId=5071
Ryan K (2008), Another Amazing Coincidence Related to the WTC, http://911blogger.com/ , http://www.911blogger.com/node/13272
SAIC (2004), Science Applications International Corporation, Annual Report 2004 http://www.saic.com/news/pdf/Annual-Report2004.pdf
SDMST (2001), South Dakota School of Mines and Technology website, Research Experience for Teachers, Current Projects 2001 http://ret.sdsmt.edu/projectdescr.htm
SDI (2008), Special Devices Incorporated website, History http://www.specialdevices.com/company/history.htm
Simpson RL (2002), Safe and Environmentally Acceptable Sol-Gel-Derived Pyrophoric Pyrotechnics, SERDP Pollution Prevention PP-1276 http://www.serdp.org/Research/upload/PP-1276.pdf
Son SF, Yetter R, Yang V (2007), Introduction: Nanoscale Composite Energetic Materials, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 23, No. 4, July–August 2007
Son (2008), Steven Son energetic materials webpage at Purdue University http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~sson/composites_files/slide0001.htm
Tillotson TM, Simpson RL, Hrubesh LW (1999), Nanostructure High Explosives Using Sol-gel Chemistry, 98-ERD-048, LLNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Annual Report FY1999, http://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/238334.pdf (p 8-11 or 181 of 255)
Tillotson, TM, Hrubesh, Simpson RL Lee RS, Swansiger RW, Simpson LR (1998), Sol-Gel Processing of Energetic Materials, J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 225, 358
Telengator AM, Margolis SB, Williams FA (1998), Ignition Analysis of a Porous Energetic Material—II. Ignition at a Closed Heated End, Sandia National Laboratory, Sandia Report SAND98-8655, November 1998
University of Idaho Magazine, Fall 2002, p 15 http://www.uidaho.edu/herewehaveidaho/PDF/Fall2002.pdf
Zahcariah (2008), Faculty webpage for Michael Zachariah http://www.enme.umd.edu/facstaff/fac-profiles/zachariah.html
Zhao L, Clapsaddle BJ, Satcher Jr. JH, Schaefer DW, Shea KJ, (2004), Integrated Chemical Systems: the Simultaneous Formation of Hybrid Nanocomposites of Iron Oxide and Organo Silsesquioxanes, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRLJRNL-207355 http://e-reportsext.llnl.gov/pdf/312801.pdf
Repost
Homepage:
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
Comments
Hide the following 11 comments
Stop this irrelevant spamming
05.07.2008 11:43
Go away you bore.
yawn, yet more bad science
05.07.2008 18:21
a scientist
Amazing!
06.07.2008 00:57
One of them knows another one!
But they didn't think of "nanothermite" as a cause of a building falling down. The fools! They let that big plane twatting into the side of the tower blind them to the possibility that a type of material had been secretly coated onto the supports underneath the fire-retardant coating at some unknown point in the past.
Now it's all clear, the scales fall from our eyes and the world has become peaceful.
Oh wait....
CH
Normal chemicla reactions change at a nano level, ask any nanoscientist,stop act
06.07.2008 14:08
James Dean
Hey "scientist"
06.07.2008 17:06
Thermite of any flavour is NOT an explosive.
Have you read the papers on nano-thermites? You might start, before making comments where you are proved wrong.
"Nanothermite composites containing metallic fuel and inorganic oxidizer are gaining importance due to their outstanding combustion characteristics. In this paper, the combustion behaviors of copper oxide/aluminum nanothermites are discussed. CuO nanorods were synthesized using the surfactant-templating method, then mixed or self-assembled with Al nanoparticles. This nanoscale mixing resulted in a large interfacial contact area between fuel and oxidizer. As a result, the reaction of the low density nanothermite composite leads to a fast propagating combustion, generating shock waves with Mach numbers up to 3."
©2007 American Institute of Physics
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=APPLAB000091000024243109000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
Reader
links
06.07.2008 17:13
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_thermite_connection.html
Reader
Homepage: http://911review.com
Nano distraction
06.07.2008 18:59
"The amazing correlation between floors of impact and floors of apparent failure suggests that spray-on nano-thermite materials may have been applied to the steel components of the WTC buildings, underneath the upgraded fireproofing (Ryan 2008)."
which appears to be saying that because the towers' structure failed at the point where a big plane hit them, this is evidence that novel forms of thermite were applied underneath the fireproofing.
I hope you can see how nonsensical and illogical that is.
This whole article is missing the point in spectacular fashion. Nanothermites, interesting. Any evidence of a link to the towers? Only if you presuppose that they were already there. It's nonsense.
CH
The basics, for those who haven't yet taken a look
06.07.2008 23:54
It sounds like you need to go back and do a lot of catching up on the research that shows that it is impossible for the destruction to have been caused by gravity alone and that the collapse -- regardless of how it started -- would have been arrested over time.
It's not about "because the towers' structure failed at the point where a big plane hit them," it's about how the event was likely engineered.
It sounds illogical to you because you aren't actually considering it. If one were going to bring down a building and make it look like fire caused it, would one leave the whole initiation mechanism up to chance? Or would one want to be able to ensure that the initiation event started where one wanted it to start?
These are basics of logic.
I recommend you start with these articles about the collapse events:
Momentum Transfer Analysis of the Collapse of the Upper Storeys of WTC1
Gordon Ross, ME
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf
9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible
Dr. Frank Legge and Tony Szamboti, ME
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200703/Sudden_collapse_initiation_impossible.pdf
9/11 – Proof of Explosive Demolition without Calculations
Frank Legge, Ph.D.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/LeggeVerticalCollapseWTC7_6.pdf
There are many more like these.
Reader
Not basics of logic
08.07.2008 11:03
Facts:
* plane hits building
* building collapses from that point
2 alternative theories:
* Plane strike causes building collapse.
* Plane strike used to initiate explosives in demolition.
I would suggest that the 2nd is only plausible if you already believe that our building was brought down by explosives in a demolition, since the presence of explosives is by no means a widely accepted fact (to put it mildly).
I would also suggest that it's a very strange scientific journal that publishes papers proclaiming "proof" of one thing or another. Modest people, scientists, at least in print. Every paper I've read, even (especially) the ones that turn out to be epoch-making is written in very understated language. "Evidence for X" is the strongest it gets in the journals. The paper pinning down the double helix as structure of DNA doesn't say that's what it is until the last paragraph, "it has not escaped our notice that this provides a potential explanation of...." if I remember right.
But it isn't just modesty that prevents people from calling their papers "Proof that...". It's a recognition of the difficulty of finding absolute proof rather than collection of evidence that becomes overwhelming. 911 truthers don't have that, they have apparent anomalies, and there anomalies everywhere, just ask Fortean Times or William Corliss.
Which is to say, I doubt the bona fides of the Journal of 911 Studies like I doubt the bona fides of the Institute for Creation Research. Journals set up to prove a point of view aren't the place to find the truth.
CH
The problem is when you realize it might be true
08.07.2008 15:10
It's always funny to me to see the anarchists and peace activists treating those they disagree with in the same way that the ruling class treats them -- derogatory labels and smears.
The labels are about what's threatening to someone, not about the facts. And it's normal. We're all human.
But the fact is, the structural engineers will disagree with you. That is, the ones that look at the numbers (who are not part of the NIST production team) and who weigh both sides.
Because Richard Gage is a registered and professional working architect ( http://www.ae911truth.org/), and has presented his positions at local level AIA events, he's gotten the notice of some engineers and so now there are a number of them in agreement with the position that explosives may have been involved. Not because they haven't looked at the facts, but because they have.
The vast majority of those who brush aside the views of the "creation research institute" of 9/11 have not actually read the facts being presented on both sides, examined the analyses closely, or know how to. They feel threatened by it and they throw around labels and then walk away.
Here's a small collection of some engineers who have now gone on the record in support of demolition or with such serious questions about the official version that they are calling for a new investigation --
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Prominent Structural Engineers Say Official Version of 9/11 "Impossible" "Defies Common Logic" "Violates the Law of Physics"
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/05/prominent-structural-engineers-say.html
The full info is at
http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=ENG
Ask any engineer who says the demolition theory is bogus, if they've read the NIST report.
Then ask what they've read of the papers or seen the presentations by Gage, Jones, Ryan, Hoffman, etc.
Chances are, they've only read a newspaper story and looked at one website, at a glance, or Loose Change, and that's the full spectrum of their awareness.
The hardest part is to realize that it might be true and as long as you never really look at it, or just throw labels around, you don't have to consider that possibility seriously.
A good paper by Dr. Laurie Manwell on the issue of the psychological barriers is here --
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/FaultyTowersofBeliefPart_I.pdf
It's not "demolition nuttery", it's a serious paper about the issues that people have coping with this information, and why they have them. Here she is at the Neuroscience Day at her university in Canada (scroll down) --
http://www.uoguelph.ca/nacs/page.cfm?id=169&newsID=18&a=1
The main thing the labels do is try to keep you from looking at all, because once you do, that's it.
Reader
Carry on cassandra
09.07.2008 10:34
See where the Creation Science analogy continues to be apt?
Thanks for reminding me of the futility of engaging with true believers of any stripe.
CH