60 years wiping the smirk of the NHS
iosaf | 18.06.2008 13:44 | Health
This really is a tale of human interest. Flicking through the online pages of today's British Press I learn how in future (after the 60th anniversary of the NHS) British nurses are to be rated on their smileyness. After choking on my meusli and recovering from a mild cerebral apoplexy, I thought the implications of this little scrap of news are just too good to be missed by the kind of people who don't read newspapers anymore but still might rely on the NHS. Please note there is no need to encourage consultants or hosptial managers to be smiley.
you really can't fake smiles - top scientists have proved it.
According to the hallowed pages of Wikipedia, the NHS is the fourth largest employer on planet Earth. Only the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Indian Railways, and Wal-Mart employ more people directly. So.., if this morning's "Guardian" is telling the truth then the precendent to be set by enforcing smiley nurses might soon influence the rank and file of the CPLA, Indian Railways and Wal-Mart.
I don't know what mental image either the Chinese People's Liberation Army or Wal-Mart conjure in your mind, but I'm sure delighted chortling grinning conscripts is not one of them. Perhaps it is though, perhaps you are one of those people who eschews the prudery filter on your "google image" search engine and as soon as you type in "happy nurse" all you get is stethoscope pornography.
How does one (meaning you!) discern a sincere smile of a person happy to see you from the contented almost beatific countenance of another person who thinks only of easing your pain and woe from the supercilious lofty smirk of the more than averagely pretty modern nurse who feeds his or her smack or amphetamine habit by substituting your hourly injections with watered down ketamine?
How indeed.
The idea that happy smiley employees and upbeat cheering environments can ease illness or suffering is not new. Nor alas is the notion that such promoting employment behavioural guidelines which impose what are supposed to be spontanous and sincere human emotions wallpaper the cracks of institutional failure. I remember choking on my meusli last year upon reading that the Her Majesty's prison service was considering painting the interiors of prisons pink as some US jailors had already done in an attempt to dampen down aggressive macho attitudes. Though in fairness to Her Majesty's houses of pleasure the US wardens dressed their inmates in pink jumpsuits, not only as another example of "cruel and unusual punishment" their constitution outlaws for the jolly good reason that they seem to have a prediliction to inventing ever new ways to cruelly and unusually castigate. (c/f http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7138110.stm http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,294030,00.html )
I suggest that if you have time to have a go at the NHS - you don't begin with the facial muscles of nurses. Nor do you begin with the frankly perverse setting of uninforceable standards of homogenousity - we may not tell a man or woman who is not happy to smile nor more than we can tell a specialised surgeon it's time s/he cleaned a toilet -
For, as most nurses and even medical students know - & certainly anyone with even a passing interest in psychology or any job involved in assessing truthful emotions in others -
YOU CAN'T FAKE A SMILE.
That was properly intellectually discovered and written up in leather bound volume editions by Guillaume Duchenne (1806-1875) a French neurologist after whom the sincerely cheery zygomatic muscular contractions were named "Duchenne smile".
You may see an illustration of his sterling work with this article.
Of course it is true that if you laugh a lot you might, just might, avoid getting sick. So rather than apply the paliative measure of smiley nurses instead of solidarity poor surgeons - we could encourage people in wider society to laugh more. Let's rule out pink jumpsuits except for surgeons. Yes. that's the way to go. Dress Harley street in pink and issue hourly broadcasts of its finest unblocking toilets.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The history of the NHS can be read here :-
be warned it's heavy reading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_%28England%29#Scandals
"Nurses to be rated on how Smiley and Compassionate they are"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/18/nhs60.nhs1
I don't know what mental image either the Chinese People's Liberation Army or Wal-Mart conjure in your mind, but I'm sure delighted chortling grinning conscripts is not one of them. Perhaps it is though, perhaps you are one of those people who eschews the prudery filter on your "google image" search engine and as soon as you type in "happy nurse" all you get is stethoscope pornography.
How does one (meaning you!) discern a sincere smile of a person happy to see you from the contented almost beatific countenance of another person who thinks only of easing your pain and woe from the supercilious lofty smirk of the more than averagely pretty modern nurse who feeds his or her smack or amphetamine habit by substituting your hourly injections with watered down ketamine?
How indeed.
The idea that happy smiley employees and upbeat cheering environments can ease illness or suffering is not new. Nor alas is the notion that such promoting employment behavioural guidelines which impose what are supposed to be spontanous and sincere human emotions wallpaper the cracks of institutional failure. I remember choking on my meusli last year upon reading that the Her Majesty's prison service was considering painting the interiors of prisons pink as some US jailors had already done in an attempt to dampen down aggressive macho attitudes. Though in fairness to Her Majesty's houses of pleasure the US wardens dressed their inmates in pink jumpsuits, not only as another example of "cruel and unusual punishment" their constitution outlaws for the jolly good reason that they seem to have a prediliction to inventing ever new ways to cruelly and unusually castigate. (c/f http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7138110.stm http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,294030,00.html )
I suggest that if you have time to have a go at the NHS - you don't begin with the facial muscles of nurses. Nor do you begin with the frankly perverse setting of uninforceable standards of homogenousity - we may not tell a man or woman who is not happy to smile nor more than we can tell a specialised surgeon it's time s/he cleaned a toilet -
For, as most nurses and even medical students know - & certainly anyone with even a passing interest in psychology or any job involved in assessing truthful emotions in others -
YOU CAN'T FAKE A SMILE.
That was properly intellectually discovered and written up in leather bound volume editions by Guillaume Duchenne (1806-1875) a French neurologist after whom the sincerely cheery zygomatic muscular contractions were named "Duchenne smile".
You may see an illustration of his sterling work with this article.
Of course it is true that if you laugh a lot you might, just might, avoid getting sick. So rather than apply the paliative measure of smiley nurses instead of solidarity poor surgeons - we could encourage people in wider society to laugh more. Let's rule out pink jumpsuits except for surgeons. Yes. that's the way to go. Dress Harley street in pink and issue hourly broadcasts of its finest unblocking toilets.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The history of the NHS can be read here :-
be warned it's heavy reading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Service_%28England%29#Scandals
"Nurses to be rated on how Smiley and Compassionate they are"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/jun/18/nhs60.nhs1
iosaf
Comments
Hide the following comment
Florence Nightingale says "Workers of the World unite! Grin & Bear it!"
19.06.2008 14:40
We don't expect barristers to be either friendly or polite.
We very much expect barristas at coffee shops to be chirpy, drug free & upbeat.
That is another difference between "fees" and "wages", with the salaried folks in between.
After I had submitted yesterday's article, I thought about the conscripts of the Chinese National army of Liberation and Wal-Mart - the 1st and 3rd largest employers on the planet.
One of the most popular kitschy images in recent years of government supported cultural activity in Europe (I can think of examples from the UK to France to Barcelona) has been reworkings Maoist era paintings of happy chirpy full toothy grinning Red Army boys and girls.
We see through their smiles now, so they've become art.
But the thinking behind such suggestions, be they for nurses in the NHS who despite their shitty working conditions are expected to be as ho-ho-ho as a seasonal Father Christmas (or Santa Claus if you're hispanic) or the barristas who serve up coffee or whatever under appreciated worker you can think of - is pandemic. The Irish next door despite destroying in their last general election the neo-liberal coalition party "the Progressive Democrats" saw its only remaining MP continue in her role as minister of Health. The nurses unions won't even talk to her let alone smile. Yet the debate on the privitisation of Irish health hinges on languages of "customer care" as this week's "Irish Times" online debate shows :-
in defence of their "NHS" http://www.ireland.com/head2head/yes.html
against their "NHS" http://www.ireland.com/head2head/no.html
http://scripts.ireland.com/polls/head2head/index.cfm?fuseaction=yesnopoll&pollid=8372&subsiteid=352
That debate of quality care is had in a land which invented the portable (or mobile ambulance) cardiac defibrillator yet still doesn't offer one for everyone of its hospitals or counties or even towns. Despite its amazing wealth..,
Grin & Bear it.
iosaf