Is Melanie Phillips a war criminal?
jackslucid | 16.05.2008 08:34 | Anti-militarism | Anti-racism | Terror War
"The prerequisite for stabilising all these hotspots — including “Israel/Palestine” — and dealing with global Islamic terror is regime change in Tehran."
So says loyal british citizen Melanie ...
So says loyal british citizen Melanie ...
In an artice that no-one in their right mind would write, our dear loyal Ms Phillips, writing for the Jewish Chronical, suggests a remedy for the M.E. ills ... Iranian genocide!?!
Link:
http://www.thejc.com/Home.aspx?ParentId=m12s32s35&AId=59702&ATypeId=1&secid=35&prev=true
A taster:
"People say war against Iran would turn a largely pro-western people against the West. But war need not mean carpet-bombing Tehran. It can and should mean targeted strikes on the regime and its principal interests.
War should always be a last resort. But, as in the 1930s, the West once again has failed to take the appropriate intermediate steps. Such a failure of nerve makes war more likely, not less.
As a result, the choice is not between war and peace. War with Iran is almost certainly inevitable. The choice is between war on our terms or on those laid down by Iran. The longer we wait, the more that choice is loaded against the defeat of this most lethal of all threats to the free world."
Is there any limit on the depraved nature of such an obnoxious warmonger and open fascist?
Nope.
Drop her a line if you have a strong stomach and can be bothered to be ignored or insulted;
melanie@melaniephillips.com
Link:
http://www.thejc.com/Home.aspx?ParentId=m12s32s35&AId=59702&ATypeId=1&secid=35&prev=true A taster:
"People say war against Iran would turn a largely pro-western people against the West. But war need not mean carpet-bombing Tehran. It can and should mean targeted strikes on the regime and its principal interests.
War should always be a last resort. But, as in the 1930s, the West once again has failed to take the appropriate intermediate steps. Such a failure of nerve makes war more likely, not less.
As a result, the choice is not between war and peace. War with Iran is almost certainly inevitable. The choice is between war on our terms or on those laid down by Iran. The longer we wait, the more that choice is loaded against the defeat of this most lethal of all threats to the free world."
Is there any limit on the depraved nature of such an obnoxious warmonger and open fascist?
Nope.
Drop her a line if you have a strong stomach and can be bothered to be ignored or insulted;
melanie@melaniephillips.com
jackslucid
e-mail:
jackslucid@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following comment
genocide ... apparently its relative
16.05.2008 12:06
...and for those posters who could not be included in this thread, due to their extreme lack of lucid responses, this genocide would extend to 'their own side'[sic].
Is it not obvious that Iran will not roll over and let the imperial designs of an amerikan/israeli alliance & Ms Phillips unfold without a response?
Like it or not, this response will include a direct attack upon israeli assets, from thence the 'nuclear' option has been freely opined by neutral and non-neutral sources alike, in the daily specticle of ratcheting up the war fever, as the most favoured option.
The likelyhood of casualties in figures that SHOULD warrent the epithet of genocide is high even without this option (notwithstanding the ADLs definition, which remains exclusive!).
Anyone advocating a course of action that is likely to lead to genocide, are they not by definition a war criminal?
jackslucid
e-mail:
jackslucid@hotmail.com