Skip to content or view screen version

Royal Blackmail - This week's grapevine rumour

Buzzard of Elijah | 16.04.2008 21:49 | Analysis | Other Press

Could the Linley rumours be correct? No special treatment under the law for royals. Radar has named David Armstrong Jones, Viscount Linley (12th in line to the throne!), as the victim of England's new tabloid blackmail obsession.

David Armstrong Jones, Viscount Linley (12th in line to the throne!)
David Armstrong Jones, Viscount Linley (12th in line to the throne!)


If I've learned anything from the Internet it's this: The "mainstream media" is nothing but a propaganda outlet for the government, big business and the owners. Sibel should just speak. If they lock her up the backlash will bring down the whole rotten system.

Yeah, the US media, a mouthpiece for BUSH, that's why the media like him, and his ratings are so low. Makes sense, to a comatose retard like yourself. Viscount Lindley - the Queens nephew -the name of the royal fellow your media are unable to print due to laws preventing the publishing of names. The US had the name because the government does not control the media.
 http://amusinghistorymusings.blogspot.com/2008/01/god-save-us-all-from-fools-and-idiots.html



Queen’s nephew named in blackmail plot
 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/category/viscount-lindley/

Posted in Royal Family, Buckingham Palace, Princess Margaret, David Lindley, Viscount Lindley, Huffington Post on October 30th, 2007

Update 3 : It’s being reported that the victim of this blackmail plot is about “to go public”. Since his name is now widely known, his side of the story should be put frankly and fearlessly.

A nephew of the Queen is being named as the victim in the Royal blackmail plot. His name is now being widely touted on the internet, including the authoritative Huffington Post, quoting the Radar publication.

British journalist Nicholas Davies, author of three books on the Royal Family, revealed the name during a phone interview on American TV. Speaking from his Surrey home, Davies told host Martha MacCullum, “This is absolute nonsense, […] would never be involved in anything like this. It is a con trick which exploded in their face.”

The Huff reports, “British law prohibits any of them from naming the hard-partying royal. As the tale goes, two men demanded £50,000 from 45-year-old […] in return for footage allegedly showing a royal aide talking of gay sex with him. The aide is also allegedly seen on a video tape taking cocaine from an envelope embossed with […] name.”

The Queen will be dismayed as he was always one of the good guys, as will his wife […].

Update : The Telegraph online is reporting that the Queen will stand by her nephew in the current blackmail case and has offered her “unswerving support”.

The paper “has learnt that the Queen, who is very fond of her relative, is dismayed by the effect the revelation of an alleged £50,000 extortion attempt is having on him and his family”.

One source said: “It is a fraught time for him. He is grateful for the support of the Queen and other members of the Royal Family.”

 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/category/viscount-lindley/


 http://ph.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071031133522AAY3s1F
The name of Viscount David Linley has come up as the target of the blackmail of the British royal family. His name, which had been circulating on blogs for some hours, was announced for the first time yesterday evening by a British journalist, Nicholas Davies, interviewed by telephone on the Fox News “Desk Live” Show.

 http://gawker.com/news/scandal/david-armstrong+jones-is-the-royal-victim-of-wacky-uk-gay-coke-extortion-316307.php

Buzzard of Elijah
- Homepage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Armstrong-Jones,_Viscount_Linley#Blackmail_allegation

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Hmmmm.... not indymedia news really is it

17.04.2008 09:08

royal celebrity nonsense has no place on the wire

?


Oh dear.

17.04.2008 12:37

Do you really think blackmail victims should be "outed"? What next, naming rape victims?

If someone's done something against the law, and they are convicted, that should be public and they should be identified. If someone is the victim of a crime, that could damage their reputation, then why the need to publicise them unless you're some saddo gossip-hound?

You talk as if you think the Royal family member has been getting special, favourable treatment. The opposite is clearly true in this case - papers wouldn't usually try out blackmail victims to that extent.

So: what's been your amazing bit of journalism? Oh yes, printed by international newspapers for months (including several owned by Murdoch) and repeated on blogs. Woo-hoo. Big blow to the mainstream media.

Meanwhile the Times uses an FOI request to blow a hole in the Government's lies about the sailors captured by the Iranians. That story alone pisses all over this.


Norville B