Skip to content or view screen version

High Court Rules BAE Corruption investigation ended UNLAWFULLY

j | 10.04.2008 15:09 | Anti-militarism | London | World

---

The High Court ruled today that the Serious Fraud Office acted UNLAWFULLY in ending
their investigation into corruption allegations against BAE systems, Britain's
largest arms company.


BAE Systems had been under investigation from July 2004, after allegations that it
had bribed Saudi officials to win contracts for arms deals. The 'Al Yamamah'
contract, signed in the 1980s under Thatcher's government, was for BAE to supply
Saudi Arabia with dozens of military aircraft, despite the country's unenviable
human rights record.

In December 2007, just as the investigating body were getting somewhere - the SFO
were just about to get access to Swiss bank accounts - the investigation was
suddently terminated. (This was after BAE had already leant on the attorney
general to halt the inquiry in October 2005.)

The SFO are supposedly an independent prosecuting organisation. Despite this, the
Blair government directly intervened to stop the SFO continuing its work, saying
that it had already cost a lot of money, it would mean job losses at BAE, and most
importantly that it could hurt relations with the Saudi government. It was claimed
that the Saudis had tried to blackmail them, by threatening to withhold intelligence
on terrorists.

Whether this was true, or whether the decision was made to cynically protect BAE's
corporate interests, is a matter for you to decide.


Campaign Against the Arms Trade and Cornerhouse anti-corruption publishers launched
a David v Goliath legal battle to challenge the SFO's decision. Today the judges
were scathing of the government and the SFO, and ruled that they had acted
unlawfully in halting the investigation.
Ruling:
 http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2008/04/10/judgment_corner_house_100408.pdf

Today's High Court victory confirms the fact that BAE Systems is a corrupt and
extremely powerful company, which is able to manipulate the government at the
highest level. It shows that the government are also perfectly willing to sacrifice
their supposed democratic mandate, to assist the fat-cat bosses in their aim to
fatten their already bulging wallets on the backs of those killed by BAE's products.


The British government remain under investigation for corruption by international
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). The repurcussions
for the government as a result of that, and today's ruling, remain to be seen.

j

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

UK trots out 'terrorist threat' again to justify illegality

10.04.2008 20:49

The British government should not be worried about the Saudis passing on information about 'terrorists'. Saudi Arabia is an autocratic torture state, and any 'information' passed on to the British or anyone else will have been 'extracted' by torture, that is, 'extracted' from people who will say or admit to anything in order to stop the pain of deliberate torture, and cannot be relied upon. So the powers-that-be cannot try and use the usual, catch-all, 'fear of the Terrorist Threat' as a get-out clause, in its murky ties with either multi-national death dealers or their despotic 'customers'.

IanVincible


let's really get to the bottom of this

10.04.2008 22:21

the judges state that it's the government that has acted unlawfully but it's individuals who took the decisions. one of those individuals was the lying, corrupt, cowardly, psychopathic, genocidal, war criminal prime minister at the time. at least one of the other lying corrupt parasites was the attorney general. both of these individuals have names and addresses. i'm sure even our bumbling legal system should be able to track these 2 international criminals down.

cut through to the individuals