Skip to content or view screen version

UK attacked Iraq for oil – poll

Paul Collins | 10.03.2008 13:16 | Globalisation | Iraq | Workers' Movements

A larger number of people believe that Britain invaded Iraq to gain control of its oil than for any other reason, a new ICM poll for War on Want says today.

NEWS HOOK: Fifth anniversary of the Iraq war

Saturday, 15 March 2008 – global demonstrations, including London and Glasgow

Monday, 10 March 2008

UK attacked Iraq for oil – poll

More people now think Britain invaded Iraq to gain control of the country’s oil than for any other reason, a new poll reveals today.

In the ICM poll, commissioned by the anti-poverty group War on Want, “to gain control of Iraq’s oil” is the top motive cited for the invasion, ahead of disarming Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, removing Saddam Hussein over human rights, or to stop Iraq supporting international terrorism.

The same holds true among supporters of all the three main political parties, according to the survey of British voters, undertaken in the run-up to the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.

The poll comes before national demonstrations on Saturday (15 March) in London, Glasgow and around the world to mark the anniversary of the conflict.

It is published on the day people holding shares in British oil corporation BP receive a huge increase in their dividend as the company, along with Shell and other oil firms, seeks to control the development, production and depletion of Iraq’s oil reserves.

War on Want says Iraq would lose billions of pounds in oil income under proposals which the UK and US governments are pressing the Baghdad administration to sign.

Two in three Iraqis oppose these plans, according to a survey published last year by development and human rights organisations, including War on Want, Platform and Oil Change International. This majority of Iraqis would prefer the oil to be developed and produced by Iraqi public sector companies.

Since 2003 both Shell and BP have lobbied for control of Iraq’s oil and steered Iraqi oil legislation for the past 20 months. Both companies worked on Iraq’s hydrocarbon law and had access to the text for eight months before Iraqi MPs received copies.

Iraqi trade unions say the law will allow oil companies power over new fields for 25 years, with the country’s economy run by overseas firms. According to the unions, the proposed law would surrender Iraq’s economic sovereignty, undermine the development of Iraq’s workforce and increase unemployment.

Ruth Tanner, senior campaigns officer at War on Want, said: “Five years on from the invasion, people are clear that oil was the real reason Britain attacked Iraq. Now companies such as BP and Shell are lining up to take control of Iraq’s oil for a generation. Iraqi oil should be used to rebuild Iraq, not to swell the profits of oil multinationals.”

NOTES TO EDITORS:

*According to the poll, 25 per cent of people identify taking control of Iraq’s oil as the actual purpose for Britain going to war, compared to 17 per cent who think its motive was disarming Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. Another 16 per cent feel Britain embarked on war to remove Saddam Hussein over human rights. And 10 per cent say the UK launched hostilities to stop Iraq supporting international terrorism. A further 19 per cent attribute the war to “another reason”, while 13 per cent don’t know.

*ICM interviewed a random sample of 1004 adults aged 18 upwards by telephone between 27 and 28 February 2008. Interviews were conducted across Britain and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules. Further information is available at www.icmresearch.co.uk

*People holding BP shares today (10 March) receive a 31 per cent rise in the quarterly dividend to 13.525 cents.

*London campaigners will assemble in Trafalgar Square at 12 noon on Saturday (15 March) for the demonstration to mark the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war. Glasgow protestors will gather at 11.30 am in Blythswood Square. The demonstrations are organised by the Stop the War Coalition, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the British Muslim Initiative.

*Journalist and author Naomi Klein will address a London public meeting on 19 May about the corporate takeover of Iraq, organised by War on Want and other groups in the Hands Off Iraqi Oil campaign. More details on the events page at www.waronwant.org

CONTACT: Paul Collins, War on Want media office (+44) (0)20 7549 0584 or (+44) (0)7983 550728


Paul Collins
- e-mail: pcollins@waronwant.org
- Homepage: http://www.waronwant.org

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

So...

10.03.2008 15:46

So, 75% of people do not believe that the main reason Iraq was invaded was to take control of the countries oil supplies - that is a fairly substantial majority.

BP


..which is more than

10.03.2008 16:40

This is the proportion of people who attributed control of Iraqi oil as THE MAIN REASON, which is more importantly more than those following the Nu Snaga line.

What we can tell from this is that there is a consensus that the invasion/occupation happened for a variety of reasons.

anarchoneilist


@ BP

11.03.2008 16:16

This is not a 75% majority saying "not for oil" unless you also say:

83% say "not for WMD"
84% say "not for human rights"
81% say "one of oil/WMD/HR"
87% say "I do know why"

That's no longer a majority and you fail at stats. You can't take a multiple choice question with 5 answers and read anything meaningful by looking at just one of the answers.

MonkeyBot 5000


Oil invasion problems

13.03.2008 17:03

The problem with the question is that people believe that Britain followed the US into war, so the question is 'was control of oil the mean reason for the US invasion.

People must be stupid to believe that it was WMD, human rights or international terrorism or rather people are just confused.

People know that the US is spending trillions on Iraq. Why go to war for profit and then spend trillions on it that will bankrupt you?

People are right to be confused. There are other reasons behind the US-UK venture.

insidejob