Skip to content or view screen version

Wikileaks censored by US Court

imc-uk-features | 24.02.2008 11:57 | Repression | World

Transparency website Wikileaks has been muzzled with a legal injunction by a US court following the publication of leaked documents about a Swiss bank implicated in alleged money laundering. The anonymous whistleblower site, devoted to battle against corruption and censorship, published several hundred documents from a Swiss banking whistleblower purportedly showing that Bank Julius Baer and its Cayman Islands subsidiary had been involved in offshore tax evasion and money laundering by extremely wealthy and, in some cases, politically sensitive clients from the US, Europe, China and Peru. Rather than ordering the removal of specific documents, however, the San Francisco District Court ordered Wikileak's DNS registrar, Dynadot, to remove all DNS hosting records for the wikileaks.org domain name and prevent it from resolving to the wikileaks.org website or any other website or server other than a blank park page. There have also been reports of attempts to lock down the site through Denial of Service attacks and threats to its DNS record.

From the newswire: US judge arranges summary execution of Wikileaks.org | US Court order shuts down Wikileaks.org | US court attacks web freedom, enjoins Wikileaks.org out of existence | Wikileaks and Internet Censorship: a comparative study | Full correspondence between Wikileaks and Bank Julius Baer | Reports elsewhere: IndyBay | Indymedia Ireland | About Wikileaks



Wikileaks has published important leaked documents in the past, such as the Rules of Engagement for Iraq, the Guantanamo Camp Delta Standard Operating Procedures and evidence of major bank fraud in Kenya that apparently affected the Kenyan elections. It has recently faced similar legal threats after publishing a confidential briefing memo relating to the dramatic collapse of the Northern Rock bank.

Knowing that governments and institutions will go to extreme lengths to censor the truth, its founders had created an extensive network of cover names from which one can access their materials or continue leaking secret documents. Thus, while Wikileaks.org is down, other mirrors (copies of the site) are still up and running, like wikileaks.be. The site can also still be accessed via its IP address in Sweden.

imc-uk-features

Additions

Judge reverses wikileaks ban

02.03.2008 15:29

The ban has been taken down and no order will be made until the legal case ends, and even the disputed documents are now legally available. In reality the site was always available.

Danny
- Homepage: http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/02/29


Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Bullet proof hosting

24.02.2008 16:29

No offence to IM, I'm sure the term 'bullet proof hosting' means quite another thing to someone like Usmanov, but rreallly, wikiLeaks is still up. I wonder if wikiLeaks has recieved any documents from Craig yet ?

"
Also making a take-down difficult, Wikileaks maintains its own servers at undisclosed locations, keeps no logs and uses military-grade encryption to protect sources and other confidential information, according to an unidentified individual who answered a press inquiry sent to Wikileaks.

"Wikileaks certainly trusts no hosting provider," the person wrote.

There's a name for arrangements such as these. It's called "bulletproof hosting," and it's historically been used to insulate online criminal gangs against take-down efforts by law enforcers or private parties. As Wikileaks has demonstrated, the measure can also be used by those engaging in civil disobedience. Wikileaks uses a different term: "an uncensorable system for untraceable mass document leaking."
"
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/21/wikileaks_bulletproof_hosting/

Ivan Fyodorovich


ISPs sell your web history

27.02.2008 20:32

This is an unrelated tech story with no original content but I think it is of equal interest to other keyboard-activists. If you surf with BT, Virgin or Talk Talk you have to opt out to stop your web-history being resold. So far they have sold this information to an advertising company but presumably they will sell it to anyone.

BT pimped customer web data to advertisers last summer
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/27/bt_phorm_121media_summer_2007/

"For years, Internet service providers have watched with envy as the likes of Google, Yahoo and Microsoft sliced up the online advertising pie. Selling Internet access has been a good business, but selling Web advertising has been an even more lucrative one. Now, three Internet providers in Britain have teamed up to try to obtain a piece of online advertising for themselves. The three companies — BT, Carphone Warehouse and Virgin Media — announced a deal last week with a company called Phorm, whose technology tracks Web users and sends them ads related to their interests."
 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/technology/18target.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Also:
 http://www.badphorm.co.uk
 http://www.cableforum.co.uk/article/377/virgin-media-signs-targeted-ad-deal

Danny