Skip to content or view screen version

Carmel Agrexco Blockaded Again

wallmustfall | 11.02.2008 15:49 | Anti-racism | London | South Coast

PRESS RELEASE

For IMMEADIATE RELEASE

Protesters Blockade Israeli State Owned Company

Press contact:

07986 764432

07745 817822

 thewallmustfall@riseup.net



11 February 2008

From around 3pm today Palestine solidarity demonstrators have today been blockading Carmel Agrexco's U.K headquarters in Swallowfield Way, Hayes, Middlesex to highlight the company’s human rights record in occupied Palestine.

Protesters were met with violent assaults by Agrexco security guards who smashed a video camera.

Two protesters are currently under detained by police under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act

A group of demonstrators have locked to the gates (used arm tubes and super glue) to prevent lorries from high street companies such as Sainsbury's and Tesco's from entering the premises to load up on flowers and vegetables grown in occupied palestine. Carmel is the largest importer of fruit, vegetables and flowers from the West Bank, Palestine. It is believed that they are in breach of the International Criminal Court Act 2001.

The protest is part of a week of action against Carmel called for by the Boycott Israeli Goods campaign ( http://www.bigcampaign.org) against the import of Valentines' Day flowers from Israel and Israeli settlements in the occupied territories. The run up to Valentines day is one of the busiest periods of the year for the company. Within the last week there has been a blockade of a Carmel depot in Belgium and local actions occurring around Britain to coincide with the week of action.

Today’s blockade aims to draw attention to this company’s complicity, in murder, theft and damage of occupied land, collective punishment, apartheid and ethnic cleansing, and other breaches of International Law.

Notes For Journalists

Carmel is complicit in war crimes under the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (ICC Act). They import fresh produce originating from illegal Israeli settlements in
the Occupied Territories.

The purpose of the protest is to highlight Agrexco's illegal activity in court.

The action follows a legal warning letter to Carmel stating clearly why they are in breach of the law.

The action took place at Agrexco UK, Swallowfield Way, Hayes, Middlesex, Israel’s largest importer of agricultural produce into the European Union. It is 50% Israeli State owned.

Before taking part in the blockade, many of the protesters had witnessed first hand the suffering of Palestinians under Israeli military occupation.

This follows from actions of 11th November 2004, when Palestine-Solidarity protesters from London and Brighton were arrested after taking part in non-violent blockades outside the same company and 30 August 2006, When demonstrators blockaded the company for 11 hours and no arrests were made.

In September 2005, a Judge ruled that Agrexco (UK) must prove that their business is lawful. The acquittal of the seven activists before they were able to present their
defence meant that the court did not have to rule on the legality of Agrexco-Carmel’s involvement in the supply of produce from illegal settlements in the occupied territories.

In September 2006 protesters blockaded the company again, Carmel refused to have demonstrators arrested because this would have lead to another embarrassing court appearance where theirbusiness methods would have been investigated by a Britishcourt of law.

Links:

Photos of the last blockade
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/08/349440.html

Text of letter sent to Carmel Agrexco

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2006/08/347361.html

Report on Carmel’s Involvement in the Jordan Valley:

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/09/322537.html

Press release from previous trial (with links):

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/331851.html

War on Want’s Report –“Profiting from the Occupation”:

 http://www.waronwant.org/?lid=12671

wallmustfall
- e-mail: thewallmustfall@riseup.net

Comments

Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

correction

11.02.2008 17:48

date should read 2008 not 2007

this is happening now not last year

wmf


Have a wash next time

12.02.2008 09:29

Security guards?!? You're jesting surely. Just normal workers (look up the term) not putting up with intimidation. A pretty poor effort there I'm afraid; it didn't stop a single truck getting past. If you had half a brain you'd be dangerous, but instead you are content to play 'happy - clappy' politics.

Murtock


Well done!

12.02.2008 12:20

I have recently returned from the West Bank and met families who have lost their land to settlements and who now have little option but to send the fathers - and in many cases the children - to work on the settlers' farms on appallingly low ages and without contracts. Much produce sold by Carmel comes from these settlements and it is very important that these actions continue so as to draw attention to the true origins of the company's produce. Well done all and keep up the good work.

Whilst not wantiing to respond to the thoroughly repugnant views of Murtock, I would just like to comment on the issue of intimidation. This was a non-violent protest, however I have heard that many protestors on this action were attacked by 'workers'. Also, were the 'workers' really so intimidated by a woman filming the action that it took three large men to punch her to the ground and smash her camera to bits?

Crane


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

A 'Repugnat' Response

12.02.2008 13:06

No you'll find workers were intimidated by being spat upon, assaulted and verbally abused. In addition non-Agrexco workers (a DHL driver in the wrong place at the wrong time) were prevented from going about their legitimate business and subsequently lost money.

As a 'keyboard warrior' your views are as irrelevant and mis-informed as the rest of your ilk.

In addition why does the rest of the law-abiding citizens in this country have to tax, insure and make sure that their vehicles are in road-worthy condition, but it doesn't seem to apply to the 'rent-a-mob' who choose to disrupt normal people's lives???

Murtock


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Lies and Propaganda

12.02.2008 14:19

The comments of people assualting Women is completley untrue,despite the "men" trying there best to hide behind the women that were there.
Agrexco is a non prophet making organisation so i think you and the rest of your silly little art student friends (who obviously have run out of crayons and ideas) couldn't be further from the truth about these "exploited workers"

And had you stopped the produce from getting in and out you would have caused more harm and hardship to the people that you are so keen to help.
But that isn't really the point is it because it is more of an attention seeking excorcise than any real effort to help anyone.

My advice if anyone really wants to help raise money/clothes/food for one of the many charitable organisations that does GOOD WORTHWHILE work in the areas that are of interest to you.

qualo lego


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

I note...

12.02.2008 14:26

...that you carefully avoid calling Carmel's own business legitimate or lawful. Probably for the best, as previous court cases have highlighted.

If you don't appreciate either action or 'keyboard warriors', what are you doing on this site? Personally I would not say that going to Palestine for yourself in ordert to see the facts on the ground (as "Crane" has) constitutes a keyboard warrior, but there...

Anyway, why am I wasting my time on you...

Well done to everyone involved in all the different Agrexco actions and keep them coming!




Cooper


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Ignorance really is bliss...

12.02.2008 14:45

Dear Crane,

I suggest that you get a job, start paying taxes and contributing to British society in a positive manner. Hiding in trees cultivating fungal spores between your toes and body odour does not count. If you trespass on private property then you are the aggresor and therefore run the risk of being met with retaliation of some variety. As the valid points made by Murtock intimate, these are normal people going about their everyday business and it is your unwanted presence that instigates flash-points.

I run a large and successful hair and beauty chain - please let me invite you personally to one of my many salons where we can dispose of your nasty dreadlocks, unsightly facial hair, and maybe cleans your radical thoughts in the process. You're not beyond hope; there is a decent human being inside you somewhere. You just need to learn to shower in the morning as a matter of course and wash away your extremist views before you set foot in public.

Yours in anticipation,

Vidal Sasson

Vidal Sasson


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Cleaning Products For All!!!

12.02.2008 16:22

As a company trading in the UK/EU for 52 years and validated in Brussels I make no apology for stating Agrexco is a fully legal and valid business. Unlike the validity of your vehicle to be on the road I might add. How you could have lived with yourselves should that deathtrap had killed anyone is beyond me..

The 'keyboard warrior' tag is directed at Mr No Show as he is content to offer the courage of his convictions from behind a computer rather in person. My presence on this site is because I wanted to listen to the 'other' viewpoint, as to why you thought it was reasonable to threaten people in their place of work. A trait not repeated in the ranks of the ignorant and monolithic throng who turned up yesterday intent on confrontation with decent hard-working people earning a living for their families. A trait also not shown in yourself I note...

Typical of your sort; always quick to condemn and far too blinkered to even give the time of day to an alternative viewpoint. Even if it happens to be the correct one...

Murtock


bravo protesters

13.02.2008 01:30


I hope all your bruises heal soon

as for murtock, he obviously seeks to smear your good deeds but in trying to do so exposes himself to ridicule

He finds 'happy clappy people' who are not dangerous, intimidating and deserving violent attack

what kind of person does that make him?

jose


True Courage!

13.02.2008 11:47

Well Done, its courageous activists like yourselves who take part in direct action against oppression that will ultimately help bring about change.

I am worried for the two brave souls who were detained under the terrorism act - any news of them?

I am shocked to hear a lady was attacked by three men and her camera smashed - have the police arrested the culprits?

Murtock - you disgust me.

observer


Police are useless

13.02.2008 18:58

The police did not arrive until the confrontation with the workers had died down. They ignored protesters when told that there was video footage of one protester getting kicked on the ground.

The two held under the terrorism act were quickly released after being searched.

The police again refused to listen when informed of the incident with the camera (which is now in pieces), which had footage of many being assaulted. The police took no action to find out why people were hurt and were not interested in arresting anyone from Carmel.

Murtock, if you want to get beaten up by 20 workers and security, go right ahead.

Beehives


terrorism act

14.02.2008 09:28

The two brave souls detained and searched under s44 terrorism act were released shortly after- just like 99% of the tens of thousands of people who have been imposed upon with the same law since it came into force .

New stop and search powers are coming soon that will allow police to do this under PACE without any reason or form filling afterwards, and thus no evidence that it even happened-and thus no recourse to complain if it was obvious harassment by police.


*


Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments