LSE Union Divided as Students Condemn Israel's Apartheid Regime
Deborah Hyams and James Caspell | 30.01.2008 10:40 | Education | Palestine | Social Struggles | London | World
Over 600 students turned out to debate a motion on Israeli apartheid at the London School of Economics Students' Union (LSESU) Union General Meeting (UGM) last Thursday, 24 January 2008. Students packed the Old Theatre and spilled out into the corridors for the motion, entitled 'Make Apartheid History', which condemned Israel's Apartheid regime and called for the LSESU to lobby the school and the National Union of Students (NUS) to divest from Israeli and international companies that support the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands.
Over 600 students turned out to debate a motion on Israeli apartheid at the London School of Economics Students' Union (LSESU) Union General Meeting (UGM) last Thursday, 24 January 2008. Students packed the Old Theatre and spilled out into the corridors for the motion, entitled 'Make Apartheid History', which condemned Israel's Apartheid regime and called for the LSESU to lobby the school and the National Union of Students (NUS) to divest from Israeli and international companies that support the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands.
The overwhelming attendance for this motion, proposed by the LSESU Palestine Society, shocked everyone including the UGM organisers, and proved that debate and activism are alive and well at LSE. Growing awareness of Israel's systematic discrimination against its Palestinian citizens, colonial settler regime in the West Bank, and brutal siege of the Gaza Strip motivated many LSE students of all backgrounds to take a stand for justice, equality, and human rights.
As LSE student, Ziyaad Lunat, said, "Apartheid in South Africa was defeated when ordinary people around the world, including many LSE students, stopped believing the South African government's propaganda and campaigned for universities to divest from its racist regime. Prominent South Africans including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former President Nelson Mandela, UN Special Rapporteur John Duggard, and Minister of Intelligence Ronnie Kasrils note that Israel has maintained a similar apartheid regime in the Occupied Palestinian Territories for 40 years.”
“It is time for us to call Israeli apartheid by its name and press our universities to divest and stop funding it. Together, students can contribute to making apartheid history once and for all.
Those opposing the motion spread misinformation about its contents (see attachment for the motion's full text) in the period leading up to the vote and at the UGM itself, claiming that the motion labelled individual Jewish or Israeli students 'racists'. In fact, the motion referred only to discriminatory Israeli laws, policies, and government actions (all fully documented), and explicitly called on the LSESU to support Jewish and Israeli organisations that campaign against apartheid and racism in Israel. Although many students from all backgrounds saw through this smear campaign against the motion, the final vote was 285 in favour to 292 against.
Irregularities in the voting procedure, including the presence of non-LSE students at the UGM and the possibility that they may have voted, and the fact that tens of students were turned away from the UGM for lack of space, has cast doubt on the validity of the final vote. This led to the Constitution and Steering Committee ruling the vote invalid yesterday, Tuesday 29th of January 2008 and a revote or resubmission of the motion is likely in the coming weeks.
Contact: Ziyaad Lunat
E-mail:
z.lunat@lse.ac.uk
The overwhelming attendance for this motion, proposed by the LSESU Palestine Society, shocked everyone including the UGM organisers, and proved that debate and activism are alive and well at LSE. Growing awareness of Israel's systematic discrimination against its Palestinian citizens, colonial settler regime in the West Bank, and brutal siege of the Gaza Strip motivated many LSE students of all backgrounds to take a stand for justice, equality, and human rights.
As LSE student, Ziyaad Lunat, said, "Apartheid in South Africa was defeated when ordinary people around the world, including many LSE students, stopped believing the South African government's propaganda and campaigned for universities to divest from its racist regime. Prominent South Africans including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former President Nelson Mandela, UN Special Rapporteur John Duggard, and Minister of Intelligence Ronnie Kasrils note that Israel has maintained a similar apartheid regime in the Occupied Palestinian Territories for 40 years.”
“It is time for us to call Israeli apartheid by its name and press our universities to divest and stop funding it. Together, students can contribute to making apartheid history once and for all.
Those opposing the motion spread misinformation about its contents (see attachment for the motion's full text) in the period leading up to the vote and at the UGM itself, claiming that the motion labelled individual Jewish or Israeli students 'racists'. In fact, the motion referred only to discriminatory Israeli laws, policies, and government actions (all fully documented), and explicitly called on the LSESU to support Jewish and Israeli organisations that campaign against apartheid and racism in Israel. Although many students from all backgrounds saw through this smear campaign against the motion, the final vote was 285 in favour to 292 against.
Irregularities in the voting procedure, including the presence of non-LSE students at the UGM and the possibility that they may have voted, and the fact that tens of students were turned away from the UGM for lack of space, has cast doubt on the validity of the final vote. This led to the Constitution and Steering Committee ruling the vote invalid yesterday, Tuesday 29th of January 2008 and a revote or resubmission of the motion is likely in the coming weeks.
Contact: Ziyaad Lunat
E-mail:
z.lunat@lse.ac.uk
Deborah Hyams and James Caspell
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
Problem (democracy in voluntary organizations)
31.01.2008 12:33
Understand what I am saying? The question you may be facing is whether the LSE student union would survive the withdrawal of all the "zionists" and their support should they lose the vote. It is entirely possible that at least some of the non-zionist votes are based upon the reality of this situation. Democracy in a STATE is different, as the losing side in an election is forced to accept the outcome (unless it fancies it would win a civil war and the issue that critical). But voluntary associations lack the necessary clout, are unable to enforce the decision upon the losing side. Any attempt to do so immediately raises ANOTHER major issue again a matter of life or death for the organization (ability to enforce a decision implies an INvoluntary association -- the question now is whether the association is voluntary or not, completely unrelated to the previous issue which caused the split in the first place).
Mike Novack
e-mail:
stepbystpaefarm mtdata.com
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments