Skip to content or view screen version

Kathleen and Bill Christison Talk Genocide in Palestine

Audiophile | 18.01.2008 09:56 | Palestine | World

As Bush returns from his 'Peace' mission to the Middle East, Bill and Kathleen Christison, former CIA analysts speak out against the ongoing genocide in Palestine.

Broadcast on Flashpoints ( http://flashpoints.net/) on 17th January 2008.

30 Minute interview.

Audiophile

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

"Genocide" my arse

19.01.2008 09:53

West Bank & Gaza Strip: Arab Population (1948-2005)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year West Bank Gaza Strip

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1948 462,100 82,500

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1950* 765,000 240,000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1960 799,000 302,000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1970** 677,000 368,000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1980 964,000 497,000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1985 1,044,000 532,288

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 1,254,506 642,814

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 1,626,689 875,231

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 2,020,298 1,132,063

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 2,385,615 1,376,289

Reality Check


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

indymedia UK loves holocaust denier 'Reality Check'

19.01.2008 15:10

In a week when Israel has carried out the most depraved crimes against the people of Gaza, note how indymedia UK is near scrubbed clean of any reference to these crimes against humanity. Racist psychopaths who hold COMMON PURPOSE with the genocidal acts of the Israelis, like 'Reality Check', are allowed to successfully determine the permitted content here.

 http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m40232&hd=&size=1&l=e

Anyone who visits Indymedia UK should be ashamed of themselves if they are not regular visitors to sites like uruknet, where they will find stories covering events that projects like the Israeli 'megaphone project' are designed to scrub from all mainstream so-called liberal outlets. Constant attacks on the almost non-existant coverage of Israeli crimes against humanity on Indymedia UK are designed to allow zionist moderators to pressure the anarchists, liberals, socialists and others to further reduce the coverage to near zero, and at the same time ensure such remaining coverage is bland and impact free.

When 'Reality Check's comrades blew to pieces the wedding party yesterday, 'Reality Check' was fully aware that it and other supporters of Israel's race hate crimes had long since succeeded in making Indymedia a no-go area for any major coverage of such events, and it was correct. In the British mainstream press, published by, and written by people like 'Reality Check', the elected government of Gaza are described as sub-human scum, to be butchered in any horrific way Israel wishes. The mainstream coverage universally uses the same race-hate phrases and memes, including that the politicians elected by massive majority took power 'by force', and that any soldier attempting to protect the civilians of Gaza is a 'gunman' or 'militant'.

Those that take an active part in Indymedia UK, and have allowed the zionists amongst them to take full control of the content of this site should be ashamed of themselves. Yes, the zionists never ever stop with their propaganda, or psychological control methods, attempting to intimidate or wear down even the most determined person. However, zionist tactics have been well established for decades now, and should be fully expected. UK zionists are currently at their zenith, with the fact that Gordon Brown is a full blown zionist, having been raised as a child to worship Israel as the most important nation on Earth by his insane racist father (yes, same strand as all those extremist racist ultra right wing zionist christians in the USA, like Cheney and Bush).

Today, 'Reality Check' and others like him bask in the fact that Brown and his appointed ministers explicitly state that giving the public accurate details of Israeli crimes against muslims and christians within the occupied territories is akin to supporting terrorism. The aim of those that harass the ever declining coverage of the middle-east here on Indymedia UK is to force this site to replicate the same language used by racist news-outlets like the BBC or the various british newspapers. If Indymedia UK is to have any coverage at all, it must sound like an Israeli army press release.

Those that still use the newswire have 'learned their lesson', making their reports on Israel as bland and inoffensive as possible, to give the zionist moderators as little excuse as possible to hide them. Where this happens, the co-conspirators of these moderators merely swap to attacking the story in the comments. This allows the moderators to carefully argue to the non-zionist moderators that even the bland coverage of Israel should be under constant scrutiny.

Those of you that still use Indymedia UK in any kind of honest political sense should look at recent events with horror, seeing how easily the actions of a few dedicated racists, constantly attacking a service, can completely control its output. Brown and Bush have given Israel explicit permission to carry out the most vile atrocities against the people of Gaza, until the legally elected government of Gaza has been completely exterminated, and US stooge Abbas can install a zionist approved military dictatorship there, in the same pattern as Musharraf of Pakistan. The western mass media has been instructed to reduce coverage of victims of Israeli crimes against humanity to near zero, while painting the Israelis as victims (much like saying the 1984 boot was the 'victim' of the face it endlessly smashed into).

Many of you turn to sites like this as an alternative to the mainstream media. However, any of you that think Indymedia UK is achieving an aim of being an alternate outlet for news need your heads looking at. A tiny number of dedicated racists control whole agendas here, with many many topics ruled off limits. Many regular newswire contributors were driven away when they attempted to post articles that ran against the interests of Israel or those that run the UK Labour party.

Those that do the censorship do not expect such people to give up. Their intent is much more disgusting. Instead, they expect 'ghetto' sites to appear, where such honest news stories can be reported without censorship. These 'ghetto' sites can then be labelled by the mainstream media as 'terrorist' or 'extremist', and used in the propaganda war to justify the creation of ever more restrictive laws on the freedom of expression, or the ability of ordinary people to challenge state controlled journalists.

To conclude, let each of you ask why Indymedia UK carried almost nothing about the ongoing Israeli atrocities in Gaza, carried out with the full support and incitement of Gordon Brown, and the 'friends of Israel' movements that control the Labour, Conservative and 'Liberal' parties within the UK. Ask yourselves how a tiny number of dedicated racists have created this current situation at Indymedia UK. Consider the control such racists have gained over the site, and what may be done to reverse this in the future.

ac


The legal definition of genocide

20.01.2008 03:07

The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and

2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide."

Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity.
Excerpt from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide (For full text click here)

"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. "

Discussion:

It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide.

Punishable Acts The following are genocidal acts when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence:

Killing members of the group includes direct killing and actions causing death.

Causing serious bodily or mental harm includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation.

Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group’s physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts.

Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation.

Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 18 years.

Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group’s existence.

Protected Groups:

The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.

A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.

An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.

A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.

A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.

Usually people are born into these four groups. These four groups share the common characteristic that individuals are most often born into the group. While some individuals may change nationality or religion - or even adopt a new cultural, ethnic or racial identity - usually people do not choose their group identity. In genocide people are targeted for destruction not because anything they have done, but because of who they are.

Group idenity is often imposed by the perpetrators. Perpetrators of genocide frequently make group categories more rigid or create new definintions which impose group identity on individuals, eithout regard to peoples individual choices.

Key Terms:

The crime of genocide has two elements: intent and action. “Intentional” means purposeful. Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders. But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts.

Intent is different from motive. Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorrial integrity, etc.), if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide.

The phrase "in whole or in part" is important. Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group. Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide. Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members – mass murder. But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.

Other Information:

Kofi Annan's Stockholm Genocide Prevention Proposals, January 26, 2004 In Stockholm, Sweden on January 26, 2004 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan calls for parties to the Genocide Convention to establish a Genocide Prevention Committee and a UN Special Rapporteur on Genocide Prevention.

Ratification Status: 135 Nations are parties to the Genocide Convention, but 52 Nations are NOT, including Indonesia, Japan and Nigeria.

Article II was included without change in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as Article 6 and also in the the Statutes of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and former Yugoslavia. For a more detailed description of the crimes described in Article II (Rome Statute Article 6) see the Elements of the Crime of Genocide agreed upon by the International Criminal Court Preparatory Commission in June 2000.

Over 80 nations have made provisions for the punishment of genocide in domestic criminal law, sometimes modifying the legal definition. Prosecution of genocide in domestic courts is becoming more frequent.

The legal definition of genocide can be compared to five alternative definitions of genocide proposed by researchers and scholars Frank Chalk & Kurt Jonassohn, Israel Charny, Helen Fein, Barbara Harff & Ted Gurr and Steven Katz.

preventgenocideinternational
- Homepage: http://www.preventgenocide.org/genocide/officialtext-printerfriendly.htm


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments