Attention: Ms. Smith Home Snake Secretary
Mrs. Charity Sweet | 17.01.2008 15:41 | SOCPA | Indymedia | Repression | Social Struggles | London
17 Jan 2008
ProtestaroundParliament@homeoffice.gsi - is peaceful political dissent an act of Terrorism?
Category: MySpace
Something I found that I had written March 27, 2007
Description: Is public peaceful political dissent an act of Terrorism?
I am an artist and i paint and sculpt and I draw... yada yada yada...
I didn't go to court with my mates yesterday and was told I was listed
for a terrorist charge under SOCPA. Steve Jago recieved a copy of the
summons that was sent to my old, old address for a charge on October
30, 2006. Not very swift in their summonses.
My crime?
Unless
I am mistaken, I was standing at 10 Downing Street with a painted old
English wooden door... a door painted with a St. Gerorge's flag and
free speech graffitied over it and a few other bits. Faith, Hope and
Charity...
What am I like?
What are they like?
First I was cautioned as a terrorist under SOCPA for singing to my seven year old daughter Maranda...
Next, I was stopped and searched for reading the Independent newspaper under the Terrorism Act.
Honest to god...
Inspector Heart threatens to arrest me and my child and place me in cells and her
with social services... for exercising my right to free speech, the
right to express your opinions, contravening my human rights (Article
3,9,10,11,19).
Goon police officers behaving lake Nazis think that they can assalt my friends, in front of my children, in broad daylight, in full view of the public.(?)
If you are not doing anything on Thursday at 2:00 pm, I cordially invite you to Horseshit Road, otherwise known as Westminsters Magistrates Court to witness DJ
Evans...
do a little dance, bend a bit of law...
get down the court!
hey! get down the court!
Barbara Tucker was also listed for four new SOCPA charges that she also had not
recieved summons for and as she was simply there as a MacKenzie friend
for Steve Jago as it appears he is being denied legal aid for his SOCPA
cases (?), she was not offered legal represenation, given ant advanced
disclosure too, and was demanded a plea be given, so much so, the
judge, as in Brian's previous case of illegal seizure, May 23, 2006,
decided to make the plea for her. Do what?
Barbara clearly stated in the courtroom, in a horse quiet voice, to DJ Evans and the
court, that she believed he was dishonest and the next thing you know,
she is hauled off by CIRCO for contempt of court with Mr. Brian W. Haw
being dragged off to the cells, soon after, for the same charge of contempt - for telling the truth?
So, Brian and Barbara and me and Steve will all be heading down to Horseferry Road on Thursday. Brain and babs to answer for contempt and me to answer for terrorism.
I believe it is high time for a bit of English law and civil justice.
Tony Blair is a war criminal and genocide is a war crime.
We, the people, demand an arrest warrant be immediately issued by Her
Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II for Tony Blair's past and present on-going
crimes.
Killing foreign children for domestic financial gain is as sick as war gets.
BAE Bombs do not have a built in 'avoid children' mechanism.
XXX
N.B. Orla Austin may not have kept conteperaneous notes very well and I did. The court clerk of COWMC has cleraly perjured herself. Lying slag.
Please respond by emailing Jackie Smith Home Snake today:
ProtestaroundParliament@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
if you have any doubts... watch this video
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389531.wmv
a bit of my letter to ms. smith the home snake
17 January 2008
Government Consulation on SOCPA 2005
Attention:
The Home Secretary of England - Ms. Smith
Managing Protest around Parliament
Public Order Unit
Home Office
5th Floor Fry Building
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
Dear Ms. Smith,
I hardly know where to begin.
Please find enclosed a copy of the Bill to repeal SOCPA 2005 by Baroness Miller of Chilthorn Domer; secondly, a copy of the Website repeal-SOCPA.info site - a mainstream, reasonable, intellectual written observation of the issue at hand to which I agree completely; lastly, a letter from myself to Chief Inspector Wheeler to which neither myself nor my daughter have yet received a response to regarding her notification and her outstanding notice of authorisation to which the Commissioner of the Metropolis of London is lawfully bound by SOCPA 2005, to give within 6 days.
As the Commissioner is the only officer who may impose conditions and has not as yet offered any proof to myself that he has delegated his authority as I would reasonably request of him should he delegate his authority, I am assuming that Sir Ian Blair is personally responsible for the neglect to authorise my 8 year old child to her rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly to which I believe, as a mother, you have absolutely no lawful right to interfere with.
I understand the Human Rights Act was brought into English domestic law in 1998 which binds the Crown and employees of the Crown and that any interference with any of these rights must have a clear legitimate aim and be prescribed in law. There are no prescribed processes within SOCPA 2005 and the only clear aim I can see of this ludicrous legislation is not legitimate and deeply unlawful as it is, in reality, been placed by the Parliament and penned by Tony Blair under the past Home Secretary, as a gag order on political dissent; firstly, upon freedom of speech and presently, freedom of assembly is being placed under 'attack' by the present Home Secretary.
I reasonably want to know exactly who I am dealing with and understand exactly under which lawful authority that party is acting. I do not believe that to be an unreasonable request.
It is my understanding that this legislation was quoted in Parliament as "a hammer to crack a nut" in reference to Mr. Brian W. Haw whose father was one of the first soldiers to enter the horrors of the Berger-Belson concentration camp and rescue the victims of the Nazi Regime; an honourable deed one must concede.
Mr. Haw has been to Cambodia and born witness to 'the killing fields' from another war of another generation, yet another human tragedy of which most of humanity is capable of understanding should they dare to understand the reality of cause and effect., the natural laws of physics.
If you any doubt in your mind whatsoever with regard to the unfettered powers that have been disgracefully put upon certain objectionable members of the Metropolitan Police Force, I insist that you spend 5 minutes of your prescious time within your consultation to view this video of events from last Saturday's peaceful protest against the gag order on free speech and banning order upon freedom of assembly you are attempting to hang like a black cloud over this great nation of free thinkers.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389502.wmv
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389531.wmv.
ProtestaroundParliament@homeoffice.gsi - is peaceful political dissent an act of Terrorism?
Category: MySpace
Something I found that I had written March 27, 2007
Description: Is public peaceful political dissent an act of Terrorism?
I am an artist and i paint and sculpt and I draw... yada yada yada...
I didn't go to court with my mates yesterday and was told I was listed
for a terrorist charge under SOCPA. Steve Jago recieved a copy of the
summons that was sent to my old, old address for a charge on October
30, 2006. Not very swift in their summonses.
My crime?
Unless
I am mistaken, I was standing at 10 Downing Street with a painted old
English wooden door... a door painted with a St. Gerorge's flag and
free speech graffitied over it and a few other bits. Faith, Hope and
Charity...
What am I like?
What are they like?
First I was cautioned as a terrorist under SOCPA for singing to my seven year old daughter Maranda...
Next, I was stopped and searched for reading the Independent newspaper under the Terrorism Act.
Honest to god...
Inspector Heart threatens to arrest me and my child and place me in cells and her
with social services... for exercising my right to free speech, the
right to express your opinions, contravening my human rights (Article
3,9,10,11,19).
Goon police officers behaving lake Nazis think that they can assalt my friends, in front of my children, in broad daylight, in full view of the public.(?)
If you are not doing anything on Thursday at 2:00 pm, I cordially invite you to Horseshit Road, otherwise known as Westminsters Magistrates Court to witness DJ
Evans...
do a little dance, bend a bit of law...
get down the court!
hey! get down the court!
Barbara Tucker was also listed for four new SOCPA charges that she also had not
recieved summons for and as she was simply there as a MacKenzie friend
for Steve Jago as it appears he is being denied legal aid for his SOCPA
cases (?), she was not offered legal represenation, given ant advanced
disclosure too, and was demanded a plea be given, so much so, the
judge, as in Brian's previous case of illegal seizure, May 23, 2006,
decided to make the plea for her. Do what?
Barbara clearly stated in the courtroom, in a horse quiet voice, to DJ Evans and the
court, that she believed he was dishonest and the next thing you know,
she is hauled off by CIRCO for contempt of court with Mr. Brian W. Haw
being dragged off to the cells, soon after, for the same charge of contempt - for telling the truth?
So, Brian and Barbara and me and Steve will all be heading down to Horseferry Road on Thursday. Brain and babs to answer for contempt and me to answer for terrorism.
I believe it is high time for a bit of English law and civil justice.
Tony Blair is a war criminal and genocide is a war crime.
We, the people, demand an arrest warrant be immediately issued by Her
Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II for Tony Blair's past and present on-going
crimes.
Killing foreign children for domestic financial gain is as sick as war gets.
BAE Bombs do not have a built in 'avoid children' mechanism.
XXX
N.B. Orla Austin may not have kept conteperaneous notes very well and I did. The court clerk of COWMC has cleraly perjured herself. Lying slag.
Please respond by emailing Jackie Smith Home Snake today:
ProtestaroundParliament@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
if you have any doubts... watch this video
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389531.wmv
a bit of my letter to ms. smith the home snake
17 January 2008
Government Consulation on SOCPA 2005
Attention:
The Home Secretary of England - Ms. Smith
Managing Protest around Parliament
Public Order Unit
Home Office
5th Floor Fry Building
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
Dear Ms. Smith,
I hardly know where to begin.
Please find enclosed a copy of the Bill to repeal SOCPA 2005 by Baroness Miller of Chilthorn Domer; secondly, a copy of the Website repeal-SOCPA.info site - a mainstream, reasonable, intellectual written observation of the issue at hand to which I agree completely; lastly, a letter from myself to Chief Inspector Wheeler to which neither myself nor my daughter have yet received a response to regarding her notification and her outstanding notice of authorisation to which the Commissioner of the Metropolis of London is lawfully bound by SOCPA 2005, to give within 6 days.
As the Commissioner is the only officer who may impose conditions and has not as yet offered any proof to myself that he has delegated his authority as I would reasonably request of him should he delegate his authority, I am assuming that Sir Ian Blair is personally responsible for the neglect to authorise my 8 year old child to her rights of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly to which I believe, as a mother, you have absolutely no lawful right to interfere with.
I understand the Human Rights Act was brought into English domestic law in 1998 which binds the Crown and employees of the Crown and that any interference with any of these rights must have a clear legitimate aim and be prescribed in law. There are no prescribed processes within SOCPA 2005 and the only clear aim I can see of this ludicrous legislation is not legitimate and deeply unlawful as it is, in reality, been placed by the Parliament and penned by Tony Blair under the past Home Secretary, as a gag order on political dissent; firstly, upon freedom of speech and presently, freedom of assembly is being placed under 'attack' by the present Home Secretary.
I reasonably want to know exactly who I am dealing with and understand exactly under which lawful authority that party is acting. I do not believe that to be an unreasonable request.
It is my understanding that this legislation was quoted in Parliament as "a hammer to crack a nut" in reference to Mr. Brian W. Haw whose father was one of the first soldiers to enter the horrors of the Berger-Belson concentration camp and rescue the victims of the Nazi Regime; an honourable deed one must concede.
Mr. Haw has been to Cambodia and born witness to 'the killing fields' from another war of another generation, yet another human tragedy of which most of humanity is capable of understanding should they dare to understand the reality of cause and effect., the natural laws of physics.
If you any doubt in your mind whatsoever with regard to the unfettered powers that have been disgracefully put upon certain objectionable members of the Metropolitan Police Force, I insist that you spend 5 minutes of your prescious time within your consultation to view this video of events from last Saturday's peaceful protest against the gag order on free speech and banning order upon freedom of assembly you are attempting to hang like a black cloud over this great nation of free thinkers.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389502.wmv
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/media/2008/01//389531.wmv.
Mrs. Charity Sweet
e-mail:
charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk
Comments
Hide the following comment
an addition
17.01.2008 16:18
Children 4 Peace - to authorise or to not authorise... that is the question.
Category: News and Politics
03 November 2007
SOCPA Authorisation
Chief Inspector Ian Wheeler
CX - Charing Cross Police Station
Agar Street
London
WC2N 4DH
Chief Inspector Ian Wheeler:
Thank you for your letter dated October 30th and post marked October 31. I note my daughter Miss Maranda Cameron's notification form was completed and hand delivered on October 18th, 2007 at the same time, on the same day, to Charing Cross Station, as myself and my friend, Carolyn Emmerson. I am informed that Carolyn received her letter of authorisation some time last week and I recieved mine in today's post, dated October 24th, 2007 and post marked November 2nd, 2007.
I assume you or Detective Superintendent Peter Newman will also be writing a letter to my daughter, at either of your earliest convenience, as she is most excited to be receiving mail through the post and has been expecting a letter such as the one I received from yourself today. Her SOCPA experience will prove to be a most interesting lesson in civics and the role of an up-and-coming citizen of England, participating in a democracy, as she experiences it – from the perspective of an eight year old child.
Maranda has handed in a completed form as per the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act legislation states the required information to be given and the Metropolitan Police Force suggests; we are both waiting for an answer.
I understand from Metropolitan Police Form 3175A and SOCPA that the Commissioner may impose conditions on her rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. As I have received this letter from yourself, I am compelled to issue a response on behalf of my daughter, as her mother and the person who truly has her best welfare at heart.
I understand the SOCPA legislation states that conditions may be imposed if the Commissioner perceives or believes or assumes that the following must be prevented:
a) Hindrance to any person wishing to enter or leave the Palace of Westminster. Sir, I can assure you as can the Head of the Metropolitan Parliamentary Police Force, that I have never, in the past two years of being watching from various angles, from various CCTV cameras and dealt with by numerous police officers, ever obstructed the Queen's Highway nor moved with the public, out of the way of any incoming or outgoing vehicles of Parliament nor as a responsible parent would I place my daughter in such a ridiculous situation. It would be foolish to play hopscotch in the middle of any road or entranceway where one is expected to be moved on. I also have absolutely no desire to be mowed down by any manner of vehicle as I am a mother of three beautiful children and neither would I knowingly place my child in the way of an oncoming vehicle.
b) Hindrance to the proper operation of Parliament. I cannot see how children playing nicely could halt the proper operation of Parliament. Parliament could learn a thing or two from the children, I would dare to say.
c) Serious Public Disorder. Are children playing nicely or learning creating serious public disorder?
d) Serious damage to property. I can assure you that children playing nicely will do nothing but inspire the smiles on the face of London and will cause no destruction of property.
e) Disruption to life on the community. I believe that art only adds to the life of the community which is why children are generally encouraged to play with each other nicely – a lesson Maranda believes the adults could do with learning.
f) A security risk in any part of the designated area. Are children ever a security risk in any shape or form? Is being a child now a potential crime?
g) Risk to safety to members of the public. Once again? Is it risky for the public to be exposed to children in the community, in public? Is it not pleasant to stroll through an area where children are busy painting, or drawing or skipping and playing?
I have read the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act and do not accept that the Act allows for ageism - discrimination based upon age.
My daughter's form was filled out with the help of Mr. Chris Coverdale and she gave great thought to the answers she gave. Her questions were answered in the same fashion as myself and Carolyn Emmerson. I see no reason why myself and my child should have to attend a meeting so as she may be interrogated by yourself so as you may "ascertain your (and Maranda's) intentions and understanding of this application".
I kindly decline your offer of a meeting and would appreciate yourself or another officer from the 'events' division of Charing Cross Police Station to post a letter of authorisation to my daughter, at your earliest convenience, with or without conditions as the Commissioner may see fit to impose on a child and/or children.
I look forward to hearing your response at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
Mrs. Charity Sweet
CS XXX
e-mail: charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk