Skip to content or view screen version

Disabled man from Kenya suing Home Office supports Harmondsworth detainees on tr

Winvisible & Payday | 12.01.2008 07:15 | Migration | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements

Peter Gichura, a wheelchair user from Kenya, detained twice in Harmondsworth detention centre, and still under threat of deportation, will take part in the demonstration outside Southwark Crown Court in support of the Harmondsworth 4.

Peter Gichura
Peter Gichura


Four men have been targeted for prosecution following protests in Harmondsworth on 28 November 2006, the day after publication of a damning report by Chief Inspector of Prisons Anne Owers into conditions and treatment of detainees at Harmondsworth. The investigation found 44% of detainees had reported being victimised by staff, and 60% said they felt unsafe there.

Protests were triggered by guards preventing detainees watching a news broadcast about the report. Prison riot squads were drafted in to batter the protesters into submission. About 50 detainees were left in a courtyard all night. Some were forced to go without food and water for over 40 hours. Others were locked in dangerously overcrowded rooms while parts of the detention centre were on fire.

The horrendous conditions in Harmondsworth are replicated in removal centres across the country, where women and men courageously organise against daily brutality, including sexist/racist attacks, and other violence from guards and escorts, both inside centres and during removal attempts. Pregnant women, mothers and children and victims of rape and other torture, with disabilities and suffering serious ill-health, are often detained for months or face fast-track deportations under increasingly harsh legislation.

Peter Gichura, detained in February and August 2006, is bringing a precedent-setting disability discrimination case, and said:

“I’ve experienced the violence and racism inside Harmondsworth first-hand and that is why I’m supporting the Harmondsworth 4.

“In Harmondsworth they put me in a room where I was not able to use the bathroom and toilet properly; I suffered painful, threatening and humiliating body searches and inadequate medical treatment. I am suing the Home Office and Kalyx, the private company running Harmondsworth.

“I injured my spine from a fall while fleeing police in Kenya. The Home Office refused my asylum claims -- from persecution as a Kikuyu disability activist living in the slum of Kibera in Nairobi, and for life-saving medical treatment and living conditions here. Given the extreme violence in Kenya now, how can it be safe for me and others to be returned?

“Why should we, whose only ‘crime’ is seeking asylum, be locked up and abused?”


The Harmondsworth 4 campaign is supported by: London No Borders, Barbed-Wire Britain, Institute for Race Relations, Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism, Women of Colour in the Global Women’s Strike, All African Women’s Group, the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns, and other organisations.

For more on the Harmondsworth 4 Campaign:
 http://www.noborders.org.uk or email  harmondsworth4@riseup.net

For more on Peter Gichura see: www.refusingtokill.net/Peter%20Gichura/PeterGichuraindex.htm
Support Mercy Murua and Peter Gichura
 http://www.ncadc.org.uk/archives/filed%20newszines/oldnewszines/newszine76/mercypeter.html
Peter Gitau Gichura back in the wars
 http://www.ncadc.org.uk/archives/filed%20newszines/oldnewszines/Newszine73/peter.html

WinVisible, women with visible & invisible disabilities
Tel 020 7482 2496 (voice/minicom)  winvisible@allwomencount.net
Payday, a network of men working with the Global Women’s Strike
Tel 020 7209 4751 mobile 07803 789699
 payday@paydaynet.org www.refusingtokill.net

This is a: Winvisible & Payday Press Release
For more information contact:
Claire Glasman 020 7482 2496
Giorgio Riva 020 7209 4751 mobile 07803 789699
Peter Gichura will be available for interviews from 10.30am at Southwark Crown Court

Winvisible & Payday
- e-mail: payday@paydaynet.org
- Homepage: http://www.refusingtokill.net

Comments

Hide the following comment

...a few inaccuracies (accidental, I'm sure):

16.01.2008 13:43

As was widely reported at the time, the detention centre was built from fire-resistant materials, the only things burnt were books and furnishings that inmates set fire to in order to trigger the alarms and fire doors. Sprinklers put out all of these tiny fires in seconds.

There were around 250 TV's in the centre on the night of the riot - the vast majority of them in bedrooms. Was there an officer standing in front of each one that evening, to censor a TV report that had been showing all day long? I think not - that story is a total fabrication.

No inmates were 'battered' during the riot - indeed the only serious injury was to a man who had cut his hand whilst looting the centre's shop.

The HMCIP statistics were so woefully skewed by their small sampling and non-representative make-up (many of those questioned had been in Secure or Segregated accommodation due to their criminal/violent/disruptive behaviour - hardly the best background for a trustworthy and impartial source) as to be nonsense - and are much misquoted anyway.

I'm curious as to why the gentleman in the above story believes that his unfortunate situation uniquely qualifies him to remain in this country and receive the free medical treatment paid for by the British taxpayer - and not the other millions of equally badly-off people in his home continent.

Were all those less fortunate than us to come to Britain, how long would it take for our public services to collapse - rendering the whole exercise futile?

An interested party