Skip to content or view screen version

Ken Livingstone's morality-free parade of 'Muslim leaders' stinks of desperation

AADHIKARonline London in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail | 03.01.2008 22:40 | Anti-racism | Social Struggles | London | World

Two items of pro Ken Livingstone propaganda as published today carry the evidence of Ken Livingstone's desperation. This is bad news fur any democratic say by the people of and in London


By©Muhammad Haque
2240 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday 3 January 2008


Two items of pro Ken Livingstone propaganda as published today carry the evidence of Ken Livingstone's desperation. As observers of the manifestly disintegrating Ken Livingstone image will have noticed, the Guardian ahs been playing a less than helpful role in the destruction of Ken Livingstone’s career. It was the Guardian that brought us the farcical claim that Doreen Lawrence had become a spokesperson for London’s black people n the matter of the preservation of Ken Livingstone’s career at the expense of the democratic right of the people of London to exercise an effective say n the future 'governance' of London as it relates to the role and the duties of whosever seeks any London wide public office including the office of mayor for the capital city as Tony Blair ill-advisedly and divertingly created this highly wasteful and scandalizing opportunity!

The item as first published first by the Guardian Unbelievable website abut 22 hours ago with the additionally ‘Muslim sounding’ by-line

“Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent
Thursday January 3, 200”


 http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,2234452,00.html

The BBC too published the item on their website. As they dated it as at 1138 GMT. January 2008

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7169303.stm



Neither version of the Ken Livingstone propaganda item contains any evidence as to who Livingstone’s supposed ‘Muslim leaders’ were, or, more importantly, what the basis was for their alleged claim, by the Guardian and the BBC that these alleged Muslim leaders were representing any universally applicable and ethically pure and evidentially founded democratic or similar moral position of an informed community where the Muslim presence was contextually significant.

AADHIKARonline London in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail
- e-mail: aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

An edited text

03.01.2008 22:55

By©Muhammad Haque
2255 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday 3 January 2008


Two items of pro Ken Livingstone propaganda as published today carry the evidence of Ken Livingstone's desperation. As observers of the manifestly disintegrating Ken Livingstone image will have noticed, the Guardian has been playing a less than helpful role in the destruction of Ken Livingstone’s career. It was the Guardian that brought us the farcical claim that Doreen Lawrence had become a spokesperson for London’s black people n the matter of the preservation of Ken Livingstone’s career at the expense of the democratic right of the people of London to exercise an effective say n the future 'governance' of London as it relates to the role and the duties of whosever seeks any London awide public office including the office of mayor for the capital city as Tony Blair ill-advisedly and divertingly created this highly wasteful and scandalizing opportunity!

The item as [space] published first by the Guardian Unbelievable website about 22 hours ago with the additionally ‘Muslim sounding’ by-line

“Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent
Thursday January 3, 200”


 http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,2234452,00.html

The BBC too published the item on their website. As they dated it as at 1138 GMT. January 2008

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7169303.stm



Neither version of the Ken Livingstone propaganda item contains any evidence as to who Livingstone’s supposed ‘Muslim leaders’ were, or, more importantly, what the basis was for their alleged claim, by the Guardian and the BBC that these alleged Muslim leaders were representing any universally applicable and ethically pure and evidentially founded democratic or similar moral position of an informed community where the Muslim presence was contextually significant.

AADHIKARonline London in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail


Ken Livingstone's morality-free parade of 'Muslim leaders' stinks of [versn 2]

03.01.2008 23:40

Ken Livingstone's morality-free parade of 'Muslim leaders' stinks of desperation
AADHIKARonline London in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail


Two items of pro Ken Livingstone propaganda as published today [Thursday 3 January 2008] carry the evidence of Ken Livingstone's desperation. This is bad news for any democratic say by the people of and in London






By©Muhammad Haque
Version edited at 2340 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday 3 January 2008


Two items of pro Ken Livingstone propaganda as published today carry the evidence of Ken Livingstone's desperation. As observers of the manifestly disintegrating Ken Livingstone image will have noticed, the Guardian has been playing a less than helpful role in the destruction of Ken Livingstone’s career.

It was the Guardian that had brought us the farcical claim earlier in 2007 that Doreen Lawrence [mother of Stephen Lawrence] had become a spokesperson for London’s black people n the matter of the preservation of Ken Livingstone’s career and of Ken Livingstone to pursue his career even at the expense of the democratic right of the people of London to exercise an effective say en the future 'governance' of London as it relates to the role and the duties of whosever seeks any London wide public office including the office of mayor for the capital city as Tony Blair ill-advisedly and divertingly created this highly wasteful and scandalizing opportunity!

The item as published first by the Guardian Unbelievable website abut 22 hours ago with the additionally ‘Muslim sounding’ by-line read as follows: -

“Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent
Thursday January 3, 200”


 http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,2234452,00.html

The BBC too published the item on their website. As they dated it as at 1138 GMT. January 2008

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7169303.stm



Neither version of the Ken Livingstone propaganda item contains any evidence as to who Livingstone’s supposed ‘Muslim leaders’ were, or, more importantly, what the basis was for their alleged claim, by the Guardian and the BBC that these alleged Muslim leaders were representing any universally applicable and ethically pure and evidentially founded democratic or similar moral position of an informed community where the Muslim presence was contextually significant.

AADHIKARonline London in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail
mail e-mail: aadhikarlaw@yahoo.co.uk


Wonder what the Forest Gate Two will make of this

04.01.2008 01:54

and Ken Livingstone's unwavering support for Sir Ian Blair, the de Menezes operation and rearguard action against the Brian Haw protest?

GW


PLEASE learn to use fullstops.

06.01.2008 19:42

First award for non usage of fullstops in a huge arse sentence goes to you.

Amir Taaki