The problems of faked, misunderstood or scammed results from tortuous "twilight zone" type interrogations of gitmo, etc, are shown by the odd tales people put their name to - ie meetings with people in faraway places when the people actually watching them for the UK had proof they were here all the time. . . .
The problem of "blowback" from this sort of thing, or Abu Ghraib, is something UK top brass, amongst others, have referred to, in the same breath as explaining how the perpetuation of what is seen as foreign occupation creates more terrorists - the short term solution of seeming to favour or support one "tribe" or group against others seems to show short termresults, but is often a "better" way to ensure a nastier internal war afterwards . . . .
The blowback from what is seen at the time as straightforward or glamorous is seen by the debates that occur around a big motion picture coming out on British screens from the 11/1/8 from the director of Catch 22, amongst others. A few extra questions, a few extra bits of information should sort it.
Cover ups tend to glare a bit. The fact that in the USA, 56 of 88 Ohio "Boards of election" from 2004 have tried to destroy the federally protected proof is. . . . interesting. Understatement. See the Columbia Freepress front page this week!
Dave Kellys posthumous wiping his knife clean of fingerprints. . . . hmmmm.
As the "DI'n'DODI" inquest had almost got people to look the other way out of frequent mention of details that seemed of interest to royal gossips only, Lobster magazines last copy notices that the "Paget" inquiry seemed to dismiss a threatening phonecall to her - with a witness - after she got involved in the campaign against mines - after it wasnt the person who she was lead to think it was. But it happened. But they didnt follow it up. Why?
Seeing as the other information that came out about her - ie that she had taken a serious approach to comprehending islam, for the sake of a loving respect for a good doctor, then, it seems, the happy appreciation of a different guy, mirrors the title of the book Bhutto had written ( re Christianity/Islam) - thus, perhaps - what a few people saw as the "bridging" role either might have played in different ways, with that challenge of her popularity drying up dodgy commissions etc from the arms trades, etc. . . . as theories that "it was the royals what did it" are the sort of thing certain factors in society (dark forces/shoddy dibbler types with a smattering of old covert ops experience "at work in this nation", as the royalty sort of said to the butler, you might say) might use as the typical old distraction ploys . . . .
. . . . questions ARE more useful.
But you have to keep asking them.
As for "how do we all get out of this" - there are loads of different ways out.
"MORE LATER", to coin a phrase.
over to you, happy new year, or all hallows, or honneker. . . . whatever
good luck to all those that prepare for their "orthodox" xmas
etc