Basically you are harassing some guy because you have a poor grasp of English and probability?

Just because some silly conspiracy sites made a big deal out of a crisis management logistics exercise being carried out in a single room in the LU network, this guy is supposed to be some conspiratorial henchman. The same sites that predict "false flags" in every box of cornflakes.

So, a management team happens to be being trained in the scenario of coping with an attack when an attack happens. How often do these training sessions occur? And as for "the very same stations", they are always going to assume that Zone 1 would be a prime target because any terrorist with half a brain knows that hitting a packed train in the centre of London (the hub) is more effective that hitting an empty carriage out in Oakwood (the end of a spoke).

Give us a complete list of all the stations that were part of the hypothetical exercise, my guess is that there were far more stations involved and the complete match you nutters have "deduced" from a single ambiguous quote is the product of "selective thinking".

If 7/7 was an inside job then the probability of this guy being a factor is less than nil. And if this guy really was some establishment executioner, the last thing I'd do is doorstep him. I wonder why he hasn't any of you lot off bumped off...

Get a life and go do some real activism or keep your fantasy role playing games to your mad forums. Or do something useful like finding out out what the Saudis were on about regarding warnings that weren't acted on.

More info on Peter Power here:  http://julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html

Well done We Are Change!

Inside the Crevice -  http://www.globalcrisis.org.uk/main/PDF/Inside%20the%20Crevice.pdf

Bluewater plotters and the 7/7 cell: Peering through the crevice.... -  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/05/370395.html

Inside the Crevice: 7/7 and the Security Debacle -  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/05/370395.html

Do us all a favour and read the links posted by Crevice regarding Operation Crevice. It'll give you some juicy info on what the spooks were up to. It'll make it clear that the people named as the bombers were certainly the bombers but will also real their connections to MI6 al Qaeda assets brought to the UK to recruit for Jihad abroad.

Again, what other stations other stations were included in the hypothetical training scenario that was carried out in a room full of LU employees? My guess is that you never bothered to find out something so fundamentally important to your case.

MI6 must love you lot. A clueless distraction from their real crimes of sponsoring terrorism. The loonies shout the loudest and drown out the truth.

Well done.

Just a thought No Longer Amazed, if the answer to the riddle of the drills is so simple that only the mentally deficient would fail to grasp it.......why is Peter Power unable to articulate on this when asked....?

Seems like you are more likely to be mentally deficient to fail to grasp that these idiots haven't even researched their own claims.

Again, how many stations were included in the hypothetical disaster management role play? How often do these training sessions take place? How much damage can a bunch of LU managers do stuck in the room with some Met hasbeen playing let's pretend?

If you want to see some prime examples of "mental deficiency" go to the JT7 site and make a few google searches on some of their claims. They fall apart like cheap suits.

Here's a bit of advice on how to prove me wrong:

Under the FOIA obtain details of the training session and ansdwer these questions.
Was there anything more to the session than a bunch of management bods sitting in a room pretending that terrorists have hit Zone 1? Obtain details of how often these take place

Until you know these things any claims of impossible levels of probabilty and the profunity of teh stations is total fantasy. As far as I can see they are based on a very selective interpretation of a single comment and nothing more.

Prove me wrong!


So just because someone doesn't deign to answer totally ridiculous and insane charges it means they are hiding something? Maybe he is just sick of being hounded by idiots.

It seems like a reasonable tactic considering that a handful of people are claiming he was part of a false flag attack despite the fact there seems to be no evidence that the "rehearsal" was nothing more than people sitting in a room pretending. Oh and he is so trusted by the Establishment to carry this attack off but blurts out on a radio broadcast something that would blow the lid off it...

The same people who hounded one of the victims of the bombing claiming she was an MI5 plant simply because she didn't believe their non-researched rubbish.



However, there is a lot that suggests that the people behind the bombings were associated with people believed to be MI6 assets brought to this country to recruit for Mujaheen / al Qaeda in the Balkans.

If you want to be a brave, intrepid truthseeker: Go read up on Operation Crevice. Go research the link of the bombers to the Finsbury Park Mosque. Then go investigate the link between people like Abu Hamza and MI6.

Go find something concrete that ties the recruiters at the mosque to MI6 and you will have the biggest scandal in the history of British security services, ever.

My guess is that you won't. You won't even try. You will just continue scrying incredible tripe from ambiguity as a nice, safe cyber hobby and coming up with crap about faked photos, Mossad and technology that doesn't exist.

The leaders of the main London mosques and their helpers like Haroon Rasid Aswat, are MI6
assets. Abu Hamza and all the rest. All MI6 controlled and all helping with the perceived image

In total agreement up until this point: "all helping with the perceived image"

The problem is that the governement did something rather unusual with 7/7. They actually flat out denied that the bombers were connected to al Qaeda! They asserted that the bombers were 100% home grown. And they asserted that the attack was not related to the Iraq war... and then the suicide testomny came to light.

Not blaming al Qaeda, when you think about it, is totally weird. You would think it would be the first thing they would want to do. It certainly negates the idea that it was a false flag and these Finsbury Park assets were providing cover. The governemnt bent over backwards to avoid prosecuting any of them for 7/7.

My guess is that the Gvt. were trying to cover the tracks of the link to assets that they brought to Britatin. To know for sure, a proper independent investigation of 7/7 is needed.

There is nothing definitive out there so far to indicate whether this was a case of blowback (assets turning on their handlers) or something else. And the conspiracy loonies have made no appraoch to the subject.

I was initially amazed that the depth of this was missed by the usual conspiracy suspects. Then I came to a conclusion. These people are devotees to the 'false flag' religion. They failed to notice this amazing situation because they were too busy ranting to actually bother looking at what they were talking about.

If someone were to prove that MI6 and the British government were harbouring, training and protecting terrorists inthe UK with the intent to recruit more terrorists to circumvent the UN Security Council... the shit would blow the fan to dust.

But sadly all these people are too busy looking to replicate 9/11 Truth and hammer all the square pegs of 7/7 into the round holes of that paradigm. They are too busy hounding bomb victims, too busy making flat out fabricated claims about evidence faking and too busy chasing people who are likely totally unconnected; they can't see the wood for the trees.

To recap: bringing terrorists to the UK is illegal. To train terrorists in the UK is illegal. Funding and assisting terrorism abroad is illegal. To assist terrorists recruit in the UK is illegal. To do all this so that the UK and US could get round the UN in the Balkans is illegal.

Proving this case could result in the biggest scandal the British governement has ever seen and could see a whole domino effect of serious criminal charges. It could also bring about a massive change in foreign polict towards US/UK relations.

I'm not even goping to pretend to be a brave enough person to go chasing this. But people like J7T and 'We are change' are a total distraction from what could be the biggest threat to the Establishment that has ever bubbled to the surface.

Sadly, these people do present themselves as bold warriors of truth. Sadly, their war seems to equate nothing more than a sausage factory of flimsy bullshit that doesn't withstand cursory scrutiny.