Skip to content or view screen version

Carmel gets fruity with protesters

Jaguar | 09.12.2007 21:48 | Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco | Palestine

This afternoon 8 protesters from JAGUAR (Jews And Gentiles Undermining Apartheid Regime) attempted to blockade the main UK warehouse of Israeli agricultural produce exporter Carmel Agrexco. The action was the latest in a three year campaign against Carmel Agrexco aiming to disrupt and expose their illegal activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.






As protesters arrived on site and attempted to close the main gate, 10 security guards and site manager Amos Or quickly emerged from the warehouse. One protester was punched in the face, and the guards then locked the gate to prevent the protesThis afternoon 8 protesters from JAGUAR (Jews And Gentiles Undermining Apartheid Regime) attempted to blockade the main UK warehouse of Israeli agricultural produce exporter Carmel Agrexco. The action was the latest in a three year campaign against Carmel Agrexco aiming to disrupt and expose their illegal activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

As protesters arrived on site and attempted to close the main gate, 10 security guards and site manager Amos Or quickly emerged from the warehouse. One protester was punched in the face, and the guards then locked the gate to prevent the protestors from entering.

Shortly after, 6 police cars and 2 police vans arrived. As the protesters were leaving the area, all were stopped and searched under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

One of the protesters Steve Discombe said, “I could not believe the amount of police there, it was ridiculous. Carmel also had much more security than usual, they are clearly running scared.”

Carmel Agrexco, half owned by the Israeli state, is Israel's largest exporter of agricultural produce to the European Union. Much of its fruit, vegetables, flowers, herbs and other produce is grown and packed on illegal Israeli settlements. The company is thus complicit in war crimes under the International Criminal Court Act 2001. Carmel Agrexco is a major supplier to UK supermarkets including Marks and Spencer and Tescos.

Jaguar
- e-mail: jaguarmail@riseup.net

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Was the stop and search lawful?

09.12.2007 23:19

Are there plans to press charges against the member of staff who punched one of the protesters in the face?

Was there a Section 44 authorisation in place? If not, then the police acted unlawfully. If you didn't get copies of your Stop and Search forms, you can apply for them retrospectively.

See also the following from Liberty:
 http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/6-free-speech/s44-terrorism-act/index.shtml

dv


Steve Discombe ! !

09.12.2007 23:36

Did he have a rainbow coloured hat on?
Did he have a rainbow coloured hat on?

not this Steve Discombe ? !

;-)

runner


more legal info

10.12.2007 11:10

thanks for the link to the Liberty page - not seen it before, and useful/interesting reading.

About S44, from the Liberty page: "The power to stop and search under anti-terrorism powers should only be used when there is evidence of a specific terrorist threat."

Which, from the  http://www.activistslegalproject.org.uk page means "Under the Act terrorism is very broadly defined to include serious damage to property as well as violence to people....This is another blanket search power which must be authorised by an officer of at least the rank of assistant chief constable (a Commander in London). "

nice one mateys


Re: Was the stop and search lawful?

10.12.2007 12:27

Well, yes and no. There's always a s44 authorisation in place in London, but the searches appear to have been in breach of s45(1)(a) - it's not like the police don't know why people were at Carmel, or what they were likely to do.

streetlawyer