I would like to bring to your attention a character named Martin Ball. A few
months ago I was researching the late princess Diana's death on the internet
(specifically the "dark forces at work in this country" quote) when I came
about his claims on several internet pages. He pasted the following on
several pages, including this one:

 http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/167067/princess_dianas_inquest_to_be_heard.html

"I have no wish to intrude on anyone's personal grief but do have an
interest in getting to the truth and would like to know how an ordinary
member of the public may present evidence to the public inquest of Princess
Diana. I re-discovered the authentic Memoirs of King George III, which have
been suppressed for 150 years because they substantiate the'Royal Bigamy'.
Prince Charles and the Royal Family are neither the rightful nor lawful
heirs to the Throne, technically. I was in contact with Princess Diana and
this is the story she said before her death she was going to give to the
media. I believe this to be important and relevant. Can you help? Sign the
No 10 Downing Street e-petition at:
 http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/royalfamily/
 mllab@hotmail.com"

[quote]The authentic Memoirs of King George III have been suppressed for 150 years, because they are not in the interests of the Royal Family. The Memoirs substantiate the 'Royal Bigamy'; the Royal Family are neither the rightful nor lawful heirs to the Throne, technically. Please sign the petition, if you feel that Englishmen have a right to know the history of their own country (I, Martin Ball of Weymouth re-discovered King George III's authentic Memoirs)[/quote]

Naturally I was curious so I googled these memoirs but came up with nothing.
I then emailed him asking him what he was getting at, namely the following
five questions:

1. How did you find the authentic King George III memoirs?
2. How were they suppressed ?
3. What exactly did it say ?
4. How aren't the Royal Family the rightful heirs to the throne?
5. How were you in contact with Princess Diana ? Were you a friend of hers?

To which he replied:

1. I re-discovered the Memoirs, whilst conducting local history research
and was able to verify their authenticity with King George III's 'lost'
Great Seal of England.
2. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. No film, book, exhibition
has ever referred to the Memoirs...because they contain information
substantiating the 'Royal Bigamy'.
3. As in 2. that the life and times of King George III have been
re-written.
4. The terms of the Act of Settlement do not recognise bigamous offspring.
5. I wrote to Princess Diana following the Martin Bashir interview and she
replied, indicating her support for the publication of this story. She was
then killed. I did not know her.

The last answer was particular interesting for obvious reasons. He then
added:

"I do appreciate your scepticism but can assure you that I have all the
proof necessary."

In a previous emails he had stated:

"I have succeeded in getting in contact with the Coroner's unit at the Royal
Courts of Justice"

"This is a very difficult matter. In December 2006, the Sunday Express
wrote the story up, even sending a photographer here, only to pull it just
before publication. Honestly!!!"

A seemingly intelligent man claims he has all the proof necessary to prove
the current status of the Royal family to be fraudulent, this of course
should be thoroughly investigated. He could have revolutionary revelations
or be a habitual liar. Are you up to the job ?