Middle England judges the Climate Camp protesters
Sorrowful Sam | 14.08.2007 15:58 | Climate Camp 2007 | Climate Chaos | Other Press
Middle England, reflected by the readers of the Daily Mail have spoken. According to these greatly educated and insightful observers, the Climate Camp protesters are typically louts, scroungers, and law breakers who should be dealt with by force, intimidation and benefits assessments.
The readers of the Daily Mail have passed judgement on the Climate Camp protesters. Read their collective wisdom in the comments section, the link to which is posted below.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=475039&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&ct=5&expand=true
If these are the likes that the protesters are demonstrating on behalf of, I'd say let the fuckers choke on their own bitter bile and toxic emissions from fossil fuelled technology.
Interestingly enough, the comments all seem to be of like mind: right wing, reactionary, on the side of "law and order" (that's a joke) and feeling hard done by the protesters who are risking safety and well-being at the hands of those same enforcers of "law and order", as well as multiple deprivations. I don't know if this attitude demarcates the Daily Mail reader, or is an expression of one or a small handful of people, or simply the DM's editorial policy. But, if these people have any influence on government or reflect the values of middle England ... then god help us all!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=475039&in_page_id=1770&in_page_id=1770&ct=5&expand=true
If these are the likes that the protesters are demonstrating on behalf of, I'd say let the fuckers choke on their own bitter bile and toxic emissions from fossil fuelled technology.
Interestingly enough, the comments all seem to be of like mind: right wing, reactionary, on the side of "law and order" (that's a joke) and feeling hard done by the protesters who are risking safety and well-being at the hands of those same enforcers of "law and order", as well as multiple deprivations. I don't know if this attitude demarcates the Daily Mail reader, or is an expression of one or a small handful of people, or simply the DM's editorial policy. But, if these people have any influence on government or reflect the values of middle England ... then god help us all!
Sorrowful Sam
Comments
Hide the following 13 comments
Problem
14.08.2007 16:17
Ordinary Joe
Are these comments real?
14.08.2007 16:20
soon to arrive
Never mind the media
14.08.2007 16:28
7893N
WARNING - Wear eye protection before reading!
14.08.2007 16:31
Basically, it's down to editorial policy - the Daily Heil can't let the world change for the better - if things were rosy, what the hell would they write about? They only like to focus on doom and destruction. The sad thing is how many basically good-hearted people read that chronicle of hate every day, thinking it is a quality newspaper because of the posh typeface at the top - and then forget to wash the insides of their heads out!
My only consolation is that by resorting to stereotypes and lies, they reveal that they are rather jumpy about our movement. I'll bet they are!
I did send a response, anyone care to place a wager on whether it gets printed.... any takers?! No? OF COURSE! They don't print anything that makes sense (or anything by a jobless, scrounging, long-haired terrorist!!!!).
Jani the scrounger who only wants to upset decent hardworking peoples holidays.
Homepage: http://www.thehubbub.org.uk
Daily Wail
14.08.2007 16:35
Unfortunately the Labour Party tends to react to the smallest article in the Daily Wail with a fresh round of legislation.
A N Other
free speech
14.08.2007 16:42
fast freddie
Fast Freddie "survives"?
14.08.2007 17:48
Freddie, we will all have to get away from the notion that we are entitled to "convenience" in our mode of travel, and in a few other things besides. In any case, most of the world (the Third World) doesn't live like this.
Spartaca
Homepage: http://www.mumblingsfromacitizensadvocate.blogspot.com
Ignore
14.08.2007 17:49
Problem is, that if everyone flocks to their website to read their bile then their hit count goes up. Which means they can charge more to thier advertisers. Dont fund them, they are scum who live off their ability to incense the rational.
Guido
No free speech at the Daily Mail
14.08.2007 17:51
As for "ordinary joe" - I don't care if people have different opinions from myself, so stuff the sarcasm you dink, and go and read a selection of the vile dross served up as comments before you blithely disregard what the OP was presumably trying to get at.
O.A.P. (Original Angry Protester)
BAA employs Trolls!
14.08.2007 18:27
Pity the Trolls are so crap. The man on the Arriva train is a gem. When they privatised the railways it was with a promise of better services and cheaper fares - better and cheaper was it mate?
Even Daily Mail readers are going to have to face the truth, unfortunately probably only when their homes are knee deep in overflowing sewage and flood water. Funny the government couldn't find 1800 policemen to help all those flooded out in Gloucestershire, Hull and Yorkshire. I guess as on 7/7 chasing hippies and kids for politicians and big buisness is more important than protecting the people who pay their wages.
Good luck to all at the climate camp!
Billy Goat Gruff
public relations
14.08.2007 19:26
jock
I want my money back!
14.08.2007 22:41
Bonuses for BAA staff who post abuse on websites! I have a flight to Barbados for the first person to link dreadlocks and body piercings with box cutters and 2-stage peroxide explosives! (Hey, why ARE they making their own yogurt....?)
BAA's Head of Marketing
Written ironically - maybe?!
15.08.2007 06:39
Cathy Climate Chaos
Cathy Climate Chaos
Homepage: http://theonetonners.blogspot.com