Skip to content or view screen version

Space tourism, a biggest threat to Global Warming than aviation

Tom | 13.08.2007 16:19

The economic bonanza of the last decade has increased ten fold the number of billionaires in the industrialized nations, making space tourism a financially viable enterprise for the first time in history, and at the same time increasing the risk of irreversible environmental meltdown and bringing the point of no return much closer than expected.

Dennis Tito, a California based multi millionaire was the first space tourist on 28th April 2001, but since then this industry has grown at an incredible rate, current plans include regular travel and a space hotel complex to accommodate the influx of space tourists.

The Russian Federal Space Agency already provides transport with flights fully booked until 2009, and a series of UK companies are planning to cash in this lucrative business including Virgin, with a clear disregard for the effects that this new leisure activity will certainly have on the environment.

Market research shows that space travel is very popular among the new rich, and predictions stipulate that like aviation the space travel industry will find most of its business carrying passengers in the near future, however each of these rocket launches will increase the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the equivalent of around a tenth of all aviation emissions put together for a similar distance, with the extra added negative contribution of releasing these pollutants at an even higher altitude where the detrimental effects are far more acute.

Choosing a low carbon footprint transport method is more important than ever as well as reducing the need for long travel, but until we address who is the biggest new theat to global warming today all these efforts may be in vain.

Tom

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

My first reaction

13.08.2007 17:10

...was that you are talking nonsense.

That's still my second reaction but there is a germ of truth in what you say. The ultra-rich are responsible for more pollution than the rest of the population. They buy more crap and they travel in more damaging ways.
"Space tourism" is never going to be an issue worth worrying about. Private jets, constant business travel and first-class-only airlines, though? A different story.

CH


Oh come on please ....

13.08.2007 17:22

in the next 20-40 years there might be less then 100 people who could afford that. normally space "tourists" are just extra "luggage" on a mission which is run anyway. this is a completely tiny issue in comparison to carbon emmissions by cars, power plants whatsoever. i think we have really more important issues to work on right now.

from outer space


Untrue

13.08.2007 17:42

The Russians are using space tourism to subsidise their space programme and provide publicity, not as a sole commercial venture. The chances are, the rockets would still go into space without rich people on them, they would just cost the Russian government a little bit more. It's better to target the wealthy for their use of other forms of transport that are doing more damage to the environment than the four or five dozen (mostly unmanned) rockets thrown into space every year.

Assess


Your all muppets

14.08.2007 04:21

space travel is a waste of tax payers money.It's not what we voted for.We voted for a better world,less hunger,better housing.Space travel is like arms dealing,a way of using our tax to finance a few to achive fuckall.And to make a lot of capitol for the few so they can manipulate the money they make to continue their own ends.Wake up you drongo's

HEAD MUPPET


like the idea

14.08.2007 11:22

I quite like the idea of shooting the rich into outer space on a rocket - just as long as that if they want to come back they must be burnt on re-entry ( and perhaps make the rocket a soft- top convertible sports model like their fucking cars )

mark