Skip to content or view screen version

drug use and Barry Bonds

72 nessie on top | 10.08.2007 07:40 | Culture | Health | World

Bonds records need to be suspended as he used steroids to cheat the game, his team and his fans. this is what should go down in history.

Court for Barry Bonds?


Barry Bonds has broken Hank Aaron's record of 755 home runs. One would think this would be a celebratory time for Major League Baseball's star drug abuser, but a grand jury has been investigating Bonds since 2005.

While the subject is a national fixation, SF IMC has led the factual reporting on Bonds's records and drug addiction. According to SF IMC , in a transcript of his testimony Bonds said that he had "received and used clear and cream substances from his personal strength trainer during the 2003 baseball season, but was told they were the nutritional supplement flaxseed oil and a rubbing balm for arthritis." (wink,wink..)

Everybody knew the cream was a drug - that was the reason they were using it. Bonds' denial, simply, appears to be a crock.

During Bonds' testimony on Dec. 4, 2003, federal prosecutors presented Bonds with documents asserting that he had used steroids and human growth hormone during a seven-year period. Bonds still publicly says he has not used illegal drugs, snickering under his breath.

Bonds is entitled to a trial, like all Americans. So let's give him one. He should be tried in drug court for use of illegal substances and, if found to have used them, should be given mandatory treatment and prison time. Drug court allows for people to be convicted of non-aggressive drug charges without being sent to jail, rather they are given the help they need in rehab programs. This would give Bonds a chance to get clean.

The Department of Justice should assure that Bonds is tried for his alleged crimes. Bonds has said that if he has taken any steroids, then he did so unknowingly. The chances of this being true are almost nonexistent.

Beyond drug court, to mandate treatment or (if he refuses treatment) prison, he could be tried in criminal court for perjury, with his entourage (who are likely witnesses to his conversations, if not use) placed under oath. And what of amphetamines (which players downplay as unimportant "greenies"), and what of hard-to-test human growth hormone? Time Magazine reported on July 16, "His head has visibly swelled, a telltale sign of human growth hormone." In addition, Bonds already admitted (Associated Press and ESPN reported Jan. 10 and Jan. 11 this year) taking amphetamines, but predictably claimed he didn't know what it was when he got it from a teammate. He did not appeal the positive test result. These are lame excuses.

Parents need to be able to tell their children that what Bonds did was ethically and legally wrong, as well as medically dangerous. Right now, youth see that the best way to get ahead is sports is by taking steroids, HGH, amphetamines and other illegal drugs, and this is an unacceptable message. Right now, the message is not zero tolerance, but zero punishment. Children need to be aware that steroids and human growth hormones could have harmful and dangerous side effects - from liver and heart disease to shrunken body parts, hair in wrong places, and - just ask the family of wrestler Chris Benoit - schizophrenic, murderous rages.

If this were track and field, Bonds' admissions would mean two years without his job. Yet baseball is silent and does nothing. In the weeks leading up to the record, as the Giants went from one hostile ballpark to another, Bonds did not receive the level of ovation that Aaron did. Boos were abundant. However, a little less love is not accountability. Drug Court and treatment are. Bonds records need to be suspended as he used steroids to cheat the game, his team and his fans. this is what should go down in history.



for more information on this topic go to;

www.sfimc.org

and

www.transbaynessie.net


72 nessie on top

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Misunderstanding?

10.08.2007 10:16

"So let's give him one. He should be tried in drug court for use of illegal substances and, if found to have used them, should be given mandatory treatment and prison time."

The issue is not about ILLEGAL substances. Much broader than that.

The fact that some professional sport association declares that competitors in this sport may not use certain drugs -- can be thrown out of the sport or otherwsie sanctioned if they do, etc. does not make use of these substances illegal in the criminal sense.

Of course this can get complicated. Let's say that the sports association requires that the althletes take an oath before a notary, etc. that they have not used the forbidden substances and are then found to have done so. There might be a criminal charge possible over the uttering of a false oath. But see the difference? It's not the drug taking with which they could be charged but the perjury.

For example -- with the recent scandals in the Tour de France, there is the matter of "blood doping". In spite of the term "doping" associated with the procedure no "dope" or other illegal substance is involved. They are referring to transfusions of blood concentrated in red blood cells (which for a brief time, will increase the oxygen processing capacity). That's not ILLEGAL -- simply not permitted within the sport by sporting association rules.

In other examples (say the anabolic steroids) it's not the recpient of the drug who would face charges for "dispensing a drug without a prescription" (where the drug, though legal, may only be given by a doctor's prescription --- and of course a doctor who gave script not justified by medical need might also face charges).

Mike Novack
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com


case unproven

10.08.2007 13:06

just one, wee, titchy problem here - or, rather, three of them.
1. he has never failed a drugs test
2. the legal supplements above are in widespread usage amongst sportsmen
3. how x can you prove he wasn't telling the truth above, or that 'everyone knew they were drugs'. gonna say who this 'everyone was' then?

JC


"nessie"

11.08.2007 18:50

This is a forgery, one of many. For some idea how often nessie's name gets forged, Google "nessie indymedia forgery" and see what comes up.

 http://tinyurl.com/2tcga5

this is a forgery


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments