Iran Sentences Two Journalists To Death
Kawah | 03.08.2007 14:25 | Birmingham | World
The Iranian judiciary confirmed that two journalist from the country's Kurdish minority have been sentenced to death, a rare verdict against media people here, the official Islamic Republic News Agency reported on Tuesday.
Adnan Hassanpour and Hiva Boutimar have been sentenced to execution on the charge of Moharebeh," the agency quoted Ali Reza Jamshidi, spokesman of judiciary, as saying. Moharebeh, which literally means "fighting" in classical Arabic, is used in Iran's Sharia law to describe a major crime against the religion and the Islamic state.
The official news agency did not specify what crime the two Kurdish journalists were precisely accused of. There was no immediate comment on when or how the sentence could be executed.
The journalists were deemed activists in Sanandaj, the capital of the western Iranian province of Kurdistan, bordering Iraq. They were detained after Kurds protested in Sanandaj in 2005.
At the time, police arrested dozens of people who attended a pro-Kurdish rally after rioters burned cars and smashed shop windows during a protest over the killing of a Kurdish activist by Iranian police.
Clashes with security forces and arrests led to more demonstrations, with shopkeepers partly shuttering their businesses and the government closing down two newspapers and detaining journalists and activists. The unrest also rocked several Kurdish towns in northwestern Iran.
The Kurdish opposition group PEJAK, which stands in Kurdish for the "Party of Free Life of Kurdistan," called on Kurds in western Iran to begin a campaign of civil disobedience. The group has clashed with Iranian security forces.
Tehran accuses the United States of stoking ethnic minority tensions in northwestern Iran's Kurdish regions.
Reporters Without Borders denounced the sentences.
"These death sentences are outrageous and shameful,” the press freedom organization said. “They show how little Iran is bothered by international humanitarian law. They also show how determined it is to use every possible means to silence the most outspoken journalists and human rights activists.”
http://www.kurdistantv.net/nivisek.asp?ser=20&cep=&nnimre=4819
The official news agency did not specify what crime the two Kurdish journalists were precisely accused of. There was no immediate comment on when or how the sentence could be executed.
The journalists were deemed activists in Sanandaj, the capital of the western Iranian province of Kurdistan, bordering Iraq. They were detained after Kurds protested in Sanandaj in 2005.
At the time, police arrested dozens of people who attended a pro-Kurdish rally after rioters burned cars and smashed shop windows during a protest over the killing of a Kurdish activist by Iranian police.
Clashes with security forces and arrests led to more demonstrations, with shopkeepers partly shuttering their businesses and the government closing down two newspapers and detaining journalists and activists. The unrest also rocked several Kurdish towns in northwestern Iran.
The Kurdish opposition group PEJAK, which stands in Kurdish for the "Party of Free Life of Kurdistan," called on Kurds in western Iran to begin a campaign of civil disobedience. The group has clashed with Iranian security forces.
Tehran accuses the United States of stoking ethnic minority tensions in northwestern Iran's Kurdish regions.
Reporters Without Borders denounced the sentences.
"These death sentences are outrageous and shameful,” the press freedom organization said. “They show how little Iran is bothered by international humanitarian law. They also show how determined it is to use every possible means to silence the most outspoken journalists and human rights activists.”
http://www.kurdistantv.net/nivisek.asp?ser=20&cep=&nnimre=4819
Kawah
e-mail:
kawah2000@gmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.better-life@better-world.com
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
'revolutionary' communists
03.08.2007 17:02
anarchist
Also well known
04.08.2007 08:17
Danny
LOL
04.08.2007 10:58
anarchist
anarchist
04.08.2007 11:38
And the death penalty would be their first choice of smear because the US has such a great record it would love to show off.
Here's some more war propaganda:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/
http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-index-eng
And these evil scheming swines are probably the worst:
http://www.worldcoalition.org/modules/accueil/index.php?sel_lang=english
Note that a US ally is the 2nd worst offender and the US itself is in the top four:
http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty-facts-eng
HMSO
whoosh
05.08.2007 15:47
So why don't you kill me ?
"do you honestly think mi5 would come on here and leave a little comment saying how shit dictorships are?"
I know that to be a fact - an obvious fact - and can prove it. I don't have the slightest indication that you are an anarchist though.
"fucking hell mate. anarchism is against all states, all dictorships. ESPECIALLY those who carry out executions for people who go against the word of the government."
You are wrong. Especially nothing. The most seemingly benign state should be opposed as surely the most repressive.
"reality check danny, there are other states in the world that are equally as shit (if not worse) as Britain and the U.S."
No, there aren't, not today.
Danny
Danny, youre a moron
08.08.2007 17:58
Anyway as much as i despise the british government and hate the free market capitalism were subjected to i'd sooner live here than in Iran where any dissent is criminalised as "un-Islamic", i think Iran is a lasting lesson to those on the left who think that cooperating with radical Islam is a good idea, it isnt a new bandwaggon and the lefties who tried it last time, having been judged by allah, are probably burning in eternal damnation as we speak!
"anti-imperialism" is so short sighted in that it tends to lend tacit support to oppressive and barbaric states under the illusion that these countries are somehow progressive because theyre not in the good books of more powerful states. They berate british industries and governments for selling arms to one oppressive state and then when the british state turns on another oppressive state it all of a sudden becomes some bastion of working class power, its as if a state that is in conflict with our state is automatically on our side. Dont be foolish, if you were in Iran talking of equality and direct democracy you'd probably be on the inside of an Iranian prison before you could say Ayatollah Khomeini.
All states are oppressive, some more than others, supporting weaker states because our government is seen to be in conflict with them is a huge kick in the teeth to the people of countries like Iran who are risking their lives trying to push things foward.
BruisedShins