Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

S.O.S. - Classifying all paedophiles as dangerous offenders

Charity Sweet | 25.07.2007 11:21 | Indymedia | Repression | Terror War | London

I read a very disturbing article on Indymedia and it seems to have disappeared. It was titled "free speech must remain free".

England needs to come to terms with the crisis that has been set upon this great nation. Paedophiles are not being dealt with correctly within the judiciary.

WHY?

Sexual attraction to children is harmless? The rights of a paedophile are akin to the rights of a homosexual? I don't f*cking think so.

Anyone who believes that sexual attraction to children is harmless needs to shake their head and get in touch with reality.

Paedophilia is the most egregious act of all humanity towards any child.

I am proud to say I am a fag-hag and I love my gay mates and there is nothing paedophilic in their nature, by any means or of any sorts. Homosexuals are not paedophiles... they have absolutely nothing in common. What two consenting adults get up to is between those adults. What an adult sexually forces upon a child is a matter for the nation to deal with promptly and properly.

I have a very clear problem with apologist jackasses like the author of said disappeared article who supported the right to freely express adult sexual attraction towards children. Said people who support paedophilia need to be sectioned under the mental health act; in my mind - this train of thought is most sickening and definitely depraved.

And lets be clear on this matter - crystal clear: what I despise is the paedophile who hides behind the gay banner, purporting to be homosexual and instead being the gravest threat to all humanities children - a paedophile.

Homosexuals are not a threat to society - they are a valuable part of it as love is love, no matter what the gender. Sexually preying on the weakest and smallest individuals in society is the most violent act against all of society as the ramifications and scarring of a sexual assault against a child last a lifetime and reach deep into the family unit, creating chaos and mahem, so much so, it inevitably spills over into the community and into society, in general.

All paedophiles should be classed as dangerous offenders - full stop. A dangerous offender is defined by two factors:1. the severity of his crime 2. the likelihood to recommit the offence.

Why aren't paedophiles classed as the dangerous offenders that all of society acknowledges them to be?

Who writes the laws and who bangs the gavel?

I saw my mate in court, after she had been, yet again, assaulted in a courtroom, arrested on a fraudulently obtained warrant by CX 674 Roger S. Smith of Charing Cross Police Station and held in cells over night, only to be brought up into the docks by two CIRCO staff.

What was her crime? She states clearly, "Stop killing children for money." - Barbara Tucker.

Babs stands firmly footed against this government and their illegal war in Iraq that has caused so much suffering for the Iraqi peoples and especially the children. Infanticide, genocide, theft, rape and torture are the crimes of Blair's and Brown's government.

Immediately before Babs was brought into the dock, I watched a man in a nice suit walk freely into the courtroom and confidently stroll into the dock. He plead guilty to having some 2500 images of children of a sexual nature, some 500 movies, yada, yada, yada. He plead guilty to charge after charger after charge after charge after charge...

THEN HE WAS GIVEN UNCONDITIONAL BAIL.

THE B*STARD WALKED OUT OF THE COURTROOM FREE A S A BIRD AWAITING HIS SENTENCE WHICH WILL, NO DOUBT, TURN OUT TO BE A SLAP ON THE WRIST.

HOW MANY CHILDREN SUFFERED EXTREME SEXUAL VIOLENCE FOR HIS SEXUAL GRATIFICATION?

WHICH *SSHOLE OF SOCIETY WOULD CONDONE THIS BEHAVIOUR, LET ALONE STATE THAT NONSES HAVE RIGHTS?

IS ANYONE IS THIS COUNTRY PREPARED TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD FROM THE SEXUAL PREDATORS THAT HAVE NOT ESCAPED INTO OUR COMMUNITIES, BUT HAVE BEEN SET FREE BY THE JUDICIARY TO RE-OFFEND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN?

WHERE ARE THE MEN AND WOMEN WITH BOLLOCKS IN THIS GREAT NATION?

ISN'T IT TIME WE CALLED A SPADE A SPADE AND PERMANENTLY SEGREGATED ALL THE PAEDOPHILES FROM ENGLISH SOCIETY?

ASK ANY PERSON ON THE STREET AND I AM CERTAIN THEY WILL SUGGEST A FAR MORE VIOLENT RESPONSE TO THESE IMMORAL MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE. PERMANENT SEGREGATION FROM SOCIETY IN COMPLETE ISOLATION IS WHAT I AM PROPOSING.

ALL PAEDOPHILES NEED TO BE LOCKED UP FOR THEIR OWN GOOD AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY, TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AGAINST BECOMING THE SEXUAL PREY OF KNOWN DANGEROUS OFFENDERS.

Choke on that response... bloody nonse apologists ... hell is a long time a blazing!

Charity Sweet XXX

Charity Sweet
- e-mail: charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk

Comments

Display the following 16 comments

  1. Paedophilia is not an action — BLueRibbon
  2. Blueribbon nonse apologist - go f*ck yourself — Charity Sweet
  3. Yet Again.... — BLueRibbon
  4. Go away paedo — Little Nell
  5. This is a very silly argument... — R. Petitjean
  6. sympathy — R
  7. Save the nonces? — Campaign for the Preservation of Beasts
  8. RE: RP's comment — BLueRibbon
  9. Reply — R. Petitjean
  10. No Platform — Fred
  11. RE: No Platform — BLueRibbon
  12. lock up all nonses - permanently — Charity
  13. Re: Fred — R. Petitjean
  14. Shall we sweep paedophilia under the rug? — Charity
  15. Ban all men ! — blip
  16. Is Madeleine Abright a nonce? — Paul