Sorry folks, but it did happen and it was a creeping event that can be witnessed by the increasingly supine and self-critical posts on the wire.

So, someone explain - on the open news-wire please - any other reason for a main feature to be pulled simply because it was critical of Browns role in terrorism ? You know, I wrote an excellent post about the horrors of self-censorship earlier today, but nobody can read it now as it was self-censored by the author of the original article.

And I can see why. Without asking to be, I was added to your mailing list. Now, I met an MI5 agent through here who used to post as MI5. He has close friends who have admin rights here who really shouldn't have. I'd be happy to publish their names here but I know they would be erased and hidden. It is telling that this place is so insecure that real debate is hidden.

Now, from something else I learned from IndyMedia, I have enough information to take legal action against an Irish doctor who conributes to IM-IE. I promised I wouldn't, but I promised that to someone I believed to be an activist.
I know two self confessed pederasts in the peace-movement and I have heard of other rapists. Similarly I have buttoned my lip until now.

There was obviously a main feature hidden here earlier that had come in from smears from pseudo-activists who have manipulated their way to IM admin credentials. I do know names, dates and times. If I am not allowed to even alude to them here, then I can in other websites and media outlets. But really, "sorry folks but it didn't happen" isn't what I call rational argument.