Skip to content or view screen version

The True Cost of ID Cards

mazey54 | 26.06.2007 00:57

The true cost of ID cards are not just to the taxpayer’s purse but go much deeper and have a truly disturbing impact, threatening our way of life forever. You will not only pay financially but it will also cost you personal privacy and possibility your identity.

By Mick Meaney
RINF Alternative News

The true cost of ID cards are not just to the taxpayer’s purse but go much deeper and have a truly disturbing impact, threatening our way of life forever. You will not only pay financially but it will also cost you personal privacy and possibility your identity.

The privacy eroding ID card scheme has suffered another set back as the government internally worry over procurement, costs and program management.

The controversial scheme costs £5.3bn and 50 million UK citizens are set to receive the cards over the next 10 years. Costs have risen by £400m since just October.

James Hall, chief executive of the U.K. Identity and Passport Service, which is in charge of the ID card project said a “major” procurement process was set to begin, although “we’re not quite ready yet,” but did not state when this would begin.

It amounts to nothing more than the “numbering of the population” as the plan not only stops with ID cards, as all information will be passed into the NIR (National Identity Register) creating one central database containing our private information and the widespread use of biometric technology for mass fingerprinting and iris scanning.

ID cards are being sold to the British public as a precaution to terrorism, although no evidence exists to suggest they act as an effective deterrent and ministers have already stated ID cards will not be able to prevent future attacks.

In fact, experts state ID cards diminishes security, as the central database opens new opportunities for identity thieves and data fraudsters.

Privacy advocates have listed over 20 problems with the scheme including

Discrimination
Lifelong surveillance
Identity fraud
Benefit fraud and abuse of public services
Spiralling costs
Untested technologies
Unsecured and costly technologies
Severe punishments may be inflicted without judicial process
Any person can be added to the Register without their consent
No duty to ensure that such data is accurate, or criterion of accuracy
The technology used is riddled with errors, open to attacks and the chance that you or I could become an ‘un-person’ is fast becoming a reality.

The Conservative Party are also making noise about the plans, with Shadow Home Secretary David Davis recently writing to Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O’Donnell.

“I urge you to consider very carefully the government’s position, in advance of the roll-out of the scheme later this year,” the letter said. “As a matter of financial prudence, it is incumbent upon you to ensure that public money is not wasted, and contractual obligations are not incurred, investing in a scheme with such a high risk of not being implemented.”

For more information and to find out what you can do to prevent national ID cards being enforced go to  http://www.no2id.net and  http://www.defy-id.org.uk

mazey54

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Instead of

26.06.2007 11:50

stopping terrorism it will cause it.People don't want this intrusion and will disrupt the communication of info anyway they can.i have already heard of ideas to pour petrol down BT manhole covers to destroy the telephone system.This something a lot of people feel very stong about.

Strong Objector


Oyster world

26.06.2007 13:00

Still suprised at how many activists in London use the Oyster cards that Livingstone is pushing (and it IS pushing ).
Already there has been a leak that these will be used as part of security for the 2012 Property Speculation Olympics.
Whilst at the moment you do not need to register with name and address I would imagine it won't take long before that aspect returns.
Burn your oyster card.

The mayor is a prick


The inflated cost of citizenship

26.06.2007 21:58

In 1995 renewing a British passport cost £24. In 2005 the new European British passport cost £42. The government has increased that to £72. A passport is a state monopoly. It is required to pass between border checks run by states whether you approve of or subscribe to that state. Now someone with a Luxembourg passport can travel as freely, and with as much protection and far less risk of terrorist attack, compared to a British passport. A European Luxembourg passport costs less than £3 to buy. The European Union is supposed to be a single market where goods and services are equal across all the member states. Now I don't want a British passport as I don't consider myself British, but I still want to travel without state hinderance, so why can't I buy a Luxembourg passort ? I have the same rights as a Pole to work anywhere in the EU, but a Pole only has to pay £15 for a passport. So I have have to compete in the EU market against people from Poland and Luxemboug, why doesn't the British passport service have to compete ?

A Spanish passport costs about £10. So where are the extra costs involved in producing a British passport ? Ministers have claimed that a predicted 70% of the predicted cost of the national ID card scheme was accounted for by improving the security of passports. I never voted for a national ID card scheme, and even if I had it should be self-financing. This is a clear case of a new unpopular policy being subsidised indirectly. The goverment says entry to the US requires the new passport. I am never going to travel to the US so why should I subsidise the extra costs for those who do ? Why not give British citizens the choice of paying for the ordinary passport and pass the extra costs of travelling to the US to those who require a UK passport acceptable in the US ?

The latest passports contain RFID chips that the government claims aids security but I believe makes it less secure. RFID chips can be read remotely - someone wouldn't even have to touch your passport to steal your identity. These chips are warranted for two years but the passport lasts for ten years. If the chip stops working the passport is still valid. So if you passport was microwaved for 20 seconds, it would still be valid but the chip would blow.

I have a Dutch residency card which is enough ID to get me around most of Europe without a passport, although ironically not to the place I was born and raised.

Danny
- Homepage: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2005/12/01/000016406_20051201150541/Rendered/PDF/wps3783.pdf