Lieberman hides from CASMII
Rostam Pourzal | 19.06.2007 09:10 | Anti-militarism | Terror War | World
Around 35 of us opponents of war on Iran (mobilized on two days notice with help from CASMII) were told Thursday afternoon at Senator Lieberman's office in Washington that we couldn't actually meet with him. The appointment Code Pink activists had secured earlier in the week, a day after the Senator said on national TV that Iran should be attacked militarily if it "doesn't play by the rule," was thus scrapped unilaterally. We were told by Lieberman's staff we were denied a meeting because they divined our intention was to stage a sit-in and hunger strike!
Around 35 of us opponents of war on Iran (mobilized on two days notice with help from CASMII) were told Thursday afternoon at Senator Lieberman's office in Washington that we couldn't actually meet with him. The appointment Code Pink activists had secured earlier in the week, a day after the Senator said on national TV that Iran should be attacked militarily if it "doesn't play by the rule," was thus scrapped unilaterally. We were told by Lieberman's staff we were denied a meeting because they divined our intention was to stage a sit-in and hunger strike!
Well, our group did include Leslie, who had fasted since Monday in protest. But, we explained, we were there really for a civil dialog of the kind we wished to see between the US and Iran. Warnings by the Capitol Police that we'd all be expelled followed stonewalling by the office staff.
Then Leslie, weakened by her five-day fast, showed the beautiful photos (enlarged) of people that she had taken on a recent trip to Iran and passionately pleaded for a chance to tell Lieberman not to harm them. She repeatedly told the Senator's aides, "Iranians are the most warm, lovely, friendly people I have ever met … They love Americans … They treated me better than I'm ever treated here in my own country… This is a nation that has not attacked anyone in more than 200 years. How can the Senator threaten to bomb them?" Our group's video cameras were rolling the whole time.
After one of us warned that Leslie might become the next Cindy Sheehan and shadow Senator Lieberman everywhere in protest, three senior aides agreed to have a discussion with three of us if the rest waited in the hallway.
So while most in our group got better acquainted and strategized for the future in the hallway, Leslie, Bob, and I talked privately with the Senator's foreign policy advisor, legislative director, and chief of staff. For over an hour our trio argued in the Senator's conference room that even if the administration's concerns about Iran were real, a military solution was no solution at all and would only complicate things further. We insisted that it is in the interest of neither the US or Israel to start another war. The senior aides kept claiming that US intelligence showed Iran was causing the deaths of US troops in Iraq and the leadership of nations neighboring Iran were terrified by Iran's expansionism. We asked for and received no evidence backing these claims.
Bob (Middle East analyst at Just Foreign Policy) told them of a perception that Lieberman and other powerful extremists are trying to derail the historic and still tentative negotiations between Iran and the US that began last month in Baghdad. Their side tried but could not convince us that Lieberman is supportive of dialog with Iran. Nor did we agree with their logic that the threat of force was needed to make diplomacy work. We challenged them when one claimed the European Union substitutes for Washington in talks on Iran's nuclear program (even he didn't sound convinced of what he said).
Leslie, the hunger striker, argued Iran could not possibly have an interest in destabilizing Iraq, as Lieberman had claimed Sunday. She also noted that everyone she met in Iran was superbly open and welcoming towards her American peace delegation. She argued the US had no more right to rid Iranians of their government than did Iran to install a new government in Washington. I told Liberman's senior aides the Senator's complaints of alleged Iranian meddling in Iraq would make sense only if Iran had invaded Mexico or Canada with 150,000 troops, too!
While the three of us argued with the Lieberman team, Medea Benjamin of Code Pink led a teach-in for the rest of our group in the hallway, with about ten Capitol Policemen keeping watch and video cameras recording.
Although we did not seem to entirely convince Lieberman's staff, we thought we made an impact and the Senator might in the future think twice before mouthing off about bombing Iran. Just to be sure, we assured his aides we represented a much larger constituency and we would be back more forcefully if the Senator repeats the threat of force instead of actively supporting dialog. We also left a very handsomely framed enlarged photo of three Iranian children smiling for the camera as a gift for the Senator.
Well, our group did include Leslie, who had fasted since Monday in protest. But, we explained, we were there really for a civil dialog of the kind we wished to see between the US and Iran. Warnings by the Capitol Police that we'd all be expelled followed stonewalling by the office staff.
Then Leslie, weakened by her five-day fast, showed the beautiful photos (enlarged) of people that she had taken on a recent trip to Iran and passionately pleaded for a chance to tell Lieberman not to harm them. She repeatedly told the Senator's aides, "Iranians are the most warm, lovely, friendly people I have ever met … They love Americans … They treated me better than I'm ever treated here in my own country… This is a nation that has not attacked anyone in more than 200 years. How can the Senator threaten to bomb them?" Our group's video cameras were rolling the whole time.
After one of us warned that Leslie might become the next Cindy Sheehan and shadow Senator Lieberman everywhere in protest, three senior aides agreed to have a discussion with three of us if the rest waited in the hallway.
So while most in our group got better acquainted and strategized for the future in the hallway, Leslie, Bob, and I talked privately with the Senator's foreign policy advisor, legislative director, and chief of staff. For over an hour our trio argued in the Senator's conference room that even if the administration's concerns about Iran were real, a military solution was no solution at all and would only complicate things further. We insisted that it is in the interest of neither the US or Israel to start another war. The senior aides kept claiming that US intelligence showed Iran was causing the deaths of US troops in Iraq and the leadership of nations neighboring Iran were terrified by Iran's expansionism. We asked for and received no evidence backing these claims.
Bob (Middle East analyst at Just Foreign Policy) told them of a perception that Lieberman and other powerful extremists are trying to derail the historic and still tentative negotiations between Iran and the US that began last month in Baghdad. Their side tried but could not convince us that Lieberman is supportive of dialog with Iran. Nor did we agree with their logic that the threat of force was needed to make diplomacy work. We challenged them when one claimed the European Union substitutes for Washington in talks on Iran's nuclear program (even he didn't sound convinced of what he said).
Leslie, the hunger striker, argued Iran could not possibly have an interest in destabilizing Iraq, as Lieberman had claimed Sunday. She also noted that everyone she met in Iran was superbly open and welcoming towards her American peace delegation. She argued the US had no more right to rid Iranians of their government than did Iran to install a new government in Washington. I told Liberman's senior aides the Senator's complaints of alleged Iranian meddling in Iraq would make sense only if Iran had invaded Mexico or Canada with 150,000 troops, too!
While the three of us argued with the Lieberman team, Medea Benjamin of Code Pink led a teach-in for the rest of our group in the hallway, with about ten Capitol Policemen keeping watch and video cameras recording.
Although we did not seem to entirely convince Lieberman's staff, we thought we made an impact and the Senator might in the future think twice before mouthing off about bombing Iran. Just to be sure, we assured his aides we represented a much larger constituency and we would be back more forcefully if the Senator repeats the threat of force instead of actively supporting dialog. We also left a very handsomely framed enlarged photo of three Iranian children smiling for the camera as a gift for the Senator.
Rostam Pourzal
Homepage:
http://www.payvand.com/news/07/jun/1163.html