macdonalds are trying to get the definition of mcjob changed
not a mcemployee | 24.05.2007 03:50
mcdonalds, hoping to gather public support in order to change the perception that a mcjob is a desirable job.
Mcdonalds have set up a website: http://www.changethedefinition.com/ to petition dictionary writers to buckle under corporate pressure.
Registrant: Emma Bailey, 30 Farringdon Street, London, London, London EC4A 4EA GB
Domain name: CHANGETHEDEFINITION.COM
Administrative Contact: Bailey, Emma emma.bailey@barkers.co.uk
30 Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4EA GB +44.2076341126
Has set up a website on behalf of Barkers http://www.barkers.co.uk/
Who offer a recruitment service. Maybe Barker Mcjobs keep them awake at night.
The petition reads
"We, the undersigned, petition the UK’s dictionary houses to change the current definition of McJob to better reflect the reality of service sector jobs. McJob is currently defined in the dictionary as “an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector.” This definition is out of date, out of touch with reality and most importantly is insulting to those hard-working, talented and committed people who serve the public every day in the UK. As the namesake for this derogatory term, this prejudice is felt most sharply by the 67,000 people who pursue careers and jobs at McDonald’s in the UK."
(fair use quotation from a publically accessible web site http://www.changethedefinition.com/)
and claims to be nothing to do with recruitment.
The term is not derogatory. It describes a job not a person. You cannot degrade a job. Especially if the job is degrading. The definition insults no person employed in the McJob and to suggest that it does is outrageous. It is more insulting that a corporation would wish to have a definition changed without fundamentally changing the job definition.
In promoting this corporate puff piece, McDonalds have enlisted the BBC ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6683365.stm). This gives the corporation access to a large audience. It is, essentially free advertising. The kind of advertising that costs a lot. The kind of advertising that could be held to demonstrate a meanness of spirit inherent in the creators of McJobs. A term first used in a 1991 book and hiow the term is most commonly used. The attempt bullies people into corporate speak by attempting to rewrite the language.
Registrant: Emma Bailey, 30 Farringdon Street, London, London, London EC4A 4EA GB
Domain name: CHANGETHEDEFINITION.COM
Administrative Contact: Bailey, Emma emma.bailey@barkers.co.uk
30 Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4EA GB +44.2076341126
Has set up a website on behalf of Barkers http://www.barkers.co.uk/
Who offer a recruitment service. Maybe Barker Mcjobs keep them awake at night.
The petition reads
"We, the undersigned, petition the UK’s dictionary houses to change the current definition of McJob to better reflect the reality of service sector jobs. McJob is currently defined in the dictionary as “an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector.” This definition is out of date, out of touch with reality and most importantly is insulting to those hard-working, talented and committed people who serve the public every day in the UK. As the namesake for this derogatory term, this prejudice is felt most sharply by the 67,000 people who pursue careers and jobs at McDonald’s in the UK."
(fair use quotation from a publically accessible web site http://www.changethedefinition.com/)
and claims to be nothing to do with recruitment.
The term is not derogatory. It describes a job not a person. You cannot degrade a job. Especially if the job is degrading. The definition insults no person employed in the McJob and to suggest that it does is outrageous. It is more insulting that a corporation would wish to have a definition changed without fundamentally changing the job definition.
In promoting this corporate puff piece, McDonalds have enlisted the BBC ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6683365.stm). This gives the corporation access to a large audience. It is, essentially free advertising. The kind of advertising that costs a lot. The kind of advertising that could be held to demonstrate a meanness of spirit inherent in the creators of McJobs. A term first used in a 1991 book and hiow the term is most commonly used. The attempt bullies people into corporate speak by attempting to rewrite the language.
not a mcemployee
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
cheers
24.05.2007 08:18
Shit science corresponfdent of the year must go to Susan Watts of Newsnight - how did you get your job then eh?.
...see also poverty pimps, charity execs partic housing , guardian writers...
collabarators and lifestylists - this is how it works....
the_middle_class_must_go
Wonder if
24.05.2007 09:16
Jack o
McShite
24.05.2007 15:22
red letter
GenX
24.05.2007 15:38
Also recommend his 'All Families Are Psychotic'.
Danny
Sign the petition or not
24.05.2007 22:23
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/McJobs/
which reads:
We, the undersigned, petition Macdonalds Corporate Entities to congratulate the Oxford English Dictionary for recording the words McJob and McJobs. To immediately cease and desist from employing subcontractors to seek to change a word which is both accurate and commonly used. Finally, to demonstrably transform their business so that people choose to cease using the words McJob and McJobs - beginning with an apology for seeking to change the definition of a word which is common property.
Only name and comments will be displayed.
You must use a unique ip address, unique email address and enter the code mcjob (all lowercase). Unique email addresses and ip are active to ensure the petition is as near one person one vote.
Please be aware that the petition will collect and list email addresses. If you are not happy for your mail address to be collected in this way do not sign the petition. The email addresses will be used for no other purpose than counting the number of persons signing the petition.
Please feel free to tick the "make my signature anonymous" box and untick the "contact me for other campaigns" box.
Ronan McTonalt