Crime of the Century – Article 4


1.Nicholas Sarkozy, newly elected President of France continues to respond in court to our 3 articles released on IndyMedia – Read here  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/05/370993.html
2.We are Allan And Julie Knight, we have been in a legal battle since 1999 to date – we are litigants in person. This case is about non-payment of our work invoices for Vodafone plc. This was a simple commercial case.
3.The information in Article 4 is leverage to support our efforts to gain access to the fruits of our already-awarded judgements.
4.This is an attempt to 'break free' from the injustice we suffer and make the courts honour their judgement, which are totally in our favour, and have been for eight years!
5.Please help us publicise these facts worldwide – copy them to your website, email them to your friends, etc, as Nicholas Sarkozy is trying to block publication.


........21st May 2007 ..... Brussels Criminal Court

6.Nicholas Sarkozy, with a new team of lawyers, was again trying to salvage his political career by arguing about our three indymedia articles published on the 14th, 17th and 18th May saying they were totally untrue. The President of the Brussels court rejected his legal teams argument entirely stating “they were a true account of the events and Lord Justice Clarke's testimony (in the Brussels Criminal Trial)”.
7.The President of the Brussels court issued several orders in response, which were as follows, we have:
1) Unimpeded travel for our barrister and (ourselves) Mr and Mrs Knight
2) No further applications could be made to the court in respect of the case by anybody.
3) Unrestricted access, with protection for us to travel, and our banking to be free and available to us.

(The hearing concluded at this point)

8.After the hearing, our barrister stated:
a) The hearing “went straight down the line”, and that “he got more from the court than he had expected.”
b) He was travelling to the airport to fly to Frankfurt, Germany to the European Clearing Banks Head Office to meet with the vice president and open our banking facility.
note: this is the same facility that should have been available to us, last Friday, the 18th May 2007, according to the vice president of the bank, but that did not happen.

......... 22nd May 2007 .....

9.Our barrister attended the European Clearing Bank with all sealed orders from the Brussels Court which would order the bank to open bank facilities for us. What in fact happened, is the bank said they needed “clarification of the Brussels Court Orders”. (referred to in Crime of the Century, Article 1, Items 15 to 26, 14th May 2007).
10.Our barrister then, by phone, spoke to both The President of the Brussels Court and The President of the Strasbourg Court that if they “didn't stand by, and enforce, their orders, and the bank don't obey this enforcement, (which is contempt of court) then The Knights would publish a damning account of the vacillations of the courts”. After the telephone conversation was over, remarkably, the vice president of the bank appeared stating our banking facility would be available from 9am local time tomorrow (23rd May 2007).

Our Comment:

This vacillation is due to the fact that once we have been paid, and the Brussels judgement has become public, then the effects will be devastating to following institutions: Vodafone Plc would undoubtedly struggle to survive, just as preceding examples such as Enron have shown; The British judicial and political system would be in uproar as 5 principal judges, 2 principals within the Bank of England and 2 New Labour MP's, as well as staff from the Treasury, the Costs Office (within the Royal Courts of Justice), to name but some would be implicated publicly in untenable positions. Further, French officials, including the President himself, would be similarly affected. Many of these individuals have already been found guilty of a variety of charges, the details of which will be released should the aforementioned 'repeat promises' not be fulfilled as promised.

We publish this article to let the world know whom some of the defendants are in the Brussels Criminal Case because we believe that both the Brussels and Strasbourg Court are trying to find a way to deny us our justice and allow the criminals to go free.

If this was allowed to happen it would deny justice and undermine the entire judicial system to every human being on this planet.

Some of the individuals referred to above are:

Of the judges:
Lord Faulkner
Lord Phillips
Lady Hailes (House of Lords)
Lord Justice Clarke
Lord Carnwath

Of the Bank of England:

Mervyn King – Governor
DeLawney Franks


This article is published in the interests of justice and free press.

One Race, One Nation, One Love, One Truth