Put your initial reaction to Annie -- she must be a evil psycopath, perhaps still working for MI5, on one side and give this a listen -- it's actually quite good!

She makes a few mistakes:

* It's Non-Violent Direct Action not "passive resistance" that Gandi advocated (this says a lot about her middle-england background...).

* The plane that hit the Pentagon didn't have to go thought 6 concete walls -- the walls start higher up, at the level it hit after the first wall it was just internal columns till the wall where the small hole was left.

There were some others but these are the two main ones I remember.

There also follows some interesting questions and answers and the two sites that one peson suggests that you look at, Jim Hoffman's (in the audio the guy can't remember his name) are these:

 http://911review.com/
 http://911research.wtc7.net/

These sites, and his one on the 3rd skyscraper to drop, *are* well worth looking at:

 http://wtc7.net/

She accepted litvinenko's story about the apartment buildings blown up being an FSB job as fact and then said, falsely, that the media ignored this accusation litvinenko made when they covered his death. They were all over the place with that, it was the reason they most often cited for litvinenko going into exile. Litvinenko was a spy working for the west, his other noted accusation made against the Russian government was that bin laden and al ciada also worked for the Russian government. That should illuminate how accurate litvinenko's whistle blowing is. That this mi5 annie accepts such rubish as fact tells me she is not really separated from the British secret services, but is in fact in deep cover, still working for them, and using her status as a whistle blower to add credence to their current projects. As litvinenko worked for the western security services and was doing a job for them with that po-210, mi5 annie's job is to use her whistle blowing "dissident" status to steer scruteny away from the western security services in connection to that po-210 smuggling operation.

Whatever was intended for that smuggled po-210, the western security services must be very worried about their role in it getting out. Why else use up someone so well placed in deep cover to support their cover-up?

It was not only Politkovskaya and Litvinenko who believed the Russian security services carried out the bombings of apartment blocks in 2000 which justified that attack.

I personally read reports from our embassy in Moscow which took it very seriously indeed. And highly respected Russia expert David Satter wrote in his book, Darkness At Dawn: ‘Both the logic of the political situation and the weight of the evidence lead overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the Russian leadership itself was responsible for the bombings of the apartment buildings.’