and you Judge Dredd, what would you have done about Iraq and Saddam ?

Sanctions ? Diplomatic Pressure ? Nothing ?

1. Britain could never invade Iraq; we don't have the man power, so your point about what the alternative was is spurious and irrelevant. You could ask the question, why didn't we participate in the Vietnam War? Answer: cos it was a fucking stupid idea and nothing to do with us.

2. The myth of the liberation of Iraq, is things are better but they are demonstrably not so. Show one shred of evidence that Iraq and the Middle East is a more stable and safer place today than it was before the invasion?

3. Like so many lies told by New Labour you are now creating a new revisionist version of history - that the war was about regime change, but that is not what Tony told parliament.

Realist your a New Labour Troll acting as an apologist for imperialism and your racism is revealing - you wouldn't advocate the RAF to drop bombs on Irish 'terrorists' to win the war in Ireland, but have no problem them bombing Iraqi or Afghan 'terrorists' to win the war in those countries. I guess those Iraqis and Afghans must be to wrong colour. That is REALITY.

"and created the conditions to bring about our own 'home-grown' Islamic terrorists."

I assume you're referring to 7/7.

Remember, we still don't know what took place that day, nor who was responsible, since Bliar himself (whose Regime was caught in several blatant LIES in the following weeks) obstructed the investigations, calling them "ludicrous distractions".

Meanwhile, he used this "useful crisis" to seize for himself powers the courts had denied him for four straight years, and plunged deeper into the Neo-Fascist failed policy of military aggression.

Kinda like Bush and 9/11 ...

Will this motherfucker ever face justice?

Sarzosky and Blair are Mossad agents, look at how Blair could have gone before and let Brown take over and save Labour, but no...that means that Cameron will be the next Mossad agent.
See how Gordon tries to soften things and Blair comes up with some stupid sentence regarding terrorism , how he refuses to investigate the fact that MI5 new about the 7/7 bombers...Mossad agents, how he insists in being in the public eye, how he welcomed Sarzosky.
Want to be the next prime minister, news paper editor, journalist, send Mossad an email.
Blair does not work for Britain, he made it quite clear that his claim to success was: 'choose your enemies', he chose Mossad as friends and he got ten years out of it.
Others WILL follow.
The struggle (Jihad), has just begun, Tony goes, Sarzosky comes.
It is a huge problem, sign your soul and priniciples over to Mossad and Zionism and you have the news papers, america and a secret service agent team ready to kill thy opponent.
Who can beat you?
Someone willing to sink to your pitiful levels.
The army of the antichrist...Blair, Bush, Sarzosky, Berlusconi and many more scattered around the globe.
Democracy is dead, it only works to imprison charmin old demented ladies and children with ASBOS.
You call this democracy, jailing two people for leaking a document that exposes the illegal act of bombing a civilian building hosting a media reporting station?
THEY GOT AWAY WITH IT, SO THEY WILL CONTINUE, IT WILL GET WORSE!
PS how can I contact the heroes that have been jailed?

"What would you have done?"

How far are we allowed to go back, Realist?

To Thatcher? In the 70's and 80's I would not have called Saddam a "moderate", or an "ally", or turned a blind eye when he was gassing the Kurds, or invading Iran. I would have tried to undermine, as opposed to prop up and strengthen, Saddam's regime. I would have stopped selling him arms(no matter how little you think they were).

Unlike US Ambassador Gillespie(sp?), I also would not have indicated to Saddam that we had no concerns about his invasion of Kuwait. I would have stressed to Saddam our intolerance of brutal tyrants. Maybe I would have sought UN approval to depose him after Kuwait, who knows?

The 90's? I would have dropped the sanctions that were responsible for a slow genocide against Iraq's civilians, and which also had the effect of strengthening Saddam's grip on power. A hungry and desperate populace are in no position to overthrow a despotic ruler. I would have changed that.

As for the current mess, I would have let the weapons inspectors complete their job, and I would believe them when they said that Iraq was "verifiably disarmed". I would have acted in accordance with International Law at all times.

There are a million and one things that could have been done differently, Realist, but I don't know why I am bothering telling you, as I suspect you are nowt but a troll.

Let me answer this for you – I would have supported democratic movements in Iraq
I would have kept a strict arms embargo – not economic/medical sanctions that killed far more Iraq’s than Sadam managed
If a military attack were needed I would have only attacked military complexes not water treatment plants power plants bridges hospitals etc
I would have not occupied Iraq for 4 years bombing and killing all the people I claimed to be liberating
I would have not tried to hand pick a government that I could control and try to impose my rule on while stealing all the oil
Realist – you don’t give a shit about Iraqi people – you a pointless little arm chair warrior – not in Iraq – the first place I would send you
Oh by the way all the Iraqi people I know including myself (UK -Iraqi) think pepole like you are mindless fools