'Al Qaeda': a figment of the fear- and war-mongering propagandists imagination
Al Qaeda = PNAC, CIA, Mossad, MI6 | 25.04.2007 23:53 | Repression | World
‘AL QAEDA’: A FIGMENT OF THE FEAR- AND WAR-MONGERING PROPAGANDISTS IMAGINATION.
Yesterday the Australian Prime Minister John Howard and his band of fearmongering lunatics warned Australians gathering at Gallipoli for ANZAC Day to be aware of a ‘terrorist threat’. In the UK Guardian today it is reported that the ‘head of Scotland Yard's counterterrorism command said yesterday that al-Qaida had survived the six-year long "war on terror" launched by President George Bush and Tony Blair, and its central leadership had retained the ability to order devastating attacks on Britain.’ As well as Gallipoli that is. And in Iraq, where it seems the Iraqi franchise of ‘al Qaeda’ has claimed responsibility for the deaths yesterday of nine US troops.
So good is the ‘al Qaeda’ franchise business that even the Israelis have tried to set up an ‘al Qaeda’ shop in Palestine. Unfortunately the locals soon discovered that the business wasn’t genuine (apparently Mossad hadn’t paid bin Laden the franchise fee) so the business was quickly shut down.
Of course al Qaeda exists, or at least existed, (indeed, it was set up with the assistance of the CIA as part of their covert war against the Soviets in Afghanistan before the Taliban took over there) but it doesn’t exist in the way that the western neocon-dominated press would have us believe. Despite the continued references to ‘al Qaeda’ everyday as we are told that they are responsible for every conceivable atrocity that occurs on our planet, there has not been any evidence whatsoever that ‘al Qaeda’ per se has ever been responsible for anything beyond the borders of Afghanistan and the remoter parts of Pakistan.
The western propagandists have presented to the world a picture of an ‘al Qaeda’ as being a massive and extremely well disciplined international organisation that has branches everywhere. Yet nowhere is there any prima facie evidence to suggest that they even exist, let alone in such an organised and disciplined way. As the piece in today’s UK Guardian demonstrates, we are expected to simply believe what we are told with the total lack of evidence being conveniently explained away as; ‘for security reasons we can’t divulge the source’.
In Iraq the US and their allies are currently busy trying to wedge the Sunni and Shi’ite factions by blaming ‘al Qaeda’ for the friction between the two groupings. This is nothing new; they’ve tried it before, but now they are putting more effort into their blame game because they see it as away of polarising the rest of Islam in the Middle East and beyond thus diverting attention away from the Israelis and their efforts to subdue Palestine, Hamas and Hizbollah but, at the same time, demonising further an Iran that has a predominately Shiite population (as against the rest of the Islamic world which is around 80% Sunni).
The problem for the US, Israel, and their western allies, is that all this propaganda is for consumption in the west only. The Middle Eastern peoples, Sunni or Shia, are very much aware that their relationships with each other are quite secure and have been for decades. For them the myth of ‘al Qaeda’ remains just that – a myth, and that the struggles that exist between various Sunni and Shiite groups in Iraq are mainly a combination of political and criminal secular differences in a post-Saddam lawless era and that such violence, as bloody as it often is, is contained within Iraq and has nothing to do with the battles that Islamic peoples and Arabs generally are fighting against Israeli right-wing Zionism in Palestine and US hegemonic colonialism in the Middle East and Central Asia.
‘Al Qaeda’ remains, as it has since the US decided that they were to blame for the events of 9/11, a myth that exists solely to perpetuate fear and the illusion that there is always an enemy to justify the continued ‘Global War on Terrorism’.
http://lataan.blogspot.com/2007/04/al-qaeda-figment-of-fear-and-war.html
As Bliar Scandal Looms, Gov't Cries "Al Qaeda"
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/04/368540.html
Yesterday the Australian Prime Minister John Howard and his band of fearmongering lunatics warned Australians gathering at Gallipoli for ANZAC Day to be aware of a ‘terrorist threat’. In the UK Guardian today it is reported that the ‘head of Scotland Yard's counterterrorism command said yesterday that al-Qaida had survived the six-year long "war on terror" launched by President George Bush and Tony Blair, and its central leadership had retained the ability to order devastating attacks on Britain.’ As well as Gallipoli that is. And in Iraq, where it seems the Iraqi franchise of ‘al Qaeda’ has claimed responsibility for the deaths yesterday of nine US troops.
So good is the ‘al Qaeda’ franchise business that even the Israelis have tried to set up an ‘al Qaeda’ shop in Palestine. Unfortunately the locals soon discovered that the business wasn’t genuine (apparently Mossad hadn’t paid bin Laden the franchise fee) so the business was quickly shut down.
Of course al Qaeda exists, or at least existed, (indeed, it was set up with the assistance of the CIA as part of their covert war against the Soviets in Afghanistan before the Taliban took over there) but it doesn’t exist in the way that the western neocon-dominated press would have us believe. Despite the continued references to ‘al Qaeda’ everyday as we are told that they are responsible for every conceivable atrocity that occurs on our planet, there has not been any evidence whatsoever that ‘al Qaeda’ per se has ever been responsible for anything beyond the borders of Afghanistan and the remoter parts of Pakistan.
The western propagandists have presented to the world a picture of an ‘al Qaeda’ as being a massive and extremely well disciplined international organisation that has branches everywhere. Yet nowhere is there any prima facie evidence to suggest that they even exist, let alone in such an organised and disciplined way. As the piece in today’s UK Guardian demonstrates, we are expected to simply believe what we are told with the total lack of evidence being conveniently explained away as; ‘for security reasons we can’t divulge the source’.
In Iraq the US and their allies are currently busy trying to wedge the Sunni and Shi’ite factions by blaming ‘al Qaeda’ for the friction between the two groupings. This is nothing new; they’ve tried it before, but now they are putting more effort into their blame game because they see it as away of polarising the rest of Islam in the Middle East and beyond thus diverting attention away from the Israelis and their efforts to subdue Palestine, Hamas and Hizbollah but, at the same time, demonising further an Iran that has a predominately Shiite population (as against the rest of the Islamic world which is around 80% Sunni).
The problem for the US, Israel, and their western allies, is that all this propaganda is for consumption in the west only. The Middle Eastern peoples, Sunni or Shia, are very much aware that their relationships with each other are quite secure and have been for decades. For them the myth of ‘al Qaeda’ remains just that – a myth, and that the struggles that exist between various Sunni and Shiite groups in Iraq are mainly a combination of political and criminal secular differences in a post-Saddam lawless era and that such violence, as bloody as it often is, is contained within Iraq and has nothing to do with the battles that Islamic peoples and Arabs generally are fighting against Israeli right-wing Zionism in Palestine and US hegemonic colonialism in the Middle East and Central Asia.
‘Al Qaeda’ remains, as it has since the US decided that they were to blame for the events of 9/11, a myth that exists solely to perpetuate fear and the illusion that there is always an enemy to justify the continued ‘Global War on Terrorism’.
http://lataan.blogspot.com/2007/04/al-qaeda-figment-of-fear-and-war.html
As Bliar Scandal Looms, Gov't Cries "Al Qaeda"
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/04/368540.html
Al Qaeda = PNAC, CIA, Mossad, MI6
Comments
Hide 5 hidden comments or hide all comments
Another Jordan Thornton load of crap
26.04.2007 07:25
Funding for the website a bit down this month Jordan ?
not fooled
No
26.04.2007 08:27
It is obviously not news, it is little more than a bunch of cut and pastes cobbled together to try and pretend there is a story that clearly does not exist.
Jordan for whatever reason sees Mossad and he CIA behind every world event and his website has an anti Jewish tinge that bothers me. For all the above reasons he should be hidden but he is not and in some cases is even promoted. I am unable to understand why.
thanks
not fooled by not fooled
26.04.2007 08:30
and if you don't know or are unaware of the origins of al-cia-duh, then please get up to speed before your next contribution
or do you have an axe to grind - an indefencible position to defend?
hegal
strauss
false flag
through deciet we wage war
clash of civilizations
divide and conquer
not fooled at all
Still not fooled even if you are.
26.04.2007 09:05
If you want to sit back and think that 9/11. the Madrid bombings, and all the rest are the result of some sort of CIA, Mossad, (insert your favourite bogeyman here) set up then go for it and good luck to you. If however you want to spend the time in real analysis of why a proud and respected faith has been hijacked by a small goup to justify a wish to see suppression of among others Women, Gay Men, Lesbian, Christians, Jews, Communists, Black Africans, and furthermore is prepared to enforce that through mass murder then I will be happy to provide information.
There has been much talk here on Indymedia of a smear campaign against Thornton instead of analysing why this man does what he does and the damage that is done by his spamming of not only Indymedia but other websites around the world.
Regretfully there are those within the Indymedia world who are quite happy to turn a blind eye to the ravings of obvious nutcases just as long as they bash Jews under the pretence of Israel and Zionism and that is EXACTLY what has gone on here.
Al Quida represents a threat. A threat to Islam, a threat to Social Justice and a threat to Peace in the Middle East. In is NOT a creation of the CIA, of Mossad, of NeoCons. It is a creation of a small group of fanatical Islamists who wish to control Saudi oil and use it to fund a camapign of imposing their peverted brand of Islam throughout the world.
Thornton is wrong and your support for him is misguided.
not fooled
Hidden comments
26.04.2007 10:04
Indymedia moderators, you are so predictable sometimes !
The Who
Denial & ZOG
26.04.2007 11:06
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/blackmail.html
"Wahrheit" macht dumm!
Multiple definitions
26.04.2007 12:13
Several UK journalists have gone to great lengths to point out that Al Qaeda needs to be discussed as having several different interpretations, rather than seen as one enormous all-powerful organisation as it is often represented in the US press. There is a tiny core established by Osama Bin Laden; organisations that were directly linked to it and worked with it (though they may not have referred to themselves as Al Qaeda); those who've expressed a vague allegiance to it, though been entirely independent; and those with no direct connection whatsoever who have found it a useful brand or banner. And there's also those who would not describe themselves as Al Quaida but end up getting labelled it because they appear to have the same aims.
Jason Burke of the Observer has written about this repeatedly and produced a good book on the subject.
Norville B
Hide 5 hidden comments or hide all comments