Skip to content or view screen version

SOCPA "organisers" in court this week

press release | 09.04.2007 16:30 | SOCPA | Repression | London

maya evans became the first person to be convicted for holding an unauthorised demonstration under the SOCPA laws introduced in august 2005. milan rai was the first conviction as an organiser.
their 'demo' was reading out names of british and iraqi people killed in the war. since then, they helped organise a further demonstration highlighting the massacre of civilians in fallujah. for this 'offence', they are in court tomorrow.

Peace activists Maya Anne Evans 27 and Milan Rai 41 from Hastings are
back in Court on the 10 April 2pm Horseferry Magistrates facing charges
under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act for peacefully
demonstrating against the Iraq war in October 2006 opposite Downing
Street and Parliament.

Maya Anne Evans became the first person convicted under the Serious
Organised Crime and Police Act in 2005 when she peacefully read the
names of British soldiers who had lost their lives in the Iraq war (1).
She now has a criminal record and is about to be repossessed by the
bailiffs for refusing to pay the fine(2).

Milan Rai was the first person convicted for organising the unauthorised
demonstration the two attended in 2005, he was reading out some of the
100,000 names of Iraqis(3) who have been killed by US/UK forces since
the invasion March 2003.

Maya and Mil now face charges for organising and participating in a 24
hour peace camp which took place last October to mark the anniversary of
the massive US assault on Fallujah in November 2004(4) and the Lancet
Medical report(5).

Although the only ones charged Mil and Maya were not the sole
organisers. At the forth coming trial the two will be representing
themselves and calling the other 8 organizers to give evidence.

Maya says: "I am not going to co-operate with the erosion of our freedom
of speech. It is my democratic right to freely remember and respect the
deaths of the war dead."

If convicted of organising an unauthorised demonstration the two could
face a possible 51 weeks in prison or a hefty fine.

Maya adds: "It's outrageous the government are using such draconian
tactics to silence anti war protest. Peaceful demonstration should not
be illegal."

CONTACT
mayaevans at fastmail.co.uk
milanrai at btinternet.com

OTHER NOTES
1.At the time Maya read 97 names, the figure now stands at 134 UK
soldiers killed in Iraq
2.Maya has recently published a book 'Naming the Dead' available on
www.j-n-v.org
3. In October 2004 a medial journal The Lancet published a report
estimating 100,000 Iraqis had died due to the invasion of US/UK troops
into Iraq.
4. In November 2004 the US - with British assistance - launched a
massive assault against the Iraqi city of Fallujah, killing hundreds of
civilians, forcing tens of thousands of people to flee their homes and
using white phosphorus - a substance that burns down to the bone - as a
weapon against the city and its inhabitants. Since then US-led forces
have continued to attack towns and cities across Iraq, and played a
major role in pushing the country into a state of civil war.
5. According to the latest survey published in the Lancet October 2006,
coalition forces in Iraq have killed 186,000 Iraqis since the start of
the 2003 invasion ( http://tinyurl.com/y98ksu). The CIA says that the
occupation of Iraq has become "the 'cause celebre' for jihadists ...
cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement"
( http://tinyurl.com/s45se) and the head of the British Army has said
that the presence of British forces in Iraq is "exacerbat[ing] the
security problems" there (Daily Mail, 13 October).


report on 'no more fallujahs' event at  http://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/10/354676.html
full socpa coverage at  http://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358676.html

press release

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

655,000

10.04.2007 20:25

'According to the latest survey published in the Lancet October 2006, coalition forces in Iraq have killed 186,000 Iraqis since the start of the 2003 invasion'

That report estimated 655,000 excess deaths as a consequence of the war. Yes - that is 6 5 5 , 0 0 0 bloody deaths and that is the reason for demonstrating against the war.

Brian B
- Homepage: http://www.brianb.uklinux.net/antiwar-discuss/


The two Lancet figures (655,000 and 186,000)

11.04.2007 21:13

Brian B is confusing two different things here. The 2006 Lancet survey concluded that there had been 655,000 excess deaths in Iraq since the 2003 invasion *and* that 31% of all violent deaths (that is, 186,000 deaths) were directly attributed to "coalition" forces.

Clearly, the US and British governments bear a heavy responsibility for *all* of the deaths that have occurred in Iraq as a consequence of the invasion and occupation, but this 186,000 estimate should be much more widely used and known as it gives some idea of the scale of the killing for which US/UK forces are *directly* responsible (and I suspect that many people in the US/UK believe, wrongly, that almost all violent deaths in Iraq are the result of sectarian violence, suicide bombings etc...).

Gabriel Carlyle
- Homepage: http://www.voicesuk.org


The two Lancet figures

13.05.2007 10:29

Actually I am not at all confused and do not see why you would want to portray me in that way. I have seen a copy of the Lancet report and have read it. I think both figures are important in their own way. However I believe that we need to see the indirect effects of the war as well, especially if it is likely that those deaths would not have occurred without the war being launched. People in peace/anti-war groups know the destabilising effects of war and should warn about those as well. It is exactly the reason for campaigning against unprovoked attacks on other nations.

Brian B
- Homepage: http://www.brianb.uklinux.net/antiwar-discuss/