Skip to content or view screen version

Tin Pot Nazis in Dewsbury

Kirklees Unity | 12.03.2007 13:00 | Anti-racism | Migration | Other Press

The Tin Pot "The British Peoples Party" have shown their ugly faces in Dewsbury

KU have noticed the Tin Pot "The British Peoples Party" have shown their ugly faces in Dewsbury.


Bright orange (I kid you not) BPP stickers have popped up on the odd lampost etc.


It has been a while since the last time rubbish like this appeared in Dewsbury.


Then it was the handywork of the equally idiotic "The White Nationalist Party"


These are the same silly buggers just with a different name.
In fact they have a name change about every 6 weeks.
The BPP and their ilk are so barmy even the BNP don't want them.

Kirklees Unity
- e-mail: kirkleesunity@yahoo.co.uk
- Homepage: http://kirkunity.blogspot.com/

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Well rip the stickers off then ....

12.03.2007 18:49


Well you say some Nazi / BPP stickers have gone up in the area, well rip them off and put up some fashwatch stickers, pretty simple a !

Sheffield city centre are covered in fashwatch stickers, especially near the councils howden house and the so called housing office.

Mirage Warrior
- Homepage: http://fashwatch.org


These toilets...

13.03.2007 13:10

...can't show their faces in Leeds any more after their organisation was smashed by militant anti-fascists.

If they start coming out of the wood work again they know what will happen.

Rudeboyo


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Need some round-the-clock security we see

14.03.2007 09:09

1.1. Re: Bad locking up again.

Posted by: "Mark Barnsley"  markbarnsley@mail.com

Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:49 am

I don't understand why this comes up time and time again, but for slightly different reasons. If people leave the lights on and the building unlocked why are they then allowed to use it again?

----- Original Message -----

From: Bob

To: Mark Barnsley

Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 2:54 PM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Is this list of several hundred people really the place to hand out bollockings? I really feel strongly that pointing the finger is counter productive, when it doesn't take that much longer just to find out who put the event on and let them know directly. People put loads of effort into putting on events, and granted some stuff isn't done, but it's not very nice to do a public name and shame.

Just my 2p anyway.

bob xx

On 2/20/07, Mark Barnsley wrote:

Sorry Dave, I meant who had the Common Place. Also meant to send my reply to the list!

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave To: Mark Barnsley

Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:40 AM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Mark, who had what?

Dave ----- Original Message -----

From: Mark Barnsley

To: Dave Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:37 AM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Who had it?

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave

To: ; tash gordon

Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:29 AM

Subject: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Sunday evening - place not locked up correctly again. lights left on 1st and 2nd floors, coffee machine left on, locks not put on front door

1.2. Re: Bad locking up again. Posted by: "Mark Barnsley"  markbarnsley@mail.com Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:49 am I really don't see what is wrong with saying who left the building unlocked or which group left the place like a pig-sty (for example.) Do we really think that someone is going to start blubbing about it? I'm more concerned about the people who then have to clean up after them. I find Bob's position bizarre.

Mark

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave

To: Commonplace

Cc: Bob Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 9:37 AM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Bob,

Are you going to take on the role of letting who ever is responsible for the event know what they have done wrong and make sure they do it right next time? People learn by their mistakes being found out not to make the same mistake or they should!

I agree with the principle that the people who are 'trashing' the environment have names and they should be publicised so under the same principle I see nothing wrong in publicising who is 'trashing' the Commonplace. Up to now I haven't named & shamed but I may get pissed off enough to do it.

I found one of the locks from a front fire door outside on the windowsill at the rear fire door on Saturday afternoon. OK a new lock was in it's place with its key just left on the counter in the cafe. Do you want to find out why?

I got called out at 2.30 in the morning a month or two ago to lock the place up, will you take on the role to make sure it doesn't happen again?

Dave

----- Original Message -----

From: Bob

To: Mark Barnsley

Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 2:54 PM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Is this list of several hundred people really the place to hand out bollockings? I really feel strongly that pointing the finger is counter productive, when it doesn't take that much longer just to find out who put the event on and let them know directly. People put loads of effort into putting on events, and granted some stuff isn't done, but it's not very nice to do a public name and shame.

Just my 2p anyway.

bob xx

On 2/20/07, Mark Barnsley wrote:

Sorry Dave, I meant who had the Common Place. Also meant to send my reply to the list!

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave To: Mark Barnsley

Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:40 AM

Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Mark, who had what?

Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Barnsley To: Dave Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Who had it?

----- Original Message -----

From: Dave To: ; tash gordon

Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 10:29 AM

Subject: [leedssocialcentre] Bad locking up again.

Sunday evening - place not locked up correctly again. lights left on 1st and 2nd floors, coffee machine left on, locks not put on front fire doors.

Redwatch Security Team


RW Security Team, an oxymoron.

14.03.2007 10:29

Listen princess, registering to a public mailing list hardly puts you in the same league as Mossad.

Now Fuck Off!!!!

F.C.E


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments