Skip to content or view screen version

C4's Global Warming Swindle

Digery Cohen | 09.03.2007 18:28

I need to know.

The C4 programme said that the carbon dioxide level rose after a rise in the heat from the sun and not the other way around as Al Gore says.

Is this true?

Anyone know?

Thanks.

Digery Cohen
- e-mail: digerycohen@yahoo.co.uk

Additions

Durkin again!

10.03.2007 11:09

"The decision to commission this programme seems even odder when you discover who is making it. In 1997, the director, Martin Durkin, produced a very similar series for Channel 4 called “Against Nature”, which also maintained that global warming was a scam dreamt up by environmentalists. It was riddled with hilarious scientific howlers. More damagingly, the only way in which Durkin could sustain his thesis was to deceive the people he interviewed and to edit their answers to change their meaning. Following complaints by his interviewees, the Independent Television Commission found that “the views of the four complainants, as made clear to the interviewer, had been distorted by selective editing” and that they had been “misled as to the content and purpose of the programmes when they agreed to take part.”(14) Channel 4 was obliged to broadcast one of the most humiliating primetime apologies it has ever made. Are institutional memories really so short?"

 http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/01/30/another-species-of-denial/

"In October 1998 a television producer named Martin Durkin took a proposal to the BBC’s science series, Horizon. Silicone breast implants, he claimed, far from harming women, were in fact beneficial, reducing the risk of breast cancer. Horizon commissioned a researcher to find out whether or not his assertion was true. After a thorough review, the researcher reported that Mr Durkin had ignored a powerful body of evidence contradicting his claims. Martin Durkin withdrew his proposal. Instead of dropping it, however, he took it to Channel 4 and, astonishingly, sold it to their science series, Equinox.

...On Monday, Channel 4 will broadcast a 90-minute Equinox programme about genetic engineering, made by Martin Durkin and called, appropriately enough, “Modified Truth”. Already it appears that the programme-making has suffered from Mr Durkin’s characteristic approach. “I feel completely betrayed and misled”, reports Dr Mae-Wan Ho, a geneticist Durkin interviewed. “They did not tell me it was going to be an attack on my position.”

 http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2000/03/16/modified-truth/
.

viewer


Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

c4

09.03.2007 19:56

was the documentary made by the old rcp/living marxism crew by any chance ?

concerned of gipton


that cunt martin durkin made it

09.03.2007 20:53

he's well in bed with the revolutionary communist party wankers. i/we would all love to know just how he gets a job with ch4 AGAIN when the other program he made for them caused the channel to have to make a grovelling program about how it was a pack of lies.
 http://www.climatedenial.org/

sid
- Homepage: http://www.climatedenial.org/


thoughtful

12.03.2007 13:47

nice to see we're getting some thoughtful responses here; really attempting to deal with the science of the issue, i don't think.

comments like this do the environmental movement a disservice.

munkle
mail e-mail: munkle55@gmail.com


What about the others?

13.03.2007 12:02

But there are lots of Scientists who aren't involved in the programme who hold similar beliefs...

Dave


Communism?

13.03.2007 16:04

Why are you suggesting the film maker is a communist?

A large portion of the programme was given over to blaming the furore amongst the public on “homeless” communists who flocked to the environmentalist banner in the 1980’s as a means of remaining politically active in opposition of capitalism and globalisation.

If anything, the programme maker should be branded as a capitalist/globalist.

Politicizing this in any way (particularly when you're confused about what communism is) isn't very helpful. This should be a scientific problem with scientific solutions.

T-Style


The RCP...

13.03.2007 22:15

The comment above is clearly from someone who hasn't been active on the left in the UK for the last 25 years... and fair enough, it's good that there are some new people here...!

If you had been you would know who the RCP (Revolutionary Communist Party:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Communist_Party_%28Furedi%29 ) were (and of course I don't mean the original RCP, Jock Haston etc:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Communist_Party_%281944-1949%29 ), and their stance on rather crucial issues like the miners strike -- "they should have held a ballot". Or the manner in which they tried to recruit -- going up to people on main shopping streets and saying things like "are you a racist?". Or their ghastly magazine, Living Marxism... Oh what memories...

When the RCP fell apart some of their supporters went on to become pro-capitalists -- this is a path not unique to the RCP, ex-members of the SWP like Christopher Hitchens (  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens ) and further back Max Shachtman (  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Shachtman ) have gone down this path before...

This is clearly the path that the writer and director of this TV show has gone down...

Veteran


Does CO2 lag or lead global warming?

14.03.2007 01:30

I'm interested to, has anyone got a scientific response to the question please?
(or are inconvenient truths denied on this forum?)

cleandrinkingwater