Skip to content or view screen version

SOCPA - The garrotting of commonsense and democracy continues

Netcu Watch | 07.03.2007 15:45 | Animal Liberation | Repression

Three activists have been sent to prison for a total of 7 years and nine months. Mark Taylor got 4 years, Suzanne Taylor, 2½ years, and Teresa Portwine received 15 months under SOCPA.

Beagle punching at HLS
Beagle punching at HLS


Their “crime” was to demonstrate against companies associated with Huntingdon Life Sciences and from what I can see this amounted to at the very worst an office occupation something many of us have done before leaving the premises and handing out leaflets.

Activists occupied Shell garages after the murder of Ken Saro Wiwa, environmentalists, human rights and peace activists have also used this tactic but merely because the premises were associated with vivisection a crime is deemed to have been committed. Methinks that it will not be too long before this disgusting attack on liberty extends to activists protesting about other matters!

Predictably the press have commended the incarceration of 3 decent people and Mr Justice Goldring commented that people have the right to work unhindered. The Trade and Industry Secretary Mr Alistair Darling’s diatribe against the 3 included something about HLS workers doing “life saving medical research”. What fascinates me is the fact that the government, police and courts cannot actually be bothered to protect people who actually do save lives - those who work in the NHS.

Panorama recently reported that 1 health worker is assaulted EVERY 7 minutes (as opposed to being “harassed” or mildly annoyed). A nurse interviewed was attacked with a needle leaving her with permanent nerve damage, the CPS decided that it was not in the public interest to prosecute. A doctor was kicked in the head and his assailant was given a suspended sentence and a £500 fine. Clearly Mr Darling believes that people who torture animals to test a new food colouring are much more important than people who actually save lives.

NHS workers are almost expected to be routinely verbally abused, punched and kicked as do many public workers none of whom have the right to “work unhindered”. What an interesting set of priorities?

Strange thing is if we invent a hypothetical scenario with a person who works within the NHS and also does animal experiments who finds that his laboratory has protestors outside the entrance he will get more police protection by saying he feels harassed than if he is beaten to a pulp whilst he walks the hospital corridors.

The icing on the cake of this disgraceful sentencing and brown nosing with the multinationals is the sentence on the same day of a low-life called Steven Chapman.

He was peeing up the side of a supermarket when 78 year old Benjamin Kerr, an Alzeimers sufferer, remonstrated with him. Chapman probably bored of abusing animals at the livestock market where he worked attacked Mr Kerr leaving him on the ground. This scum then stole alcohol stepping over Mr Kerr on his way out. Mr Kerr shortly died from the injuries inflicted.

Apparently killing someone is of far less import than potentially upsetting a companies profit Chapman got 2 years in prison half that of Mark Taylor. This is the sort of society the government has created. It is OK to kill but not to protest!

Mocking the families of murder victims

Let's compare the sentences handed down yesterday to non-violent animal activists Mark , Suzanne and Teresa with those of convicted murderers in the UK.

As you will see, Mark's four year sentence for allegedly putting people off their work who are involved in the torture of animals far surpasses the sentences handed down to those that have committed the most brutal of murders.

Yesterday's sentencing was just another example of the lengths that the capitalist system will go to in a bid to protect the huge profits derived from the torture of animals in laboratories.

* A top policeman has spoken of his shock at the sentence given to a 16-year-old who knifed and killed a schoolboy in a Shirley park. Detective Inspector Neil Cochlin who led the investigation into the manslaughter of 17-year-old Gavin Brown, said he could understand the "anger and upset" his family felt at the killer's three year jail sentence.


* A 22-year-old man has been sentenced to a minimum of two years in jail for killing a pensioner who challenged him about urinating in the street.


* A Pontypool sales executive who killed another driver in a head-on collision, just two minutes after sending a text message, has been jailed for two years.


* A County Limerick man has been sentenced to 3 years in prison for his part in a motorcycle crash in which his brother lost his life.


* In 1991 Joseph McGrail was tried in Birmingham for the murder of his wife. He pleaded provocation on the basis that his wife was an alcoholic and swore at him. He killed her by repeatedly kicking her in the stomach. At the trial the judge commented ….."this lady would have tried the patience of a saint", he gave him a two year suspended sentence.


* In 1995 Brian Steadman was jailed for three years after he hit his wife 13 times with a hammer, he pleaded diminished responsibility due the his wife's constant nagging.


* In 1997 Joseph Swinburne killed his wife by stabbing her eleven times when she told him she was leaving him for another man. He was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 200 hours community service.


* In 1992 Judge Dennison gave Bisla Rajinder Singh, an 18 month sentence suspended for one year for the manslaughter of his wife on the grounds of provocation. The judge told him "you have suffered through no fault of your own….your wife was a domineering lady with a sharp and persistent tongue".


* Lucy Kellet was preparing to leave Oliver Kellet after years of abuse. As she as waiting for the removal van to take her to her new home he stabbed her repeatedly with a bowie knife. He pleaded manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and was given 3 year probation.



To support the three shac prisoners please see  http://www.shac.net/ARCHIVES/2007/March/7a.html

Netcu Watch
- Homepage: http://www.vivisection.info/netcu_watch/

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

The sentences are a bit heavy..but

07.03.2007 17:18

To argue for example that a guy who "killed" his brother in a motorcycle accident is treated lightly for getting 3 years is a bit stupid dont you think?
These people were also a bit naive being caught on camera on numerous occasions ( some filmed by themselves ) making it easier for them to be made an example of and flashed all over the news channels to stave off criticism from mr and mrs moderate.
Snippets of long gone sentences is a tactic used by the mass media when we have a few ratboys , kiddy fiddlers , hoodies or shootings to sort out , and usually a load of bollocks anyway , if you look a little deeper.
If i were to ask you why all the examples above are men , and mainly men attacking women , you would probably accuse me of being something or other , and hopefully that I'm not aiding the main objective/agument.
Think about it.

daggle


also

07.03.2007 17:23

John Haase a Liverpool gangster got 18 years for drugs and arranged for his contacts to plant guns then told the cops were to find them.Micheal Howard gave him a pardon after 11 months.His co-accused just happend to be dear old Micks Uncle.

whouknow


join the dots

07.03.2007 17:49

The examples in the post of the 'lenient' (!!) sentences that have been handed out in the UK for causing loss of life (intentional or otherwise) are designed to make the reader question why did someone get more time in prison for supposedly causing loss of business to a few companies involved with animal testing as opposed to those who have killed other human beings? Simple eh?

Dot


Reality bites - Taylor did more than drive...

10.03.2007 18:20

During three months over the summer of 2005, workers were terrified as animal rights protesters, led by Taylor, invaded their offices shouting "murderers" and other insults, the Old Bailey criminal court heard [Cherwell24]

The activists caused thousands of pounds worth of damage in their campaign to put Huntingdon Life Sciences out of business. [Scotsman]

All of the defendants were involved, to a greater or lesser extent ... in deliberate intimidation of innocent members of the public at their places of work [Scotsman]

===

Frankly, if someone did this to me - I'd probably respond with common assault, so they are lucky to have got banged up before someone did knock them about. Everybody is part of a cog in the system, and violence and intimidation isn't going to change things, but just cause more suffering in reaction. What about the fishermen who catch the tuna that goes in the sandwich that is bought by Company X - how far away from the issues can animal rightsists stray. One thing is certain - violence kills discussion, and we change things through vocal debate.

It's a good thing there's been debate on animal testing - I believe that the violent minority has damaged prospects of tightening legislation by making it hard for moderates to come out in support of tightening the legislation. The glorification of violence and harassment in "Biteback" has probably led to more animal testing because it has delayed the introduction of the next round of legislation, it has polarised the debate, it has shut down communication.

NOBODY likes sacrificing animals, and moderate scientists will probably feel at the moment that with the threat of violence from ALF, they can not speak out in favour of further tightening of legislation even in the face of increased alternative technology in genomics etc etc. Its in everyone's best interests, and in the interests of reducing the number of animals used in experiments, if the moderate part of the animal rights movement works closely with scientists to work out how to move things forward more quickly, and that means a truce.

I happen to believe that also means relaxing some aspects of legislation used to control demonstrations, but again that might only happen once the violence and intimidation stops. It looks like it has worked for the IRA in Northern Ireland, peace is a real vote winner.

An afterthough relating to Indymedia's constitution: Now that SPEAK is going the election route, I presume they will no longer qualify to post to Indymedia under the rules ("not a mouthpiece for political parties which are part of the electoral process" etc. etc.)

Guardian reader


Violence??

10.03.2007 22:16

"Guardian reader"

First your ilk whine and squeal about a car being repainted as being an act of 'violence' then you whine and squeal some more about someone who deliberately tortures and kills animals for a wage packet being (rightfully) called a fucking 'murderer' (which they are) and again call it violence. For fucks sake, Grow up.

Violence is Iraq, is Afghanistan, is war, is burnt out corpses on the battlefield who have suffered under the hand of government's that you support.

"Bite back"? Violence my ass.

Another Lifer Forever


Stupidity....

10.03.2007 22:26

'Guardian reader' wrote:

"Frankly, if someone did this to me - I'd probably respond with common assault, so they are lucky to have got banged up before someone did knock them about. Everybody is part of a cog in the system, and violence and intimidation isn't going to change things, but just cause more suffering in reaction"

Message received loud and clear. You can smack people who shout. But violence just causes suffering.....

Twat!

Occupational Hazard


Guardian Reader

18.03.2007 23:16

No mistake about it pal, you're a bloody plank. Let me guess, you're 22 years old and know the big bad world so well you're an authority on everything.

A few points:

"Frankly, if someone did this to me - I'd probably respond with common assault, so they are lucky to have got banged up before someone did knock them about."

Yeah right you would. You'd probably all start apologising before sulking off to your computer to beratte people from behind it. Yeah, right, we all know not to start fights with you now, don't we? Virgin.

"What about the fishermen who catch the tuna that goes in the sandwich that is bought by Company X - how far away from the issues can animal rightsists stray"

You're banging on about tuna fishermen in comparrison to this court case then asking about activists straying from "the issues." What planet are you on? You don't see the glaring contradiction dribberling out of your mouth? You wouldn't know the issues if they introduced themselves to you. Again you go on contradicting yourself bleeting on about all the AR "violence" (which isn't really that violent is it?), then arguing it kills discussion before stating "It's a good thing there's been debate on animal testing"

And for the record, screw the fishermen too.

Anyway, I don't have the enthuasiasm or the effort to go in bit by bit on your post, because it's all waffle. - that's how much contempt that I have for people like you, that I can't even be bothered to try and reason with you, It's all the same pharmacuetical vivisection-apologising nonsense your lot have been banging on about for years. I bet you felt so smug with your little trying-to-be reasonable post but we all know it's waffle. Bang on about this tiny minority all you want - but have a good look at the people's petitions and relevant MORI studies why don't you.

"NOBODY likes sacrifycing animals"... lunacy... do you know what a fox hunt is?

Another Lifer is spot on - grow up man, finish your university module and go work in the real world.

Choose your side of the fence and history will judge you. It always looks kindly on people like us.

Roger


plank

18.03.2007 23:20

"if the moderate part of the animal rights movement works closely with scientists to work out how to move things forward more quickly, and that means a truce.if the moderate part of the animal rights movement works closely with scientists to work out how to move things forward more quickly, and that means a truce."

When you're offering yourself up to be cut open and poisoned, gassed or burnt and it's your neck on the line then we'll compromise, deal?

It's put a real smile on my face to see some sniverlling apologist for vivisection all wanting to call a truce. Get out of the kitchen.

duncan