Skip to content or view screen version

BBC Reported WTC-7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell

V. | 28.02.2007 05:23 | Analysis | Repression | Terror War | World

An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.






An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.

This amazing clip was on Google Video, but was removed within hours of the story breaking. However, hundreds of people had already managed to download the clip and it has gone viral on the Internet and the censors won't be able to shut the lid this time. A You Tube upload is available but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at  http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096&c=1 and also at  http://stage6.divx.com/content/show/1133782?user_id=245557.

To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark.

Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.

The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

As we have documented before, firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building's collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates.

Here are some further screenshots from the video.

V.
- Homepage: http://www.911blogger.com/node/6482

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

does that

28.02.2007 12:23

mean youtube is part of the conspricy?

so


this is a red-herring

28.02.2007 17:34

This is misinformation - a decoy to discredit people from the fact that Building 7 did indeed collapse and that for it to collapse, explosives would have to have been laid into each floor, which would have taken several days if not weeks to prepare as it takes for any building prepared for controlled demolition.


Bullshit-Detector


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

who is the mole inside Indymedia UK?

28.02.2007 17:43

interesting, also, that previous 2 reports of this story with numerous comments have been removed, and the story reposted! Who is the mole inside Indymedia?

Bullshit-Detector


right - pull the other one (leg - not building!)

28.02.2007 19:56

Right - a red herring?

OK - so howabout you tell us all what actually happened and this wonderful time-lapse issue and now how the BBC claim to have "lost" the tapes. Or is that all red herring conspiraloon nonsense too?

double vee


Or possibly

28.02.2007 20:25

They knew the building was going to collapse because it was on fire and in the confusion that surrounded the defining event of our generation the statement "It's about to collapse" was mis-broadcast as "It has collapsed".

.


It all makes sense

28.02.2007 21:23

Jane Standley is obviously a lizard.

Lizard king


don't read this stuff!

28.02.2007 21:32

There was just a problem with the slow time to real time transition and the reporter was live but behind a recorded screen. the video was actually made by the BBC three years before the digital signal got lost at GCHQ. Anyways the reporter is not real she is just a hologram made from H5N1. it was the A-rab oil that blew up the building. I was at school blowing a goat.so just shut up limey peasents and wait to be eugenically processed. work hard live longer.

everyone knows we done it but what ya gonna do about it?

Prepare the bio weapons - Dick the masses are SOFT.

Quick look over there.

george w
mail e-mail: foolin.mostpeople@all-of-the-time.gov
- Homepage: http://nothin- to-see-here.gov.


confucious say ...

28.02.2007 21:34

Confucious say:

"go watch the footage for yourself, and after watching it see if you can repeat that comment with a straight face"

confucious


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments