VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE
BRIAN | 27.02.2007 06:25
Must see video...BBC reports tell of collapse of WTC7 half an hour before it fell.
The question is are the times given accurate?
The question is are the times given accurate?
VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE
On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.
This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.
9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.
What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.
Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.
So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.
Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.
No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.
Please Investigate 9/11 - Time is of the essence.
====================
NOTE: YOU CAN FORWARD TO 16:06 TO SEE THE BUILDING STILL STANDING BEHIND THE JOUURNALISTS HEAD
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096&c=1
On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.
This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.
9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.
What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.
Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.
So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.
Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.
No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.
Please Investigate 9/11 - Time is of the essence.
====================
NOTE: YOU CAN FORWARD TO 16:06 TO SEE THE BUILDING STILL STANDING BEHIND THE JOUURNALISTS HEAD
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096&c=1
BRIAN
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
Strange but true...
27.02.2007 13:01
We knew before it happened and were implicitly involved. How dare I say that?
YHZ Halifax International airport was much smaller then than it is now... lots of funding poured in after the fact.
Small tarmac filled with some 60 odd planes is quite a site for that neck of the woods. The planes are all diverted from New York away from densely populated Canadian cities. Ottawa and Toronto are not a good idea, Halifax is.
Potential bombs on planes, planes land, what happens next......
From flying experience I expect the doors to burst open, the big blow up slide to inflate and lots of folks kicking off their shoes and going for a slide. Isn't what the video says will happen in the case of an emergency landing?
The airport is surrounded by small industrial estate and then lots and lots of woods. Yes, it is definitely in the boonies.
Answer: the people are left on the planes for between six to eight hours, on the tarmac?
Airline regulations dictate all emergency procedures must be directly adhered to.
What went wong?
Charity Sweet XXX
PS how comes when I called New York police with what I knew of 911 before the event, I was told that they recieved thousands of calls like mine. WTF?
Charity Sweet
e-mail:
charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk
please explain this one
27.02.2007 20:02
Is this yet another smoking gun that needs to be wished away with strange physical accounting that begs more questions than it answers?
Just demand an official INDEPENDENT and properly resourced investigation that does not stop when it bumps against official deniability as it surely will as it progresses up the chain of command. Let's get to the bottom of this once and for all, for better or for worse.
Has a FOI request for the source of this information been registered yet, does anyone know?
double zee
Source of video
27.02.2007 20:46
beeb
They Decided the Best Thing to Do was Pull It
27.02.2007 21:13
All the raw footage from ABC, NBC, BBC, Fox, CNN and CBS has apparently now been pulled from archive.org -- is someone worried that people might find more inconsistencies?
Larry
BBC: We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage
27.02.2007 22:33
4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.
So if anyone has a copy of the BBC1/2 footage from the day they would like a copy...!
beeeep!
List of raw archive footage on the Internet Archive
27.02.2007 23:34
The BBC Conspiracy Files show said in relation to the collapse of Building 7:
"With so much else going on that day, the event was barely reported"
Now we can't even check the raw footage from the news channels because they have been pulled...
-----------------
Massive 9/11 TV archive.
Keep in mind these are 41 minute 1 gig MPEG-2's.
There is also September 10th news coverage there. This is everything there
from during or after the attacks.
NBC4 Washington
ABC7 Washington
BBC
FOX5 Washington
CNN
CBS9 Washington
Long? Isn't it?
memory hole
Homepage:
http://www.pumpitout.com/documents/links.txt
evidence already exists
28.02.2007 00:17
Could be a really good edit job to discredit the story - fact is that the evidence that already exists shows that the collapse of building-7 is an inside job - such as Larry Silverstein's interview where he claimed on camera that "we made the dcision to pull the building".
A building such as Building-7 would have to be fully laiden with explosives which would have taken several days to imbed into the flooring on each level.
I would recommend that EVERYBODY is extremely cautious with this set of film
bd
We control the horizontal and the vertical...
28.02.2007 03:29
Interesting that this isn't to do with "activism" Indymedia, or should we all start thinking conspiracies.
Or just stop smoking so much dope.
Conspiraloon
Who says there are no conspircies!
28.02.2007 06:18
'The files covering the time around building 7 being dropped are now 403 Forbidden'
Who says there are no conspiracies!
Brian