. . . back in the old indymedia vaults - a good bit of foresight, seeing the way things have gone (- check the freepress "election" button for lots more info). The "engineer sketch" was so funny i didnt think it could happen - but when that local newspaper hack was told by the little old lady "guarding" vthe election computers that she didnt have the faintest clue what "patch" meant, but thats what the engineer said he was putting into the machine, it wass always going to unravel.
A quick "scroogle" of indymedia uk with "eleventh of the eleventh", "remember", "2remember the scams" "must get to a library fast" or "to remember : does that help?" shows the finger pointing at a few criminals playing "tail wags dog" with all sorts of other factors.
What next. It blows, we come up with different ways to render the consequences of the con sequences safe - or ?

IMO, it's a load of incoherent BS, but then I am probably in the minority, I usually am...

nuff said - further news looks good, expecting turbulence BUT its SO very worth it

Isn't it time the editors consigned this to the trash? Rants like this discredit and dimish the value of Indymedia as a proper news source.

From the Editorial Guidlines:

articles and/or comments may be hidden for the following reasons:

Repeated : content that is reposted or text that was originally a comment posted as a report.
Non-news : posts which are clearly purely comment, opinion or rants unrelated to a recent event or action etc.
Advertising : posts with personal or product promotions.
Disruptive : Contributions by individuals who habitually publish above mentioned discouraged content. Posts where topical or regional selections disrupts the utility of the sub pages (ie spamming regional and topic selections).
Reposts : Articles that are simply pasted from corporate news sites. Please write something original, by all means link to articles elsewhere and quote from them but don't just copy them.

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/static/editorial.html

And this and everything else you have put up falls foul of all of these, IMO.

humph is perhaps a sort of infowar shit . . . .paid?
could we sort this out - repetition of "rules" the equivalent of "experts" that appear in news in front of lots of books. . . .
or a puppet?
the resignations follow the charges, as this comment follows . . . .
ohio was the "swing state" in the USA elections . . . . most computer experts in the states ( + uk ) said the computer votecount machines were dodgy ( opaque, without papertrail, etc, etc. . . .)
perhaps this desperate cover-up waffle from "humph" should get the inquiry time, too.