Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

CONSERVATIVE - LABOUR LOONIES - UK INDEPENDENCE - BNP...

Conservative Cameronians - Corrupt Labour Loonies - Independent Indies - BNP ??? | 12.02.2007 21:26 | Analysis | Indymedia | Repression | London | World

CAMERON CONSERVATIVE - CORRUPT LOONY LABOUR - UKIP - BNP...

WHO CARES ABOUT BRITAIN...

From The Telegraph
4th December 2006


The well informed column of Christopher Booker, writer and journalist with his no-nonsense attacks on political correctness and his long documented history of attacking the institutions of Europe and the betrayal by British politicians who have long sold out to Europe.


For the first time in sixteen years of writing for the Telegraph, which is now part of the global empire of the secretive billionaire Barclay Brothers based in Brecqhou, (Channel Islands), Christopher Booker has had an article turned down by the paper’s editor, Patience Wheatcroft. What was the offending material which led to this extraordinary and historical decision?


Well can the readers be informed exactly what Christopher wanted his readers to learn. Perhaps it is the strong criticism of David Cameron and his abandon of every aspect of policy traditionally associated with the Conservative Party?

Omission

Over to Christopher Booker and what the Cameron-loving Telegraph didn’t want its readers to see:


“As David Cameron ends his first year as leader of the Opposition, there are clear signs that the greatest gamble in modern British politics has not come off. The little group of ex-public schoolboys who last year hi-jacked the Conservative Party have seemed to gamble on just one strategy. List everything the Party used to stand for – low taxes, the family, rolling back the power of the state, encouraging business, upholding our defences, curbing criminals, common sense – then go for the opposite.


”The essence of the gamble has been the belief that, in wooing the support of Lib Dems, would-be greenies, Guardian readers and the supposed "soft centre", they could take their supposed "core" supporters for granted. But as support for Cameron falters, all the evidence seems to suggest that those wished-for new recruits to his "Not The Conservative Party" are not forthcoming, while the Party's former natural supporters are left baffled, dismayed and increasingly angry.


”All this was neatly symbolised by the recent photo-opportunities staged by the three men now competing for the role of Britain's prime minister. Mr Blair and Mr Brown, aware that defence and national security (not long ago rating 34 percent on a Mori poll) still rank very much higher as voter priorities than "environmental" issues (only 8 percent), flew out to the Iraq and Afghan battle-zones to pose in front of the largest guns they could find. Mr Cameron, at the same time, flew out to the Sudan, in Lord Ashcroft's CO2 emitting private jet, to be pictured cuddling a little refugee child. It was the "Men from Mars" (WAR) against "the Boy from Venus" (LOVE). Darfur Dave did not come well out of the contrast.


”The tragedy is that, confronted by the most corrupt, hypocritical, inefficient, illiberal, discredited government in history, what millions of voters are looking for is an alternative which might put an end to the sleazy, self-regarding sham of the Blair era by displaying some "masculine" firmness: in cutting back on the bloated public sector and the out-of-control bureaucracy which is destroying our health service, education and police; which might encourage enterprise; which might restore democracy to local government; bring back some balance into our public finances; sort out the shambles into which our Armed Forces are sliding; uphold Britain's national interest, as we suffocate under the malfunctioning system of government represented by the European Union.


”In other words, what much of the country is crying out for is a party which represents precisely those values which Mr Cameron's Not-The-Conservative Party seems so hellbent on abandoning. As for what he stands for instead, almost the only clear message Darfur Dave seems to have put over to the voters is his sentimental "save the planet" greenery, on which his dotty little gimmicks and practical ignorance have simply made him a laughing stock.


”What many voters sadly begin to conclude is that Dave and his cronies seem so hopelessly ill-equipped to take on the serious business of government that, if we have to choose between one gang of PR merchants and another, better stick with the devil we know. Hence the evidence of the latest polls appearing to show that the gamble has failed. Ever larger become the number of would-be Conservatives sorely tempted to join that 40 percent who already feel so alienated from politics that they just stay sullenly at home. But the Guardian readers are scarcely flocking to replace them. So where does all this leave our country?”


Further reading


Readers looking for greater understanding of the extent of treachery which three
decades of British politicians have undertaken should read a book co-authored by Christopher Booker and Dr. Richard North:


There are alternativies...

Conservative Cameronians - Corrupt Labour Loonies - Independent Indies - BNP ???

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Looks — Fencer