Skip to content or view screen version

UK Telegraph Reveals Brit Terrorist Ops in Iraq

Kurt Nimmo | 05.02.2007 16:16 | Anti-militarism | Iraq | Terror War | World

It is interesting the Telegraph.co.uk, “Lord” Conrad Black’s online version of a neocon newspaper, would publish a story admitting that the Joint Support Group, described as “a cell from a small and anonymous British Army unit,” manages “covert human intelligence sources or agents,” including double agents, that is to say the Brits are engaged in terrorist operations, as long suspected.



It is interesting the Telegraph.co.uk, “Lord” Conrad Black’s online version of a neocon newspaper, would publish a story admitting that the Joint Support Group, described as “a cell from a small and anonymous British Army unit,” manages “covert human intelligence sources or agents,” including double agents, that is to say the Brits are engaged in terrorist operations, as long suspected.

“During the [Irish] Troubles, the JSG operated under the cover name of the Force Research Unit (FRU), which between the early 1980s and the late 1990s managed to penetrate the very heart of the IRA. By targeting and then ‘turning’ members of the paramilitary organization with a variety of ‘inducements’” ranging from blackmail to bribes, the FRU operators developed agents at virtually every command level within the IRA,” explains Sean Rayment.

Even a dullard, armed with the appropriate search criteria and Google, can put two and two together in short order and discover that much of the terrorism in Northern Ireland was orchestrated by FRU and the British government, including the despicable “human bomb” technique, that is to say “forcing civilians to drive vehicles laden with explosives into army checkpoints,” according to the Guardian.

Naturally, all of this shines a new light on the two British SAS operatives caught in Basra, driving around in a car loaded with explosives and disguised as Arabs back in 2005.

Assassinating Irish civilians was part and parcel of “an intelligence operation which had been sanctioned at the highest levels of the British Army and the British Security Service, MI5,” according to Ed Moloney, writing for the Sunday Tribune.

In addition to outright murder, British intelligence encouraged torture. Robert Stevens describes the UDA as “a fascistic, loyalist paramilitary organization,” infamous for running death squads.

Sunday Telegraph documents “confirm that as the UDA’s primary intelligence officer [Brian] Nelson passed on the names, photographs and addresses of suspected IRA members from Army Intelligence records to UDA gunmen and that he carried out assassinations under army direction.” Patrick Finucane was apparently murdered by a FRU sanctioned death squad. The Belfast solicitor was gunned down before his wife and children.

“Beginning in the 1980s the highly secretive FRU was sent into Northern Ireland to recruit and train double agents to work inside the paramilitary groups,” writes Michael S. Rose. “The FRU combated IRA terrorism by the use of paid informers, blackmail, ambushes, and other methods not approved by the Geneva Convention. In the worst case, British officers decided that in cases when it would be difficult to bring suspected IRA terrorists to justice by legitimate means, the FRU would enlist outlawed guerilla groups that possessed both the desire and the means to murder the IRA men. According to Stevens Three, the FRU assisted Protestant terrorists in carrying out what were, in effect, proxy assassinations of Catholics. In order to forge such alliances, the British officers had to overlook the fact that the interests of the Protestant death squads were not those of the United Kingdom and its government.”

In Iraq, the “JSG is the coalition’s secret weapon,” a defense source told the Telegraph. “Their job is to recruit and run covert human intelligence sources or agents—we never use the term informer. The Americans are in awe of the unit because they have nothing like them within their military.”

Kurt Nimmo
- Homepage: http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=751

Additions

and in Iran ?

05.02.2007 17:05

US spooks blame Mossad for killing an Iranian nuclear scientist inside Iran - maybe it was the British since it first 'surfaced' in yesterdays Sunday Times.
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2583167,00.html

Iranian officials have repeatedly blamed British agents in Iraq for an outbreak of ethnic unrest across the border in Iran's mainly Arab south-eastern province of Khuzestan.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4723714.stm


KHUZESTAN: THE FIRST FRONT IN THE WAR ON IRAN?

In Basra on September 19, British troops clashed with Iraqi police and Shi'ite militia, who had ironically welcomed the toppling of Saddam two years ago. The police had arrested two British undercover commandos who possessed suspicious bomb-making materials. British troops launched an armored raid on the jail to free their agents, fighting the same Iraqi police they had earlier trained. Iraqis had thought it strange that British agents would be caught with the types of bombs associated with insurgents attacking "Coalition" troops, and some assumed that the agents were trying to pit Iraqi religious groups against each other.
Yet at the same time, bombs were going off across the border in Khuzestan. In June, a series of car bombings in Ahvaz (75 miles from Basra) killed 6 people. In August, Iran arrested a group of Arab separatist rebels, and accused them of links to British intelligence in Basra. In September, explosions hit Khuzestani cities, halting crude oil transfers from onshore wells. On October 15, two major bomb explosions in an Ahvaz market killed 4 and injured 95. A November 3 analysis in Asia Times blames Iraqi Sunni insurgents for the bombings.
Iranian officials accused Britain of backing the attacks, and tied the rebel bombs to the British commando incident in Basra. The Daily Star of Beirut reported on October 17 that Iranian officials "point to Western collusion in the sudden spike this year in ethnic unrest in the strategic, oil-producing province of Khuzestan and describe it as proof of a shadowy war that is receiving far less coverage in the international press than events in Iraq. Since the beginning of 2005, riots and a bombing campaign timed to coincide with the June presidential elections rocked Khuzestan's major cities."
 http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=9073

dp


Caught in the Act: Staged Terror in Iraq

06.02.2007 21:25


Download: Caught in the Act: Staged Terror in Iraq - mp3 12M

Attached is a one hour radio show from Taking Aim,  http://takingaimradio.com/ about the UK troops caught in Basra from 27th September 2005.

Listen and make you minds up, who are you gonna believe, those defending the UK's covert ops troops...?

Taking Aim
- Homepage: http://takingaimradio.com/shows/audio.html


Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

dp

06.02.2007 00:57

I have no doubt that HM Gvt will be up to its old tricks in the Middle East. Every military campaign since the dawn of time has used such tactics.

Given the equipment that the SAS were caught with in Basra, I would concur that they were probably involved in a some sort of cross border mission. But I have seen no credible evidence of them caught with explosives. But it is highly unlikely that they were up any JSG-like shenanigans. The equipment is all wrong for a start. Using that equipment would remove the "try proving it!" defence to any charges of collusion. I mean, would they really expect anyone to believe that "insurgents" could muster airstrikes with laser guided weapons?

No doubt the Iranians also have their double agents in amongst the Coalition stooges. Just as the Iranian incursions/support in Iraq go largely unreported in all but Private Eye, I'm sure the same is going on they other way around with Coalition forces entering into Iran and training and supplying their own terrorist pets.

Iran knows that the US is very nervous about another front at the moment. Iran knows- like the rest of the world- that the US/UK are taking an almighty kicking in Iraq/Afghanistan- just as US/Israel took from Lebanon/Syria/Iran. Direct action against Iran may well facilitate a more overt support of Palestine and the opening of another major front with Israel being attacked from 3 sides. Tactical madness.

Iran knows that any overt military action against it will be highly likely a tipping point in the region and the US knows it too. I can't see any UNSC support for military action. I'd like to think that the UK Parliament wouldn't be fooled again- but hey, they bought the dodgy dossier and actually believe that dirty bombs are a real threat...

The US only seem to have their sock puppet Israel on their side regarding Iran. But Iraq has shown that they a possibly quite insane and arrogant enough to step into a situation that will make Vietnam look like the Falklands.

The current war in Iraq is spiralling into fiscal madness as the planned oil revenues are not rolling in as expected- those pesky "insurgents" keep blowing up the pipelines and ambushing tankers.

Can Bush sell Evil Iran to a Congress that has big difficulties buying 24,000 more troops in Baghdad?

Time will tell.

Kune Kune


credible evidence

06.02.2007 09:05

"But I have seen no credible evidence of them caught with explosives."

Credible evidence is something you see in a court of law. Since the British army did a jail break - which literally broke the jail - it would seem to suggest they had something to hide. Since no British, Iraqi or International court was allowed to discuss the case, the allegation stands. It's not as if the British army has never done this sort of thing. British army intelligence agents bombed Dublin, a friendly neighbour, so they will have no qualms about bombing Iran.

"WHILE refusing to give a statement about the actual operations in which he took part, JB said he knew about a number of high-profile loyalist atrocities, sponsored by the MRF. These included the shooting of three members of the Miami Showband, a popular Irish group, in July 1975. The band's bus was flagged down by members of the UVF dressed in army uniforms at a fake military checkpoint. Another MRF-sponsored atrocity, says JB, was the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of May 17, 1974, which killed 33 people and injured 250."
 http://www.sundayherald.com/analysis/analysis/display.var.1152814.0.0.php

Never mind the atrocites the SAS committed in Cambodia training Khmer Rouge rebels.

dp