Royal Society for the Protection of Bitchin'
dp | 31.01.2007 11:53 | Ecology
Most people who contribute to the RSPB think of them as a 'conservation charity'. They are the least green charity around and from personal experience I'd say they care little for anything but their own wealth. The RSPB are in the news again opposing wind farms in the Western Isles, which has been the focus of their work there for the past few years. I should say, previous to that they did some good work, including reintroducing the sea eagle.
I was in the Western Isles a few years ago, I'd been travelling around from dole office to dole office to avoid the New Deal and the war and decided to 'do my time' there since it was a nice environment. I walked into a room labelled 'Intensive Activity Period' ( the jargonese for New Deal ) to see three guys laid out on desks asleep with their heads in their hands, that made me laugh. I was also dossing out at a permaculture place there when an RSPB volunteer came around asking for nettles to replant on a project to reintroduce the corncrake to the islands. Nettles provide perfect ground cover for these lovely, although loud, little birds. And the run-down place I was staying in was rich in nothing but nettles. The New Deal office was right next to the RSPB office. So to avoid the monotony of the New Deal office I persuaded another doley to march next door and we both volunteered for a few days work at the RSPB 'reintroducing the corncrake'. In effect we were shit-shovellers, taking a farmers bales of rotten hay and spreading them out as fertiliser in a corner of a field he'd donated to plant the nettles we'd previously dug up. The RSPB employee took a distinctly 'hands-off' approach, although their volunteer joined in. The farmer warned us that we'd need protective breathing equipment as dried hay can damage your lungs. The RSPB employee had no breathing equipment so cajoled us to continue even though I asked for a mask as I had several lung-complaints already. So at the end of the day we smelled worse than shit and could barely breathe.
Anyway, back to the point. On the return journey the RSPB officer had to stop various times to investigate dead birds found by electricity pylons. Two buzzards and some kind of hawk were found under three different poles while I was there. They looked healthy birds apart from being dead ;-)
I'm fairly technical, I've got an HNC in power-line transmissions amongst other basic qualifications. The birds weren't obviously burned at any point in their bodies but they were obviously killed by the transmission lines, given that they were all under power-line poles. So I feel it is safe to assume they were either killed by badly insulated power poles or by the radiation these give off, and I told this to the RSPB woman.
I saw every turbine in the Western Isles and found no dead birds near them. I saw many dead birds near ordinary transmission lines. You often find dead birds under transmissioj lines. And yet the RSPB in the Western Isles are still pursuing a vendettta against wind-power. My impression was there was wide-spread local support for local turbines ( for reasons of autonomy rather than sustainability ) and yet the RSPB there propagandise against wind-power. Local generators of any kind means less transmission cable and so less global-warming, as 90% of generated electricity is lost through electrical resistance in the distribution 'grid'. The fact that wind-power is sustainable and local with no toxic by-products and no need for long transmission lines is just the cherry on the cake.
And so for the RSPB to spend serious amounts of money on 'surveys' to oppose wind-power on false claims that it will harm birds - well, I for one suspect they are being subsidised by British Energy.
By the way, why did RSPB Scotland take 86 flights last year ? Empathy with the birds ? Those self-serving fakers should read up on something that begins with Global and ends in Warming. The RSPB should either sack ALL of it's Scottish staff or stop pretending to be a friend of the environment.
Anyway, back to the point. On the return journey the RSPB officer had to stop various times to investigate dead birds found by electricity pylons. Two buzzards and some kind of hawk were found under three different poles while I was there. They looked healthy birds apart from being dead ;-)
I'm fairly technical, I've got an HNC in power-line transmissions amongst other basic qualifications. The birds weren't obviously burned at any point in their bodies but they were obviously killed by the transmission lines, given that they were all under power-line poles. So I feel it is safe to assume they were either killed by badly insulated power poles or by the radiation these give off, and I told this to the RSPB woman.
I saw every turbine in the Western Isles and found no dead birds near them. I saw many dead birds near ordinary transmission lines. You often find dead birds under transmissioj lines. And yet the RSPB in the Western Isles are still pursuing a vendettta against wind-power. My impression was there was wide-spread local support for local turbines ( for reasons of autonomy rather than sustainability ) and yet the RSPB there propagandise against wind-power. Local generators of any kind means less transmission cable and so less global-warming, as 90% of generated electricity is lost through electrical resistance in the distribution 'grid'. The fact that wind-power is sustainable and local with no toxic by-products and no need for long transmission lines is just the cherry on the cake.
And so for the RSPB to spend serious amounts of money on 'surveys' to oppose wind-power on false claims that it will harm birds - well, I for one suspect they are being subsidised by British Energy.
By the way, why did RSPB Scotland take 86 flights last year ? Empathy with the birds ? Those self-serving fakers should read up on something that begins with Global and ends in Warming. The RSPB should either sack ALL of it's Scottish staff or stop pretending to be a friend of the environment.
dp
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Hypocriters
31.01.2007 22:01
Vermi
Damn straight.
01.02.2007 18:37
*even if that means that I remain the sole surviving member of "the movement".
Mr. Humph
flying warms the globe
01.02.2007 19:43
Mr Humphs alleges I am being overly pure suggesting this but it is hardly purist to expect an organisation who pays lip-service to climate change to take the train instead of flying everywhere. At least when confronted with their levels of flights the Soil Association had the decency to hold up it's hands and plead guilty.
dp
RSPCA
01.02.2007 19:50
Mongrel
What the RSPB actually says about wind farms...
01.02.2007 20:05
The available evidence suggests that appropriately positioned wind farms do not pose a significant hazard for birds. However, evidence from the US and Spain confirms that poorly sited wind farms can cause severe problems for birds, through disturbance, habitat loss/damage or collision with turbines.
Because of this, the RSPB has objected to 76 wind farm proposals (on and offshore) between 2000-2004 and has raised concerns about a further 129. The RSPB recently objected to a proposed 234 turbine wind farm on the Isle of Lewis in the Hebrides, on an extremely fragile and special area for wildlife.
Environmental assessment
The RSPB insists that all wind farm proposals are subject to rigorous environmental assessment before development is permitted and that the effects of any approved developments are monitored before and after construction.
We will, and do, object to specific wind farm proposals where there is an inadequate environmental assessment, where the assessment reveals potential environmental problems that cannot be mitigated, or where there is insufficient knowledge about the threat to sensitive bird populations or their habitats to conclude that there will not be a problem.
Research and monitoring
To ensure that future wind farms do not affect sensitive bird populations or their habitats, the RSPB is pressing the government for more research and monitoring of the effects of these developments on birds."
From: http://www.rspb.org.uk/policy/windfarms/index.asp (Accessed 1/2/07)
So it seems that the RSPB, far from being against wind farms per se, are just opposing those that would have severe implications for wildilfe. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking that wind turbines are always 100% benign to wildlife.
The British Wind Assoication actually cite the RSPB to disprove claims that wind farms are bad for birds:
"Myth: Wind farms kill birds
Fact: The RSPB stated in its 2004 information leaflet Wind farms and birds, that "in the UK, we have not so far witnessed any major adverse effects on birds associated with wind farms". Wind farms are always subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment and BWEA members follow the industry's Best Practice Guidelines and work closely with organisations such as English Nature and the RSPB to ensure that wind farm design and layout does not interfere with sensitive species or wildlife designated sites. Moreover, a recent report published in the journal Nature confirmed that the greatest threat to bird populations in the UK is climate change".
From: http://www.bwea.com/energy/myths.html (Accessed 1/2/07)
However I have to agree with you with the amount of flying done by people who are supposed to be campinging against climate chaos, it's awfully hypocritcal and it's not like they don't know, train and coach travel are perfectly viable options in this country, and for international conferences there is this amazing technology known as videoconferencing.
But all the same, even if the RSPB should be criticised for their non-green actions, it still doesn't erase the good stuff they are doing to ensure the intergrity of the environment.
Mr. Humph