Afraid Of The Truth?
Craig T. Furlong | 25.11.2006 06:57 | Analysis | Other Press
I posted a few days ago a short summary of a report (I am one of the authors) about 9/11 that contained only facts issued by the US government, and you decided to make it "hidden". (Here's the summary of the report again, so you will know what I am talking about.) I've never run across censorship before. You should be ashamed of yourselves. These are only facts--no theory. What are you afraid of?
“Seismic Proof – 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”
Link:
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.st911.org
The US Government, incriminated by its own facts, the perfect evidence—how ironic.
Summary:
News Tip: A real 9/11 smoking gun…that no one can debunk (these are facts, not theory).
Airplane “Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity
The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found an indisputable causal link:
One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)
Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual air crash?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?
Notes:
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic time (which had been attributed in error by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as plane “impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the sub-basements before the plane crashed.
Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11. Both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.
Demand a new, truly independent, criminal investigation of 9/11, this time a real one.
Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}
Link:
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.st911.org The US Government, incriminated by its own facts, the perfect evidence—how ironic.
Summary:
News Tip: A real 9/11 smoking gun…that no one can debunk (these are facts, not theory).
Airplane “Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity
The official times for plane "impact" [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found an indisputable causal link:
One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)
Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual air crash?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?
Notes:
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic time (which had been attributed in error by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as plane “impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the sub-basements before the plane crashed.
Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11. Both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.
Demand a new, truly independent, criminal investigation of 9/11, this time a real one.
Justice waits...{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}
Craig T. Furlong
e-mail:
cfurlong1@socal.rr.com
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
nothing to see here
25.11.2006 11:53
dont be with the terrorists go shopping be happy SHUT UP!
move along now
Why it was hidden...
25.11.2006 13:57
In other words, by having selected topics including 'scotland' and 'indymedia', the post breeched the guideline on disruptive posts "Posts where topical or regional selections disrupts the utility of the sub pages (ie spamming regional and topic selections)."
And, by offering nothing new in terms of analysis nor being related to a recent event or action (espicially in terms of the UK or grassroot social struggles falling under the remit of indymedia UK), it might also have been considered to have breeched the 'Non-news' guidelines "posts which are clearly purely comment, opinion or rants unrelated to a recent event or action etc."
Indymedia is intended for orginal reporting and analysis of news, primirialy actions and events relating to grassroots struggles taking place in the UK.
A lot of 9/11 posts do get hidden on indymedia UK. There are dozens if not hundred of websites set up to cover just this issue. There is rarely anything new posted about 9/11 and indymedia is not intended to be a debating forum nor a place to promote other sites.
When there is something new, for example the visit to london of one of the 9/11 suvivors, then those posts are not hidden.
Complaints, queries or concerns about moderation should be posted to the features mailing list and not the newswire. Posts about moderation (such as this one) will be hidden.
ed